Anal Dysplasia in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Journal of the American College of Surgeons (Impact Factor: 4.45). 01/2009; 207(6):914-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.08.005
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although the risk of anal cancer in immunosuppressed individuals is significantly higher than in the general population, methods for detecting precancerous anal dysplasia have not been well studied in solid-organ transplant recipients. We sought to identify the incidence of anal dysplasia in kidney transplant recipients and associated factors that increase the likelihood of dysplasia.
We prospectively analyzed kidney transplant recipients who had been immunosuppressed for at least 6 months with a functioning allograft. We interviewed willing participants and performed anal cytology sampling and high-resolution anoscopy; if we found microscopic abnormalities, we performed biopsies. We used univariate analysis to measure the association between variables and anal dysplasia.
Of the 40 participants, 15 were women and 25 were men; their mean age was 61 years. Their median duration of immunosuppression was 5.6 years; 23 (59%) had fewer than 5 lifetime sexual partners, and 2 (5%) reported ever practicing anal intercourse. Of all cytology specimens, 35 (88%) had sufficient cells for interpretation and 2 (6%) demonstrated dysplasia. We performed biopsies in 11 patients; 6 had dysplasia (4 low-grade, 2 high-grade). Of these patients, five had normal anal cytology. The sensitivity of cytology to predict histologic evidence of dysplasia was 17%. Overall, seven (18%) had dysplasia according to either cytology or histology specimens; two (5%) had high-grade dysplasia. We found no significant associations between the tested variables and the presence of dysplasia.
A significant proportion of kidney transplant recipients harbor anal dysplasia. One time anal cytology sampling was not predictive of histologic findings. Although these findings confirm their high risk for dysplasia, a larger sample is required to more accurately quantify risk factors for dysplasia and progression to cancer.

  • Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 07/2012; 55(7):735-49. DOI:10.1097/DCR.0b013e318255815e · 3.20 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: End-stage renal failure (ESRF) and renal transplant recipients are thought to be associated with an increased risk of colorectal complications. A review of the literature was performed to assess the prevalence and outcome in both benign and malignant colorectal disease. No prospective randomized studies assessing colorectal complications in ESRF or renal transplant were identified. Case series and case reports have described the incidence and management of benign colorectal complications. Complications included diverticulitis,infective colitis, colonic bleeding and colonic perforation. There was insufficient evidence to associated iverticular disease with adult polycystic kidney disease.Three population-based studies have shown up to a twofold increased incidence of colonic cancer but not rectal cancer for renal transplant recipients. Bowel cancer screening (as per the general population) by faecal occult blood testing appears justified for renal transplant patients; however, evidence suggests that consideration of starting screening at a younger age may be worthwhile because of an increased risk of developing colonic cancer.Two population-based studies have shown a threefold and 10-fold increased incidence of anal cancer for renal transplant recipients. A single case–control study demonstrated significant increased prevalence of anal human papilloma virus (HPV) and intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN)in patients with established renal transplants. Despite the lack of high-level evidence,ESRF and renal transplantation were associated with colorectal complications that could result in major morbidity and mortality. Bowel cancer screening in this patient group appears justified. The effectiveness of screening for HPV, AIN and anal cancer in renal transplant recipients remains unclear.
    Colorectal Disease 04/2012; 14(4):403-15. DOI:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02491.x · 2.02 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Renal transplantations (RTs) are performed routinely in many countries. After RT, the administration of lifelong immunosuppressive therapy is required. As a consequence, renal transplant recipients (RTRs) have a high risk to develop virus-associated (pre)malignancies, such as Human papillomavirus (HPV) related anogenital (pre)malignancies. It is known that the majority of the RTRs are infected with HPV and that these women have a 14-fold increased risk of cervical cancer, up to 50-fold of vulvar cancer and up to 100-fold of anal cancer. Often, treatment of these lesions requires concessions and may be suboptimal as radiation therapy and extensive surgery may damage the renal transplant. Therefore, prognosis may be compromised due to inadequately treated malignancies. Especially for these immunocompromised patients prevention is of utmost importance. Yearly cervical cancer screening for RTRs is advised, but appears to be executed poorly. For the future, optimizing screening and prevention of anogenital (pre)malignancies is an important issue for women after RT. This review gives a broad overview of all aspects regarding HPV-related (pre)malignancies of the female anogenital tract in RTRs.
    Critical reviews in oncology/hematology 03/2012; 84(2):161-80. DOI:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2012.02.008 · 5.27 Impact Factor