Systematic reviews of psychosocial interventions for autism: an umbrella review.

Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology (Impact Factor: 3.29). 03/2009; 51(2):95-104. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03211.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A wide range of psychosocial interventions for the treatment of individuals with autism-spectrum disorders (ASDs) have been evaluated in systematic reviews. We conducted an umbrella review of systematic reviews of the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for ASD.
Comprehensive searches were conducted in 25 bibliographic databases, relevant journals and reference lists up to May 2007. Studies included were systematic reviews on any psychosocial intervention for individuals with ASDs. Two reviewers independently assessed study relevance and quality.
Thirty systematic reviews were included. The majority of reviews evaluated interventions based on behavioural theory (n=9) or communication-focused (n=7) therapies. Positive intervention outcomes were reported in the majority of the reviews. Methodological quality of the reviews was generally poor.
The reviews reported positive outcomes for many of the interventions, suggesting that some form of treatment is favourable over no treatment. However, there is little evidence for the relative effectiveness of these treatment options. Many of the systematic reviews had methodological weaknesses that make them vulnerable to bias. There is a need for further systematic reviews that adhere to strict scientific methods and for primary studies that make direct comparisons between different treatment options.

1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper we present the design of a wearable device that reads positive facial expressions using physiological signals. We first analyze facial morphology in 3 dimensions and facial electromyographic signals on different facial locations and show that we can detect electromyographic signals with high amplitude on areas of low facial mobility on the side of the face, which are correlated to ones obtained from electrodes on traditional surface electromyographic capturing positions on top of facial muscles on the front of the face. We use a multi-attribute decision-making method to find adequate electrode positions on the side of face to capture these signals. Based on this analysis, we design and implement an ergonomic wearable device with high reliability. Because the signals are recorded distally, the proposed device uses independent component analysis and an artificial neural network to analyze them and achieve a high facial expression recognition rate on the side of the face. The recognized emotional facial expressions through the wearable interface device can be recorded during therapeutic interventions and for long-term facial expression recognition to quantify and infer the user's affective state in order to support medical professionals.
    IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 03/2014; 5(3):227 - 237. DOI:10.1109/TAFFC.2014.2313557 · 3.47 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this article we develop a typology of review types and provide a descriptive insight into the most common reviews found in top IS journals. Our assessment reveals that the number of IS reviews has increased over the years. The majority of the 139 reviews are theoretical in nature, followed by narrative reviews, meta-analyses, descriptive reviews, hybrid reviews, critical reviews, and scoping reviews. Considering the calls for IS research to develop a cumulative tradition, we hope more review articles will be published in the future and encourage researchers who start a review to use our typology to position their contribution.
    Information & Management 02/2015; 52(2):183-199. DOI:10.1016/ · 1.79 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Early detection of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) is a prerequisite for early intervention. Questionnaires may offer a cost-effective alternative to clinician-led screening in identifying toddlers and preschoolers in primary-care settings requiring specialized ASD assessment. Parents of 97 children aged 16-60 months attending childcare centers were recruited. Parents completed the 10-item Parents' Evaluations of Developmental Status (PEDS) and an ASD screening questionnaire-the 23-item Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT). Five percent of children required specialized ASD assessment based on their M-CHAT scores. Using a PEDS total score cutoff of 4 or more, these children were detected with an adjusted rate of 65% sensitivity and 88% specificity. These data provide some support for tiered screening with the PEDS and M-CHAT in identifying children requiring specialized ASD assessment. Given PEDS is a universally administered developmental screen in many jurisdictions, further research using PEDS and M-CHAT is warranted.
    Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities 12/2013; 7(1):1-13. DOI:10.1080/19315864.2012.704489

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 1, 2014