Inherited antithrombin deficiency: a review.

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Haemophilia (Impact Factor: 2.47). 12/2008; 14(6):1229-39. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2008.01830.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Antithrombin (AT) is a potent inactivator of thrombin and factor Xa and the major inhibitor of blood coagulation. Inherited AT deficiencies are uncommon, with prevalences in the general population between 1 in 500 and 1 in 5000. They are either quantitative (type I) or qualitative (type II). Type II is subdivided into the more common, but less thrombogenic, type IIb deficiency caused by a defect in the heparin-binding region of AT and the less common, but more thrombophilic, type IIa variant caused by mutations in the thrombin-binding site. A pleiotropic type IIc deficiency also exists. In the evaluation of a thrombophilic individual, a functional AT assay (AT activity) should be used and the diagnosis of AT deficiency only established after acquired causes have been ruled out and repeat AT testing on an additional sample has been performed. A subsequent antigenic AT assay result leads to differentiation between type I and type II deficiency. Further specialized tests help subclassify the type II deficiencies, but this is typically not carried out for clinical purposes, even though it might be helpful to assess thrombosis risk. AT deficiency is associated with an increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and pregnancy loss. The association with arterial thrombosis is only weak. VTE prophylaxis and treatment management will be discussed in this article and existing treatment guidelines presented. The lack of data surrounding the use of AT concentrates and the resulting ambiguity as to when to use such concentrates will be discussed.

1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: To characterize antithrombin (AT) levels in normal pregnancy. Methods: We performed secondary analyses with data from 3 studies. Using a single measurement from each subject in the first analysis (cross-sectional), we correlated AT levels with gestational age from the middle of the second trimester throughout the third trimester of pregnancy. Using serial measurements in a second analysis (cohort), we compared AT levels between the late first and second trimesters of pregnancy and baseline (the level at 6 weeks postpartum). Using serial measurements in a third analysis (cohort), we analyzed the pattern of change in AT levels in the immediate postpartum period. Assays of AT activity were performed using the Dade Behring (Siemens) Berichrom Antithrombin III Chromogenic Assay. AT levels were correlated with gestational age using the Pearson correlation coefficient and compared between the different time points using one-way ANOVA. Results: Overall, AT levels were 20% lower than baseline during pregnancy (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference between AT levels obtained between late first trimester and late second trimester. From midtrimester to term, however, AT levels were negatively correlated with gestational age with a 13% drop during this period of time (r = -0.26 [-0.39, -0.11]; p < 0.01). Immediately after childbirth, AT levels fell precipitously to 30% below baseline (p < 0.05) and reached a nadir 12 hours postpartum before rising and returning to baseline by 72 hours postpartum. Conclusion: It appears that antithrombin (AT) is consumed at the time of delivery. Our findings have implications for AT replacement or even anticoagulation at the time of delivery. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
    Thrombosis Research 07/2014; 134(3). DOI:10.1016/j.thromres.2014.07.025 · 2.43 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives: In hereditary antithrombin (AT) deficiency it is important to determine the underlying mutation since the future risk of thromboembolism varies considerably between mutations. DNA investigations are in general thought of as flawless and irrevocable, but the diagnostic approach can be critical. We therefore investigated mutation results in the AT gene, SERPINC1, with two different approaches. Design and methods: Sixteen patients referred to the Centre for Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Odense University Hospital, with biochemical indications of AT deficiency, but with a negative denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) mutation screening (routine approach until recently) were included. As an alternative mutation analysis, direct sequencing of all exons and exon-intron boundaries without pre-selection by DHPLC was performed. Results: Out of sixteen patients with a negative DHPLC mutation screening, discordant results were found in ten patients (62.5%) when using direct sequencing: Eight had the Basel mutation (c.218C>T), while two had the Cambridge II mutation (c.1246G>T). For seven of the ten patients this meant an altered clinical risk-assessment for future thromboses. Conclusions: Awareness must be drawn to the possibility of differences in DNA diagnostics in general and advances when using newer techniques in particular. One should consider re-analysis of results obtained by earlier sequencing strategies, as clinically important information can be overlooked.
    Clinical Biochemistry 06/2014; 47(13-14). DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.06.013 · 2.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Venous Thrombosis - Principles and Practice, 01/2012; , ISBN: 978-953-307-885-4