A Retrospective Performance Assessment of the Developmental Neurotoxicity Study in Support of OECD Test Guideline 426

Office of Research and Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment, U.S Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460-0001, USA.
Environmental Health Perspectives (Impact Factor: 7.98). 02/2009; 117(1):17-25. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.11447
Source: PubMed


We conducted a review of the history and performance of developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) testing in support of the finalization and implementation of Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) DNT test guideline 426 (TG 426).

Information sources and analysis
In this review we summarize extensive scientific efforts that form the foundation for this testing paradigm, including basic neurotoxicology research, interlaboratory collaborative studies, expert workshops, and validation studies, and we address the relevance, applicability, and use of the DNT study in risk assessment.

The OECD DNT guideline represents the best available science for assessing the potential for DNT in human health risk assessment, and data generated with this protocol are relevant and reliable for the assessment of these end points. The test methods used have been subjected to an extensive history of international validation, peer review, and evaluation, which is contained in the public record. The reproducibility, reliability, and sensitivity of these methods have been demonstrated, using a wide variety of test substances, in accordance with OECD guidance on the validation and international acceptance of new or updated test methods for hazard characterization. Multiple independent, expert scientific peer reviews affirm these conclusions.

Download full-text


Available from: Sandra Allen, Oct 09, 2015
1 Follower
60 Reads
  • Source
    • "Considering that only 100 or so chemicals have actually been tested using regulatory DNT guidelines (Makris et al. 2009), the challenge facing the field of DNT testing is daunting. An alternative to currently available regulatory test methods that reduces both time and costs while maintaining or improving our understanding of DNT potential is urgently needed. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A major problem in developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) risk assessment is the lack of toxicological hazard information for most compounds. Therefore, new approaches are being considered to provide adequate experimental data that allow regulatory decisions. This process requires a matching of regulatory needs on the one hand and the opportunities provided by new test systems and methods on the other hand. Alignment of academically and industrially driven assay development with regulatory needs in the field of DNT is a core mission of the International STakeholder NETwork (ISTNET) in DNT testing. The first meeting of ISTNET was held in Zurich on 23-24 January 2014 in order to explore the concept of adverse outcome pathway (AOP) to practical DNT testing. AOPs were considered promising tools to promote test systems development according to regulatory needs. Moreover, the AOP concept was identified as an important guiding principle to assemble predictive integrated testing strategies (ITSs) for DNT. The recommendations on a road map towards AOP-based DNT testing is considered a stepwise approach, operating initially with incomplete AOPs for compound grouping, and focussing on key events of neurodevelopment. Next steps to be considered in follow-up activities are the use of case studies to further apply the AOP concept in regulatory DNT testing, making use of AOP intersections (common key events) for economic development of screening assays, and addressing the transition from qualitative descriptions to quantitative network modelling.
    Archive für Toxikologie 01/2015; 89(2). DOI:10.1007/s00204-015-1464-2 · 5.98 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Thus, the use of these tests in regulatory science has been suggested by international, national, and private sectors. However, there have been some controversies on the test methods with respect to the sensitivity and specificity of the neurotoxicity tests, the kinds of endpoints that should be included, the complexity of the test protocol, and the large variability of some endpoints (Kuwagata 2012; Makris et al. 2009). The scientific literature used to derive the acceptable daily intake or tolerable daily intake values is limited. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The prevalence of cognitive abnormalities in children has partly been ascribed to environmental chemical exposure. Appropriate animal models and tools for evaluating higher brain function are required to examine this problem. A recently developed behavioral test in which rats learn six unique flavor-location pairs in a test arena was used to evaluate paired-associate learning, a hallmark of the higher cognitive function that is essential to language learning in humans. Pregnant Long-Evans rats were dosed by gavage with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) or 2,3,7,8-tetrabromodibenzo-p-dioxin (TBDD) at a dose of 0, 200, or 800 ng/kg (referred as Control, TCDD-200, TCDD-800, TBDD-200, or TBDD-800, hereafter) on gestational day 15, and the offspring was tested during adulthood. Paired-associate learning was found to be impaired in the TCDD-200 and TBDD-200 groups, but not in either group exposed to 800 ng/kg, the observations of which were ensured by non-cued trials. As for the emotional aspect, during habituation, the TCDD-200 and TBDD-200 groups showed significantly longer latencies to enter the test arena from a start box than the Control, TCDD-800, and TBDD-800 groups, suggesting that the TCDD-200 and TBDD-200 groups manifested anxiety-like behavior. Thus, both the chlorinated dioxin and its brominated congener affected higher brain function to a similar extent in a nearly identical manner. Use of the behavioral test that can evaluate paired-associate learning in rats demonstrated that in utero and lactational exposure to not only TCDD but also TBDD perturbed higher brain function in rat offspring in a nonmonotonic manner. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00204-013-1161-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
    Archives of Toxicology 11/2013; 88(3). DOI:10.1007/s00204-013-1161-y · 5.98 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The results from DNT studies are indeed used for hazard/risk assessment purposes, and in addition some regulatory agencies have also, on a case-by-case basis, incorporated an additional database uncertainty factor into their regulatory decisions because of the absence of DNT data. This approach reflects the regulator views that DNT data are valuable in refining permissible exposure levels and that the absence of these data can increase the uncertainty about the toxicity of chemicals (Makris et al., 2009). On average, a DNT study according to OECD TG 426 requires 1400 animals (Rovida and Hartung, 2009), costs 1.1 million euro (Fleischer, 2007) and takes 1–2 years to complete (Radio et al., 2008). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The developmental neurotoxic potential of the majority of environmental chemicals and drugs is currently undetermined. Specific in vivo studies provide useful data for hazard assessment but are not amenable to screen thousands of untested compounds. In this study, methods which use zebrafish embryos, eleutheroembryos and larvae as model organisms, were proposed as alternatives for developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) testing. The evaluation of spontaneous tail coilings in zebrafish embryos aged 24-26hours post fertilization (hpf) and the swimming activity of eleutheroembryos at 120 and larvae at 144 hpf, i.e. parameters for locomotor activity, were investigated as potential endpoints for DNT testing, according to available standard protocols. The overall performance and predictive value of these methods was then examined by testing a training set of 10 compounds, including known developmental neurotoxicants and compounds not considered to be neurotoxic. The classification of the selected compounds as either neurotoxic or non-neurotoxic, based on effects observed in zebrafish embryos and larvae, was compared to available mammalian data and an overall concordance of 90% was achieved. Furthermore, the specificity of the selected endpoints for DNT was evaluated as well as the potential similarities between zebrafish and mammals with regard to mechanisms of action for the selected compounds. Although further studies, including the screening of a large testing set of compounds are required, we suggest that the proposed methods with zebrafish embryos and larvae might be valuable alternatives for animal testing for the screening and prioritization of compounds for DNT.
    Neurotoxicology and Teratology 01/2013; 37. DOI:10.1016/ · 2.76 Impact Factor
Show more