Article

The outcomes after surgical resection in pancreatic endocrine tumors: an institutional experience.

Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Irwon-dong, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
European journal of surgical oncology: the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology (Impact Factor: 2.89). 02/2009; 35(7):728-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2009.01.006
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Sporadic pancreatic endocrine tumors (PET) can be managed surgically with excellent outcomes. The aim of this study was to analyze surgical outcomes and factors influencing survival.
Between 1995 and 2007, 96 patients with sporadic PET who underwent surgery at our institution were retrospectively reviewed for clinicopathologic variables and outcomes according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classifications.
Thirty-nine patients had well-differentiated tumors (WDT) with benign behavior, 23 had uncertain behavior, 27 had low-grade carcinoma, and 7 were diagnosed with high-grade carcinoma. R0 resection was performed in 84 patients. No recurrence was observed in WDT regardless of its behavior or curability but 16 of 34 patients with carcinoma had recurrence. Five-year overall survival (OS) for R0-resected patients with carcinoma was 57%, and OS at 3 years for R1/R2-resected patients was 23% (P = 0.012). The WHO classification and R0 resection were independent prognostic factors in multivariate analysis.
This single institutional experience demonstrated that surgical resection is curative for WDT and recurrences are frequent in spite of curative resection for malignant PET. The WHO classification and R0 resection remained independent prognostic factor.

0 Followers
 · 
131 Views
  • Source
    Cirugía Española 04/2014; 92(4):291–293. DOI:10.1016/j.ciresp.2012.10.008 · 0.89 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To date, empirical literature has generally been considered lacking in relation to neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), the highly malignant subgroup of neuroendocrine neoplasms. NECs are often found in the lungs or the gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) system and can be of small or large cell type. Concentrating on GEP-NECs, we can conclude that survival times are poor, with a median of only 4–16 months depending on disease stage and primary site. Further, this aggressive disease appears to be on the rise, with incidence numbers increasing while survival times are stagnant. Treatment strategies concerning surgery are often undecided and second-line chemotherapy is not yet established. After an OPEN ACCESS Diagnostics 2015, 5 120 analysis of over 2600 articles, we can conclude that there is indeed more empirical literature concerning GEP-NECs available than previously assumed. This unique review is based on 333 selected articles and contains detailed information concerning all aspects of GEP-NECs. Namely, the classification, histology, genetic abnormalities, epidemiology, origin, biochemistry, imaging, treatment and survival of GEP-NECs are described. Also, organ-specific summaries with more detail in relation to disease presentation, diagnosis, treatment and survival are presented. Finally, key points are discussed with directions for future research priorities.
    04/2015; 2015(5):119-176. DOI:10.3390/diagnostics5020119
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the prognostic significance of TNM and grading categories in curatively resected non-functioning neuroendocrine pancreatic carcinoma (nfnepC). Eighteen nfnepC were retrospectively analyzed for differences in survival. (1) There was a correlation between pT (P = 0.026), respectively pM categories (P = 0.016) and survival. (2) G categories and length of survival were closely correlated (P = 0.0036). (3) Disease stages I-IV had a significant effect on survival (P = 0.051). (4) The WHO classification in well and poorly differentiated carcinomas proved to be the most conclusive predictive factor (P = 0.0009). (5) Subgroups with significantly different prognoses determined by histological grade were present within disease stage II. The retrospective analysis showed a good correlation between survival and pT, pM, tumor stage, G categories, and WHO classification in well and poorly differentiated carcinomas. Including histological differentiation in the staging system or carrying it out separately in well and poorly differentiated carcinomas, could enhance the predictive potential of TNM-based disease stages.
    Journal of Surgical Oncology 07/2011; 104(1):17-21. DOI:10.1002/jso.21889 · 2.84 Impact Factor