Child-therapist alliance and clinical outcomes in cognitive behavioral therapy for child anxiety disorders.

Franz Hall Psychology Clinic, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 5.67). 11/2008; 50(6):751-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01996.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Few studies have examined the link between child-therapist alliance and outcome in manual-guided cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for children diagnosed with anxiety disorders. This study sought to clarify the nature and strength of this relation.
The Therapy Process Observational Coding System for Child Psychotherapy - Alliance scale (TPOCS-A; McLeod, 2005) was used to assess the quality of the child-therapist alliance. Coders independently rated 123 CBT therapy sessions conducted with 34 children (aged 6-13 years) diagnosed with anxiety disorders. Parents reported on children's symptomatology at pre- mid-, and post-treatment.
A stronger child-therapist alliance early in treatment predicted greater improvement in parent-reported outcomes at mid-treatment but not post-treatment. However, improvement in the child-therapist alliance over the course of treatment predicted better post-treatment outcomes.
The quality of the child-therapist alliance assessed early in treatment may be differentially associated with symptom reduction at mid- and post-treatment. Results underscore the importance of assessing the relation between alliance and outcome over the course of therapy to clarify the role the child-therapist alliance plays in child psychotherapy.

1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Studies exploring the association between alliance and outcome in youth cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) have yielded inconsistent results based upon whose perspective is measured. The current study explored the degree to which youth with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision, anxiety disorders and their therapists agree in their ratings of the alliance at multiple assessment points and evaluated whether inter-rater discrepancies predicted treatment outcome. Youth (N = 62; Mage = 12.43, SD = .76) received empirically supported CBT. Paired samples t tests assessed for significant disagreement between youth- and therapist-rated alliance at sessions 4, 8, and 12. Regression analyses were conducted to evaluate whether discrepancies between raters at each time point predicted posttreatment anxiety symptom scores. Overall, alliance was positive for both child (aged 7-12 years) and adolescent (aged 13-16 yers) clients. Discrepancies between youth and therapist ratings of alliance were statistically significant at session 4 for children and session 8 for adolescents, with youth rating the relationship more favorably than therapists. However, rating discrepancies did not predict youth- or parent-reported treatment outcome. Considerable variability may exist between youth and therapist perspectives on the therapeutic alliance, indicating potential attunement problems, particularly during earlier phases of treatment. However, these discrepancies did not negatively affect treatment response. Implications for alliance research and clinical practice are discussed. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Journal of Clinical Psychology 02/2015; DOI:10.1002/jclp.22167 · 2.12 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The importance of patients' perspectives in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is increasingly emphasized in recent years. However, qualitative evidence regarding these perspectives, is not systematically included in treatment guidelines. The possibilities of adding systematically aggregated recipients' views are examined in this paper, with a focus on children and adolescents. We reanalyzed a qualitative synthesis of the experiences of traumatized youth in order to derive recommendations for treatment. These recommendations were juxtaposed to 3 leading international sets of guidelines for children's treatment that stem from a quantitatively dominated evidence base. We found congruence between the 2 evidence bases regarding the broad impact of trauma, the importance of routines, and the involvement of parents in therapy. The yield of the qualitative synthesis comprised children's feeling of being both normal and different, their need for a vigorous posttrauma identity, the importance of building relationships with significant others, and the importance of providing children with something to "hold on to." The inclusion of both quantitative and qualitative sources of evidence holds the promise of better tailoring treatment to recipients' needs.
    Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy 09/2014; 6(5):546-554. DOI:10.1037/a0035172 · 0.89 Impact Factor
  • Source

Full-text (3 Sources)

Available from
May 29, 2014