Percutaneous aortic valve replacement in two cases at high surgical risk: Procedural details and implications for patient selection

Interventional Cardiology, Division of Cardiology, University of Turin, San Giovanni Battista, ''Molinette'' Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Minerva cardioangiologica (Impact Factor: 0.53). 03/2009; 57(1):131-6.
Source: PubMed


The morbidity and mortality burden of heart valve disease is increasing in the developing world, especially among the elderly. Whereas surgery remains the standard of care in fit patients with degenerative aortic stenosis, percutaneous aortic valve replacement could become an effective alternative to surgery in selected higher risk patients. The authors report on two women with aortic stenosis, both at high surgical risk (an 81-year-old female with coronary artery and cerebro-vascular disease, and a 70-year-old female with end-stage cirrhosis), in whom percutaneous valve replacement was effectively performed by means of transfemoral access and retrograde CoreValve Re-valving System implantation. Two major post-procedural complications occurred, both effectively managed, in the second patient: a third degree atrio-ventricular block (requiring permanent pace-maker implantation) and bleeding from the right femoral artery access (requiring implantation of two covered stents and blood transfusion). Despite the increased baseline risk, both patients were discharged asymptomatic, the first twelve days and the other three weeks after admission. In the authors' experience percutaneous aortic valve replacement can be performed with reasonable safety in patient with severe aortic stenosis at high surgical risk.

80 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Clopidogrel is a mainstay in the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes or those receiving endovascular prostheses. However, its efficacy has been challenged in the recent past by studies suggesting variable individual responsiveness and by new, more potent competitors, such as prasugrel and ticagrelor. But what is the actual body of evidence in support of clopidogrel? Is there any dark side of the moon? What is the role of prasugrel, which has already been approved in Europe and in the United States? And what will be the future role of ticagrelor, when approved for routine clinical practice? We hereby concisely summarize the scope of this clinical choice, providing arguments in favor and against each of the three antiplatelet agents: clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor.
    World Journal of Cardiology (WJC) 06/2010; 2(6):131-4. DOI:10.4330/wjc.v2.i6.131 · 2.06 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is the only treatment known to improve symptoms and survival in patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis. Perioperative mortality, however, is high among many patients for whom SAVR may be indicated. Percutaneous heart valve replacement (PHVR) is an emerging, catheter-based technology that allows for implantation of a prosthetic valve without open heart surgery. This review describes the available literature on PHVR for aortic stenosis, which comprised 84 published reports representing 76 distinct studies and 2375 unique patients. Successful implantation was achieved in 94% of patients; 30-day survival was 89%. Differences between patients undergoing PHVR and those typically selected for SAVR make full interpretation of these results difficult. A large, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing PHVR with SAVR or medical management was recently completed, with initial results expected in September 2010. Pending publication of findings from that trial, the available evidence is inadequate to determine the most appropriate clinical role of PHVR or the specific patient populations for whom it might eventually be indicated.
    Annals of internal medicine 09/2010; 153(5):314-24. DOI:10.1059/0003-4819-153-5-201009070-00267 · 17.81 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patients with cirrhosis who undergo cardiac operation with extracorporeal circulation are at high risk for operative morbidity and mortality. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) can obviate the need for cardiopulmonary bypass and may reduce operative morbidity in comparison to standard aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in select patients. Review of 18 patients with aortic valve stenosis and cirrhosis treated with TAVR (n = 6) or SAVR (n = 12). Patient age was 71 years (58 to 83) and STS Predicted Risk of Mortality was 3.2% (0.7 to 12.3). There were 15 males (83%). Child-Turcotte-Pugh stage was A in 10 patients (56%), B in four (22%), and C in two (11%); the median MELD score was nine (7 to 14). TAVR was successful in all patients without the need for mechanical or cardiopulmonary bypass support. Blood transfusion occurred in four patients (67%) in the TAVR group and in the entire SAVR group. No deaths occurred in the TAVR group, and two (17%) occurred in the SAVR group. Operative complications occurred in two patients (33%) in TAVR group and in eight (67%) in the SAVR group. Hospital stay was five days (3 to 10) in the TAVR group and six (3 to 38) in the SAVR group. All TAVR patients were alive at last follow-up of 219 days (29 to 723), while only five were alive in the SAVR group at 228 days (36 to 719). Our initial experience with TAVR in patients with cirrhosis is encouraging. The technique may be a viable alternative to SAVR in this high-risk subset of patients.
    Journal of Cardiac Surgery 07/2013; 28(5). DOI:10.1111/jocs.12177 · 0.89 Impact Factor

Similar Publications