Article
Design and evaluation of thin and flexible theophylline imprinted polymer membrane materials.
Welsh School of Pharmacy, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3NB, UK.
Journal of Molecular Recognition (impact factor:
3.31).
01/2009;
22(3):223-31.
DOI:10.1002/jmr.935
pp.223-31
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
- Cited In (1)
-
Article: To Remove or Not to Remove? The Challenge of Extracting the Template to Make the Cavities Available in Molecularly Imprinted Polymers (MIPs).
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Template removal is a critical step in the preparation of most molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs). The polymer network itself and the affinity of the imprinted cavities for the template make its removal hard. If there are remaining template molecules in the MIPs, less cavities will be available for rebinding, which decreases efficiency. Furthermore, if template bleeding occurs during analytical applications, errors will arise. Despite the relevance to the MIPs performance, template removal has received scarce attention and is currently the least cost-effective step of the MIP development. Attempts to reach complete template removal may involve the use of too drastic conditions in conventional extraction techniques, resulting in the damage or the collapse of the imprinted cavities. Advances in the extraction techniques in the last decade may provide optimized tools. The aim of this review is to analyze the available data on the efficiency of diverse extraction techniques for template removal, paying attention not only to the removal yield but also to MIPs performance. Such an analysis is expected to be useful for opening a way to rational approaches for template removal (minimizing the costs of solvents and time) instead of the current trial-and-error methods.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 01/2011; 12(7):4327-47. · 2.60 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
14% cross-linker
batch-rebinding studies
binding
binding capabilities
binding sites
complex multi-layered system
diffusion able molecularly imprinted polymeric matrix
good template accessibility
ligand-occupied binding site population
membrane flexiblity
MIP films
non-covalent molecular imprinting approach
non-covalent molecularly imprinted system
physical characteristics
poly(tri-ethyleneglycol dimethyacrylate-co-methyl methacrylate-co-methacrylic acid)
Scanning electron microscopy images
Selectivity studies
specific binding
specific surface area
tolerant molecularly imprinted thin films