Regulation of iron transport related genes by boron in the marine bacterium Marinobacter algicola DG893

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92162-1030, USA. .
Metallomics (Impact Factor: 3.59). 06/2013; 5(8). DOI: 10.1039/c3mt00068k
Source: PubMed


While there has been extensive interest in the use of boron isotope ratios as a surrogate of pH in paleoclimate studies in the context of climate change-related questions, the high (0.4 mM) concentration and the depth-independent (conservative or non-nutrient-like) concentration profile of this element have led to boron being neglected as a potentially biologically relevant element in the modern ocean. Here we report that boron affects the expression of a number of protein and genes in the "algal-associated" Gram-negative marine bacterium Marinobacter algicola DG893. Most intriguingly, a number of these proteins and genes are related to iron uptake. In a recent separate publication we have shown that boron regulates one such iron transport related protein, i.e. the periplasmic iron binding protein FbpA via a direct interaction of the metalloid with this protein. Here we show that a number of other iron uptake related genes are also affected by boron but in the opposite way i.e. they are up-regulated. We propose that the differential effect of boron on FbpA expression relative to other iron transport related genes is a result of an interaction between boron and the global iron regulatory protein Fur.

Download full-text


Available from: Shady Amin, Jun 26, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Boron in the ocean is generally considered a non-biological element due to its relatively high concentration (0.4 mM) and depth independent concentration profile. Here we report an unexpected role for boron in the iron transport system of the marine bacterium Marinobacter algicola. Proteome analysis under varying boron concentrations revealed that the periplasmic ferric binding protein (Mb-FbpA) was among the proteins whose expression was most affected, strongly implicating the involvement of boron in iron utilization. Here we show that boron facilitates Fe(3+) sequestration by Mb-FbpA at pH 8 (oceanic pH) by acting as a synergistic anion (B(OH)4(1-)). Fe(3+) sequestration does not occur at pH 6.5 where boric acid (B(OH)3; pKa = 8.55) is the predominant species. Borate anion is also shown to bind to apo-Mb-FbpA with mM affinity at pH 8, consistent with the biological relevance implied from boron's oceanic concentration (0.4 mM). Borate is among those synergistic anions tested which support the strongest Fe(3+) binding to Mb-FbpA, where the range of anion dependent affinity constants is log K'eff = 21 - 22. Since the pKa of boric acid (8.55) lies near the pH of ocean water, changes in oceanic pH, as a consequence of fluctuations in atmospheric CO2, may perturb iron uptake in many marine heterotrophic bacteria due to a decrease in oceanic borate anion concentration.
    Journal of the American Chemical Society 09/2013; 135(39). DOI:10.1021/ja406609s · 12.11 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: ABSTRACT The marine environment is the most dynamic and most variable among the natural environments present on the globe due to its continuously changing patterns of salinity, sea surface temperature, pH, and pressure. Thus, bacteria inhabiting this environment possess the inbuilt mechanisms of adaptation necessary in such fluctuating environmental conditions, and the harboring of heavy metal–resistant genes adds to their efficiency with regard to metal remediation compared with their terrestrial counterparts. Two highly mercury-resistant isolates, one from the marine environment and another from steel industry waste, were identified as Bacillus thuringiensis PW-05 and Bacillus sp. SD-43, respectively, by 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. When various characters of these two isolates, e.g., biochemical, morphological, antibiotic resistance, and tolerance to other heavy metals, were analyzed, they were found to share common features. However, the marine Bacillus isolate (PW-05) was found to be more capable than its terrestrial counterpart in terms of mercury volatilization capability, i.e., 94.72% in the case of PW-05 and 60.06% in the case of SD-43. Hence, marine bacteria can be used more efficiently than their terrestrial counterparts for enhanced bioremediation of mercury in contaminated envi-ronments.
    Bioremediation Journal 07/2014; 18(3). DOI:10.1080/10889868.2014.899555 · 0.50 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bacteria secrete small molecules known as siderophores to acquire iron from their surroundings. For over 60 years, investigations into the bioinorganic chemistry of these molecules, including fundamental coordination chemistry studies, have provided insight into the crucial role that siderophores play in bacterial iron homeostasis. The importance of understanding the fundamental chemistry underlying bacterial life has been highlighted evermore in recent years because of the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and need to prevent the global rise of these superbugs. Increasing reports of siderophores functioning in capacities other than iron transport have appeared recently, but reports of “non-classical” siderophore functions have long paralleled those of iron transport. One particular “non-classical” function of these iron chelators, namely antibiotic activity, was even documented before the role of siderophores in iron transport was established. In this Perspective, we present an exposition of past and current work into non-classical functions of siderophores and highlight the directions in which we anticipate that this research is headed. Examples include the ability of siderophores to function as zincophores, chalkophores, and metallophores for a variety of other metals, sequester heavy metal toxins, transport boron, act as signalling molecules, regulate oxidative stress, and provide antibacterial activity.
    Dalton Transactions 02/2015; 44(14). DOI:10.1039/C4DT03559C · 4.20 Impact Factor