Central Venous Access: Evolving Roles of Radiology and Other Specialties Nationally Over Two Decades

Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute, Reston, Virginia, USA. Electronic address: .
Journal of the American College of Radiology: JACR (Impact Factor: 2.84). 06/2013; 10(8). DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.02.002
Source: PubMed

The aim of this study was to evaluate national trends in central venous access (CVA) procedures over 2 decades with regard to changing specialty group roles and places of service.

Aggregated claims data for temporary central venous catheter and long-term CVA device (CVAD) procedures were extracted from Medicare Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary Master Files from 1992 through 2011. Central venous catheter and CVAD procedure volumes by specialty group and place of service were studied.

Between 1992 and 2011, temporary and long-term CVA placement procedures increased from 638,703 to 808,071 (+27%) and from 76,444 to 316,042 (+313%), respectively. For temporary central venous catheters, radiology (from 0.4% in 1992 to 32.6% in 2011) now exceeds anesthesiology (from 37% to 22%) and surgery (from 30.4% to 11.7%) as the dominant provider group. Surgery continues to dominate in placement and explantation of long-term CVADs (from 80.7% to 50.4% and from 81.6% to 47.7%, respectively), but radiology's share has grown enormously (from 0.7% to 37.6% and from 0.2% to 28.6%). Although volumes remain small (<10% of all procedures), midlevel practitioners have experienced >100-fold growth for most services. The inpatient hospital remains the dominant site for temporary CVA procedures (90.0% in 1992 and 81.2% in 2011), but the placement of long-term CVADs has shifted from the inpatient (from 68.9% to 45.2%) to hospital outpatient (from 26.9% to 44.3%) setting. In all hospital settings combined, radiologists place approximately half of all tunneled catheters and three-quarters all peripherally inserted central catheters.

Over the past 2 decades, CVA procedures on Medicare beneficiaries have increased considerably. Radiology is now the dominant overall provider.

Download full-text


Available from: Danny R. Hughes, Dec 19, 2013
35 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The publisher regrets that this article has been temporarily removed. A replacement will appear as soon as possible in which the reason for the removal of the article will be specified, or the article will be reinstated. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at Copyright © 2014 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Journal of the American College of Radiology: JACR 10/2014; 12(3). DOI:10.1016/j.jacr.2014.08.021 · 2.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate national trends in percutaneous hepatic and renal biopsy procedures with regard to utilization, specialty group roles, and sites of service. Service-specific claims data for percutaneous hepatic and renal biopsy procedures were identified using Medicare Physician Supplier Procedure Summary Master Files for the period 1994-2012. Longitudinal national utilization rates were calculated using annual Medicare enrollment data. Procedure volumes by specialty group and site of service were analyzed. Between 1994 and 2012, the number of hepatic and renal biopsies performed on Medicare Part B beneficiaries increased 22% (from 43,478 to 53,055) and 68% (19,508 to 32,762), respectively. Per 100,000 beneficiaries, the utilization of hepatic and renal biopsy increased 19.6% (from 134.6 to 161.0) and 69.3% (from 60.4 to 102.2). Procedures performed by radiologists disproportionately increased 81% (from 25,484 to 46,181) and 236% (from 6,855 to 23,003), respectively. Although utilization in the inpatient setting declined 28.7% (from 68.2 to 48.6 per 100,000) for hepatic biopsies and 9.4% (from 43.1 to 39.1) for renal biopsies, there were larger concurrent increases of 73.9% (from 59.2 to 103.0) and 303.9% (from 15.1 to 61.0) in utilization in the outpatient setting. Between 1994 and 2012, national utilization of percutaneous hepatic and renal biopsy procedures in the Medicare population increased as services increasingly shifted from the hospital inpatient to outpatient setting. Radiologists are presently and increasingly the dominant providers of both services. Copyright © 2015 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR 03/2015; 26(5). DOI:10.1016/j.jvir.2015.01.010 · 2.41 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in diagnostic radiology resident and fellow workloads in recent years. Berenson-Eggers Type of Service categorization was applied to Medicare Part B Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary Master Files to identify total and resident-specific claims for radiologist imaging services between 1998 and 2010. Data were extracted and subgroup analytics performed by modality. Volumes were annually normalized for active diagnostic radiology trainees. From 1998 to 2010, Medicare claims for imaging services rendered by radiologists increased from 78,901,255 to 105,252,599 (+33.4%). Service volumes increased across all modalities: for radiography from 55,661,683 to 59,654,659 (+7.2%), for mammography from 5,780,624 to 6,570,673 (+13.7%), for ultrasound from 5,851,864 to 9,853,459 (+68.4%), for CT from 9,351,780 to 22,527,488 (+140.9%), and for MR from 2,255,304 to 6,646,320 (+194.7%). Total trainee services nationally increased 3 times as rapidly. On an average per trainee basis, however, the average number of diagnostic services rendered annually to Medicare Part B beneficiaries increased from 499 to 629 (+26.1%). By modality, this represents an average change from 333 to 306 examinations (-8.1%) for radiography, from 20 to 18 (-7.4%) for mammography, from 37 to 56 (+49.7%) for ultrasound, from 88 to 202 (+129.1%) for CT, and from 20 to 47 (+132.0%) for MRI. Between 1998 and 2010, the number of imaging examinations interpreted by diagnostic radiology residents and fellows on Medicare beneficiaries increased on average by 26% per trainee, with growth largely accounted for by disproportionate increases in more complex services (CT and MRI). Copyright © 2015 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Journal of the American College of Radiology: JACR 05/2015; 12(7). DOI:10.1016/j.jacr.2015.02.009 · 2.84 Impact Factor
Show more

Similar Publications