Article

Identification with mainstream culture and preference for alternative alcohol treatment approaches in a community sample.

University of Washington, Box 354944, Seattle, WA 98195-0650, USA.
Behavior therapy (Impact Factor: 2.85). 04/2009; 40(1):72-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.beth.2008.01.002
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although various treatment approaches are available for alcohol problems, less than 25% of individuals with alcohol use disorders obtain treatment. The purpose of this study is to evaluate interest in attending alternative alcohol treatments, such as meditation and acupuncture, compared to Alcoholics Anonymous (AA). A community sample of 156 adult participants concerned about their drinking were recruited through flyers and newspaper advertisements to complete a Web-based survey assessing identification with mainstream culture, sexual identity, and likelihood to attend alternative alcohol treatments. Participants reported higher likelihood of attending alternative treatments as compared to AA, and lesbian, gay, and bisexual participants (28.2% of the sample) were more likely to attend alternative treatments than heterosexual participants. A series of regression analyses were conducted to test whether the relationship between sexual identity and likelihood to attend alternative treatments was mediated by identification with mainstream culture. Participants who were less strongly identified with mainstream culture, regardless of sexual identity, reported higher likelihood of attending alternative treatments. These findings highlight that, for certain subgroups of the population, alternative treatments for alcohol misuse are appealing and suggest the need for future research testing the efficacy of alternative treatments for alcohol problems.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
54 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
    Journal of LGBT Issues in Counseling 12/2012;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Use and preferences for substance abuse treatment can vary by ethnicity. However, little is known about use and preferences among Native Hawaiians and Asian Americans. Interviews from 192 admitted multi-ethnic residents from two treatment facilities in Hawaii were conducted. More similarities than differences were found. The most utilized treatments were Alcoholics Anonymous and the emergency department, with no significant ethnic differences. However, Native Hawaiians and Asian Americans were significantly less likely to have spoken to a mental health provider about alcohol problems (32%, 39%, respectively vs. 69% of Euro Americans) and to have seen a physician for a drinking-related problem (21% of Native Hawaiians and 19% of Asian Americans vs. 41% of Euro Americans). Native Hawaiians were significantly more likely to consider marriage counselling to be an effective form of treatment (33% vs. 11% of Asian Americans and 9% of Euro Americans). Implications for substance abuse treatment are discussed. The findings suggest that it is important to integrate the field of substance abuse in multiple systems; including substance abuse, medical, criminal, social service and community settings to ensure treatment preferences are met. Ethnic differences may also have implications for expanding and tailoring services.
    Journal of Substance Use 03/2011; 16(2):161-170. · 0.48 Impact Factor