Horizontal gene transfer between Wolbachia and the mosquito Aedes aegypti

Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
BMC Genomics (Impact Factor: 3.99). 02/2009; 10(1):33. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-33
Source: PubMed


The evolutionary importance of horizontal gene transfer (HGT) from Wolbachia endosymbiotic bacteria to their eukaryotic hosts is a topic of considerable interest and debate. Recent transfers of genome fragments from Wolbachia into insect chromosomes have been reported, but it has been argued that these fragments may be on an evolutionary trajectory to degradation and loss.
We have discovered a case of HGT, involving two adjacent genes, between the genomes of Wolbachia and the currently Wolbachia-uninfected mosquito Aedes aegypti, an important human disease vector. The lower level of sequence identity between Wolbachia and insect, the transcription of all the genes involved, and the fact that we have identified homologs of the two genes in another Aedes species (Ae. mascarensis), suggest that these genes are being expressed after an extended evolutionary period since horizontal transfer, and therefore that the transfer has functional significance. The association of these genes with Wolbachia prophage regions also provides a mechanism for the transfer.
The data support the argument that HGT between Wolbachia endosymbiotic bacteria and their hosts has produced evolutionary innovation.

Download full-text


Available from: Lisa Klasson,

Click to see the full-text of:

Article: Horizontal gene transfer between Wolbachia and the mosquito Aedes aegypti

4.1 MB

See full-text
  • Source
    • "The quality-controlled raw reads were then realigned to a reference genome using the program BWA-MEM version 0.7.10 (Li 2013) using default parameters. Currently, a highquality wAna genome is unavailable, so we used the reference genome sequence of W. pipientis infecting Drosophila simulans strain Riverside (wRi) (Klasson, Westberg, et al. 2009). A previous study has shown high nucleotide identity between the genomes of wAna and wRi (Salzberg et al. 2005). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Coevolution between Drosophila and its endosymbiont Wolbachia pipientis has many intriguing aspects. For example, Drosophila ananassae hosts two forms of W. pipientis genomes: one being the infectious bacterial genome and the other integrated into the host nuclear genome. Here, we characterize the infectious and integrated genomes of W. pipientis infecting D. ananassae (wAna), by genome sequencing 15 strains of D. ananassae that have either the infectious or integrated wAna genomes. Results indicate evolutionarily stable maternal transmission for the infectious wAna genome suggesting a relatively long-term coevolution with its host. In contrast, the integrated wAna genome showed pseudogene-like characteristics accumulating many variants that are predicted to have deleterious effects if present in an infectious bacterial genome. Phylogenomic analysis of sequence variation together with genotyping by PCR of large structural variations indicated several wAna variants among the 8 infectious wAna genomes. In contrast, only a single wAna variant was found among the 7 integrated wAna genomes examined in lines from Africa, south Asia, and south Pacific islands suggesting that the integration occurred once from a single infectious wAna genome and then spread geographically. Further analysis revealed that for all D. ananassae we examined with the integrated wAna genomes, the majority of the integrated wAna genomic regions are represented in at least two copies suggesting a double integration or single integration followed by an integrated genome duplication. The possible evolutionary mechanism underlying the widespread geographical presence of the duplicate integration of the wAna genome is an intriguing question remaining to be answered. © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution.
    Genome Biology and Evolution 08/2015; 7(8). DOI:10.1093/gbe/evv158 · 4.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The advent of highthroughput , meta-omic techniques ranging from metagenomics to metabolomics has exposed the large number of genes, transcripts, proteins and metabolites that compose the intricate web formed between the host and its inner ecosystem. Many interesting theories are now being discussed and explored regarding the hologenomic basis of speciation (Rosenberg & Zilber-Rosenberg 2011, Brucker & Bordenstein 2013) and how bacteria and viruses may have shaped and continue to impact the genome architecture and phenotypes of harbouring organisms (Gorski et al. 2003, Crochu et al. 2004, Nikoh et al. 2008, Klasson et al. 2009, Rosario & Breitbart 2011, Ni et al. 2012 "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Anophelines harbour a diverse microbial consortium that may represent an extended gene pool for the host. The proposed effects of the insect microbiota span physiological, metabolic and immune processes. Here we synthesise how current metagenomic tools combined with classical culture-dependent techniques provide new insights in the elucidation of the role of the Anopheles-associated microbiota. Many proposed malaria control strategies have been based upon the immunomodulating effects that the bacterial components of the microbiota appear to exert and their ability to express anti-Plasmodium peptides. The number of identified bacterial taxa has increased in the cur-rent "omics" era and the available data are mostly scattered or in "tables" that are difficult to exploit. Published microbiota reports for multiple anopheline species were compiled in an Excel ® spreadsheet. We then filtered the microbiota data using a continent-oriented criterion and generated a visual correlation showing the exclusive and shared bacterial genera among four continents. The data suggested the existence of a core group of bacteria associ-ated in a stable manner with their anopheline hosts. However, the lack of data from Neotropical vectors may reduce the possibility of defining the core microbiota and understanding the mosquito-bacteria interactive consortium.
    Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 08/2014; 109(5):672-684. DOI:10.1590/0074-0276140194 · 1.59 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "In order to ensure the parasite being successfully transmitted maternally, Wolbachia tend to alter reproduction properties of their host [4] . Common alteration that have been reported are male killing, feminization, parthenogenesis and cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) [5] [6] . Wolbachia modifies the spermatogenesis causing no viable offspring to be produced when infected male mates with uninfected female or female infected differently from the male [7] . "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: To develop an artificial and modified Wolbachia removal technique using tetracycline from naturally Wolbachia infected Aedes albopictus (Ae. albopictus) so as to be able to produce generations of Wolbachia free offsprings. Methods: In this study, seven different tetracycline treatment methods were conducted to obtain the best removal method. Four methods focused on larvae tetracycline treatment, one method on both larvae and adult tetracycline treatment and the last two methods on adult mosquito sucrose treatment. Results: All larval tetracycline treatments resulted in either high larvae mortality, sterile F0 adult mosquitoes or unsuccessful Wolbachia removal. Treatment of both larvae and adults resulted in reduced larvae mortality, successful Wolbachia removal but slow mosquito fecundity. As for the adult treatment, 1.0 mg/mL as previously published was not able to completely remove Wolbachia in F1 generation whereas 1.25 mg/mL successfully removed Wolbachia from F1 and F2 mosquitoes in 2 weeks. Conclusions: This method is different from the previously published methods as it provides an improved Wolbachia removal technique from Ae. albopictus with high egg hatchability, low larvae mortality, increased fecundity and better Wolbachia removal rate.
    Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine 07/2014; 4(7):557-60. DOI:10.12980/APJTB.4.2014APJTB-2014-0020
Show more