Valoración de opciones reales: Dificultades, problemas y errores

IESE Business School, IESE Research Papers 01/2008;
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT Las f�rmulas de valoraci�n de opciones financieras se basan en el arbitraje (la posibilidad de formar una cartera r�plica, esto es, que proporciona unos flujos id�nticos a los de la opci�n financiera) y son muy exactas. Sin embargo, veremos que muy pocas veces tiene sentido utilizar directamente estas f�rmulas para valorar opciones reales, porque las opciones reales no son casi nunca replicables. Sin embargo, podemos modificar las f�rmulas para tener en cuenta la no replicabilidad. Los problemas con los que nos encontramos al valorar opciones reales son: 1) dificultad para definir los par�metros necesarios para valorar las opciones reales; 2) dificultad para definir y cuantificar la volatilidad de las fuentes de incertidumbre, y 3) dificultad para calibrar la exclusividad de la opci�n. Estos tres factores hacen que la valoraci�n de las opciones reales sea, en general, dif�cil, y casi siempre much�simo menos exacta y m�s cuestionable que la valoraci�n de las opciones financieras. Adem�s, es mucho m�s dif�cil comunicar la valoraci�n de las opciones reales que la de un proyecto de inversi�n ordinario, por su mayor complejidad t�cnica.

1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper develops a model of the optimal investment strategy for a firm confronted with a sequence of technological innovations. We incorporate many of the most important characteristics of real-world technology markets. For example, we permit innovations to be stochastic in their arrival times and their profitability. We also incorporate learning so that firms adopting current innovations become better able to benefit from future innovations. The model yields four distinct investment strategies. The model is then used to predict actual firm policy. These implications are discussed and compared with observed firm behavior.
    Journal of Financial Economics 01/1995; 44(3-44):397-416. DOI:10.1016/S0304-405X(97)00009-3 · 3.72 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Journal of Political Economy 02/1973; 81(3):637-54. DOI:10.1086/260062 · 2.90 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The current interest in real options reflects the dramatic increase in the uncertainty of the business environment. Viewed narrowly, the real options approach is the extension of financial option pricing models to the valuation of options on real (that is, nonfinancial) assets. More broadly, the real options approach is a way of thinking that helps managers formulate their strategic options—the future opportunities that are created by today's investments—while considering their likely effect on shareholder value. But if the real options framework promises to link strategy more closely to shareholder value creation, there are some major challenges on the frontier of application. In the first part of this paper, the authors tackle the question, “What is really new about real options, and how does the approach differ from other wellestablished ways to make strategic decisions under uncertainty?” This article provides a specific definition of real options that relies on the ability to track marketpriced risk. Using examples from oil exploration and pharmaceutical drug development, the authors also show how specific features of the industry and the application itself determine the usefulness of the real options approach. The second part of the paper addresses the question: Given the many differences between real and financial options, how should a real options application be framed? The authors examine the use of real options in the valuation of Internet companies to demonstrate the required judgment and tradeoffs in the framing of real options applications. The case of Webvan, an online grocer, is used to illustrate the inter-action between strategy, execution, and valuation.
    Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 06/2000; 13(2):15-28. DOI:10.1111/j.1745-6622.2000.tb00051.x


Available from