Article

A randomized placebo-controlled comparison of 2 prebiotic/probiotic combinations in preterm infants: Impact on weight gain, intestinal microbiota, and fecal short-chain fatty acids

Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis, 95616, USA.
Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition (Impact Factor: 2.87). 03/2009; 48(2):216-25. DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31818de195
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To compare the effect of 2 prebiotic/probiotic products on weight gain, stool microbiota, and stool short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) content of premature infants.
This randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial included 90 premature infants treated with either a dietary supplement containing 2 lactobacillus species plus fructooligosaccharides (CUL, Culturelle, ConAgra, Omaha, NE), a supplement containing several species of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria plus fructooligosaccharides (PBP, ProBioPlus DDS, UAS Laboratories, Eden Prairie, MN), or placebo (a dilute preparation of Pregestamil formula) twice daily for 28 days or until discharge if earlier. The primary outcome was weight gain. Secondary outcomes were stool bacterial analysis by culture and 16S rDNA quantitative polymerase chain reaction and stool SCFA content measured by high performance liquid chromatography.
Both prebiotic/probiotic combinations contained more bacterial species than noted on the label. No significant effect on infant growth of either prebiotic/probiotic supplement was observed. By cultures, 64% of infants receiving PBP became colonized with bifidobacteria, compared with 18% of infants receiving CUL and 27% of infants receiving placebo (chi-square, P = 0.064). No differences were noted between groups in colonization rates for lactobacilli, Gram-negative enteric bacteria, or staphylococci. By 16S rDNA polymerase chain reaction analysis, the bifidobacteria content in the stools of the infants receiving PBP was higher than in the infants receiving CUL or placebo (Kruskal-Wallis, P = 0.011). No significant differences in stool SCFA content were detected between groups. No adverse reactions were noted.
Infants receiving PBP were more likely to become colonized with bifidobacteria. No significant differences in weight gain or stool SCFA content were detected.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Stephen Bennett, Aug 27, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
149 Views
  • Source
    • "Lodinová-Žádníková et al., 2010 Luoto et al., 2010 Maldonado et al., 2010, 2012 Manzoni et al., 2009, 2011 Mihatsch et al., 2010 Mohan et al., 2008. Morisset et al., 2011 Nermes et al., 2011 Niers et al., 2009 Ou et al., 2012 Panigrahi et al., 2008 Rautava et al., 2009 Ritchie et al., 2010 Rojas et al., 2012 Romeo et al., 2011 Rose et al., 2010 Rougé et al., 2009 Rozé et al., 2012 Salmi et al., 2010 Samanta et al., 2008 Sari et al., 2012 Savino et al., 2010 Scalabrin et al., 2009 Soh et al., 2009, 2010 Szajewska et al., 2013 Taipale et al., 2011, 2012 Teran et al., 2009 Underwood et al., 2009 Van der Aa et al., 2010, 2011, 2012 Velaphi et al., 2008 Vlieger et al., 2009 West et al., 2009 Wickens et al., 2012 Yamasaki et al., 2012 Youngster et al., 2011 probiotic strains Bifidobacterium infantis (unspecified), "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this study, we systematically evaluated safety aspects in clinical trials with probiotics and synbiotics in young infants (0-2 years of age). This study is an update of earlier reports and covers the recent literature from 2008-2013. The safety evaluation is performed along the Common Terminology Clinical Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 scale, hereby also providing guidance for future studies. Safety aspects are represented and related to number of participants per probiotic strain/culture, study duration, dosage, clinical condition and selected afflictions. The results show a deficiency in the precise reporting and classification of adverse events in most studies. Analysis of 57 clinical trials with probiotics and synbiotics in combination with eight follow-up studies indicate that probiotic administration to infants between 0 and 24 months is safe with regard to the evaluated strains in infants with a particular health status or susceptibility. Most adverse events and serious adverse events were considered unrelated to the study product, and there were no major safety concerns. Almost all studies concluded that none of the adverse effects were related to the study product; the study products are generally well tolerated. Finally, inconsistent, imprecise and potentially incomplete reporting as well as the variation in probiotic strains, dosages, administration regimes, study populations and reported outcomes, greatly limit the generalizability of conclusions and argue convincingly for obligatory and standardised behaviour on adverse events (CTCAE) reporting in 'food' studies.
    Beneficial Microbes 01/2014; 5(1):1-16. DOI:10.3920/BM2013.0046 · 1.50 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w. e l s ev i e r. c o m / l o c a t e / j m i c m e t h severe gastrointestinal complications such as neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis remains controversial and should be explored (Schurr and Perkins, 2008). Moreover, probiotic bacteria such as bifidobacteria are now proposed as diet complement and could bring benefits that need further evaluations (Underwood et al., 2009). The aim of this study is to optimize PCR-TTGE analysis of the faecal microbial community of neonate infants. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Temporal Temperature Gel Electrophoresis of amplified 16S rRNA gene sequences (16S rDNA PCR-TTGE) constitutes a culture-independent molecular method used to study bacterial communities. All the technical steps are crucial for quality and exhaustiveness of the results obtained by such approach. Careful optimization of the protocols used is ideally needed for each ecosystem studied. We present here the strategy used to construct an optimized protocol for a 16S rDNA PCR-TTGE-based analysis of gut microflora in neonates. Improvement of the different steps, i.e. total DNA extraction, amplification in terms of efficiency and reduction of heteroduplex formation, TTGE migration conditions and bacterial identification from TTGE patterns, was performed. The optimized protocol was used for the subsequent analysis of 14 stool samples comparatively to a culture-based method. We showed that a specifically designed ladder representative of the diversity of the studied microflora is a useful tool for the identification of bacterial taxa despite biases inherent to 16S rRNA genes, including intra-genomic heterogeneity. Cultivation and PCR-TTGE gave congruent results but cultivation was more efficient for the detection of minor populations whereas PCR-TTGE gave a more complete description of the major populations. Finally, we demonstrated the reliability, the detection sensitivity and the convenience of the optimized 16S rDNA PCR-TTGE method compared with cultural approaches for studying the premature neonate gut microbiota.
    Journal of microbiological methods 11/2009; 79(2-79):156-165. DOI:10.1016/j.mimet.2009.08.005 · 2.10 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "y , bacteria of the large intestine respond to changes in diet , especially to the type and quantity of dietary carbohydrate . One of the main consequences of increased carbohydrate intake is to decrease the pH of the gut lumen , significantly altering bacterial metabolism and commensal prevalence ( Sonnenburg et al . 2006 ; Martens et al . 2008 ; Underwood et al . 2009 ) . Mammals lack the ability to degrade complex poly - saccharides , but actively transport simple dietary sugars , like glucose , through the small intestinal enterocytes . The undigested polysaccharides transit to portions of the GI tract where the bacterial colonization is heavier ( ileum , colon ) and composed of large families of f"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Eukaryotes and prokaryotes have developed mutually beneficial relationships over millennia of evolutionary adaptation. Bacteria in our gut rely on our diet and the protected environment of our bodies just as our health depends on byproducts of microbial metabolism. Microorganisms of the gut microbiota ferment carbohydrates into short-chain fatty acids, convert dietary and endogenous nitrogenous compounds into ammonia and microbial protein, and synthesize and activate B vitamins and vitamin K. The benefit from their activity is multiplex and translates into increased energy for the gut epithelial cells, balanced absorption of salt and water, nitrogen recycling, breakdown of complex lipids and cholesterol, and detoxification of waste compounds.
    The Journal of Physiology 08/2009; 587(Pt 17):4169-74. DOI:10.1113/jphysiol.2009.176370 · 4.54 Impact Factor
Show more