Effective sensitization of temozolomide by ABT-888 is lost with development of temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma xenograft lines

Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics (Impact Factor: 5.68). 02/2009; 8(2):407-14. DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-0854
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Resistance to temozolomide and radiotherapy is a major problem for patients with glioblastoma but may be overcome using the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor ABT-888. Using two primary glioblastoma xenografts, the efficacy of ABT-888 combined with radiotherapy and/or temozolomide was evaluated. Treatment with ABT-888 combined with temozolomide resulted in significant survival prolongation (GBM12: 55.1%, P = 0.005; GBM22: 54.4%, P = 0.043). ABT-888 had no effect with radiotherapy alone but significantly enhanced survival in GBM12 when combined with concurrent radiotherapy/temozolomide. With multicycle therapy, ABT-888 further extended the survival benefit of temozolomide in the inherently sensitive GBM12 and GBM22 xenograft lines. However, after in vivo selection for temozolomide resistance, the derivative GBM12TMZ and GBM22TMZ lines were no longer sensitized by ABT-888 in combination with temozolomide, and a similar lack of efficacy was observed in two other temozolomide-resistant tumor lines. Thus, the sensitizing effects of ABT-888 were limited to tumor lines that have not been previously exposed to temozolomide, and these results suggest that patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma may be more likely to respond to combined temozolomide/poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor therapy than patients with recurrent disease.

Download full-text


Available from: Nicola J Curtin, Sep 27, 2015
12 Reads
    • "Notwithstanding, sensitization of ABT-888 in combination with temozolomide in xenograft tumour models of glioblastoma seems to have a very limited effect in temozolomideresistant cell lines [176]. The bioavailability of the drug was assessed in a phase 0 clinical trial with 13 patients enrolled with dosage ranging from 10 to 50 mg twice daily. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: ADP-ribosylation or PARsylation is one of the most abundant modifications of proteins and DNA. Although the usual context for PARsylation involves the detection and repair of DNA damage in the cell, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases are known to regulate a number of biological processes besides maintaining genome integrity. One of these processes is the assembly and maintenance of the mitotic spindle where the presence of PARP-1 and tankyrase 1 (TNKS1), two of the best-characterized members of the PARP superfamily, is of critical importance. Here, we recapitulate the biological implications of the absence of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases and depletion of PARsylation occurrence in mitosis in order to better understand the antimitotic effects of PARP inhibitors. In this regard, we also present an overview of the existing and more relevant molecules, with a special attention to the historical development of their pharmacological properties and structures, as well as a brief summary of clinical trials involving PARP inhibitors.
    Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry 11/2014; 14(20). DOI:10.2174/1568026614666141130100641 · 3.40 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The effectiveness of disabling BER by the use of PARP inhibitors for treatment in conjunction with alkylatin therapy for glioblastoma and for other tumors as well is not clear, however several clinical trials are ongoing ( [62,63]. Parthanatos, a unique form of PARP-1 mediated cell death, similarly requires PAR transport of AIF to the nucleus after alkylation treatment. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The major dilemma of cancer chemotherapy has always been a double-edged sword, producing resistance in tumor cells and life-threatening destruction of nontumorigenic tissue. Glioblastoma is the most common form of primary brain tumor, with median survival at 14 months after surgery, radiation and temozolomide (monofunctional alkylator) therapy. Treatment failure is most often due to temozolomide-resistant tumor growth. The underlying basis for development of tumor cell resistance to temozolomide instead of death is not understood. Our current results demonstrate that both cervical carcinoma (HeLa MR) and glioblastoma (U251) tumor cells exposed to an equivalent chemotherapeutic concentration of a monofunctional alkylator undergo multiple cell cycles, maintenance of metabolic activity, and a prolonged time to death that involves accumulation of Apoptosis Inducing Factor (AIF) within the nucleus. A minority of the tumor cell population undergoes senescence, with minimal caspase cleavage. Surviving tumor cells are comprised of a very small subpopulation of individual cells that eventually resume proliferation, out of which resistant cells emerge. In contrast, normal human cells (MCF12A) exposed to a monofunctional alkylator undergo an immediate decrease in metabolic activity and subsequent senescence. A minority of the normal cell population undergoes cell death by the caspase cleavage pathway. All cytotoxic events occur within the first cell cycle in nontumorigenic cells. In summation, we have demonstrated that two different highly malignant tumor cell lines slowly undergo very altered cellular and temporal responses to chemotherapeutic monofunctional alkylation, as compared to rapid responses of normal cells. In the clinic, this produces resistance and growth of tumor cells, cytotoxicity of normal cells, and death of the patient.
    PLoS ONE 09/2013; 8(9):e74071. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0074071 · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "To date, only one preclinical study has looked at the trimodal combination of PARP inhibitor ABT-888 with TMZ and X-rays in GBM xenografts [9]. The present in vitro study suggests that ABT-888 enhances the effects of radiation. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background The cytotoxicity of radiotherapy and chemotherapy can be enhanced by modulating DNA repair. PARP is a family of enzymes required for an efficient base-excision repair of DNA single-strand breaks and inhibition of PARP can prevent the repair of these lesions. The current study investigates the trimodal combination of ABT-888, a potent inhibitor of PARP1-2, ionizing radiation and temozolomide(TMZ)-based chemotherapy in glioblastoma (GBM) cells. Methods Four human GBM cell lines were treated for 5 h with 5 μM ABT-888 before being exposed to X-rays concurrently with TMZ at doses of 5 or 10 μM for 2 h. ABT-888′s PARP inhibition was measured using immunodetection of poly(ADP-ribose) (pADPr). Cell survival and the different cell death pathways were examined via clonogenic assay and morphological characterization of the cell and cell nucleus. Results Combining ABT-888 with radiation yielded enhanced cell killing in all four cell lines, as demonstrated by a sensitizer enhancement ratio at 50% survival (SER50) ranging between 1.12 and 1.37. Radio- and chemo-sensitization was further enhanced when ABT-888 was combined with both X-rays and TMZ in the O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT)-methylated cell lines with a SER50 up to 1.44. This effect was also measured in one of the MGMT-unmethylated cell lines with a SER50 value of 1.30. Apoptosis induction by ABT-888, TMZ and X-rays was also considered and the effect of ABT-888 on the number of apoptotic cells was noticeable at later time points. In addition, this work showed that ABT-888 mediated sensitization is replication dependent, thus demonstrating that this effect might be more pronounced in tumour cells in which endogenous replication lesions are present in a larger proportion than in normal cells. Conclusions This study suggests that ABT-888 has the clinical potential to enhance the current standard treatment for GBM, in combination with conventional chemo-radiotherapy. Interestingly, our results suggest that the use of PARP inhibitors might be clinically significant in those patients whose tumour is MGMT-unmethylated and currently derive less benefit from TMZ.
    Radiation Oncology 03/2013; 8(1):65. DOI:10.1186/1748-717X-8-65 · 2.55 Impact Factor
Show more