Inherited antithrombin deficiency: A review

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Haemophilia (Impact Factor: 2.6). 12/2008; 14(6):1229-39. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2008.01830.x
Source: PubMed


Antithrombin (AT) is a potent inactivator of thrombin and factor Xa and the major inhibitor of blood coagulation. Inherited AT deficiencies are uncommon, with prevalences in the general population between 1 in 500 and 1 in 5000. They are either quantitative (type I) or qualitative (type II). Type II is subdivided into the more common, but less thrombogenic, type IIb deficiency caused by a defect in the heparin-binding region of AT and the less common, but more thrombophilic, type IIa variant caused by mutations in the thrombin-binding site. A pleiotropic type IIc deficiency also exists. In the evaluation of a thrombophilic individual, a functional AT assay (AT activity) should be used and the diagnosis of AT deficiency only established after acquired causes have been ruled out and repeat AT testing on an additional sample has been performed. A subsequent antigenic AT assay result leads to differentiation between type I and type II deficiency. Further specialized tests help subclassify the type II deficiencies, but this is typically not carried out for clinical purposes, even though it might be helpful to assess thrombosis risk. AT deficiency is associated with an increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and pregnancy loss. The association with arterial thrombosis is only weak. VTE prophylaxis and treatment management will be discussed in this article and existing treatment guidelines presented. The lack of data surrounding the use of AT concentrates and the resulting ambiguity as to when to use such concentrates will be discussed.

Download full-text


Available from: Mrinal M Patnaik,
    • "The prevalence of this mutation in Europe is about 2–3% for heterozygous carriers and VTE risk is increased 2–4 fold [10]. On the other hand, deficiency of naturally existing anticoagulants like antithrombin, protein C or protein S can be caused by heritable genetic defects [11] [12]. Heritable thrombophilia is also discussed for patients with klinefelter syndrome and chronic leg ulcers. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Chronic wounds are a common problem with high requirements for treating physicians, home carers and the patient himself. Frequent recurrence, long lasting therapy duration, high material costs and negative impact on quality of life represent some of the challenges a wound carer is confronted with. The objective of this review is to discuss the diagnostic thoughts and algorithms which are essential when treating patients with chronic wounds, especially chronic leg ulcers. Therapeutic steps in wound care require clear diagnostic investigations to determine causative aetiological factors for chronic wounds and their underlying diseases. Only by knowing the aetiology of an ulcer, the appropriate therapeutic step can be initiated.
    Reviews in Vascular Medicine 05/2015; 3(1). DOI:10.1016/j.rvm.2015.05.001
  • Source
    • "The leading causes of inherited thrombophilia in Caucasians are the activated protein C resistance -in most cases due to the Factor V Leiden polymorphism -and the prothrombin G20210A gene polymorphism [3,4]. Besides these two common thrombophilic conditions (prevalence in the general population of 3-7% and 0.7-4%, respectively) [2], reductions in plasma natural anticoagulants (antithrombin [AT], protein C [PC] or protein S [PS]) have long been recognized as rare, but potent risk factors for VTE [5] [6] [7]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Natural anticoagulants deficiency (antithrombin [AT], protein C [PC], protein S [PS]) is a rare, but potent risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). We performed a meta-analysis of observational studies evaluating the impact of inherited natural anticoagulants deficiency on VTE risk. Case-control and cohort studies evaluating the association of these abnormalities with VTE were systematically searched in the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and EMBASE databases. Twenty-one studies were included in the analysis. Thirteen studies (3,452 cases and 11,562 controls) showed an increased risk of first VTE in AT deficient subjects compared to controls (OR: 16.26, 95%CI:9.90-26.70; P<0.00001). An increased risk of first VTE was also found in PC (11 studies, 2,554 cases and 9,355 controls; OR: 7.51, 95%CI:3.21-17.52; P<0.00001) and PS deficient patients (14 studies, 4,955 cases and 9,267 controls; OR: 5.37; 95%CI:2.70-10.67; P<0.00001) compared to controls. Evaluating the risk of VTE recurrence, we found a significant association with AT (4 studies, 142 cases and 1,927 controls; OR: 3.61; 95%CI:1.46-8.95; P=0.006) and with PC (2 studies, 80 cases and 546 controls; OR: 2.94; 95%CI:1.43-6.04; P=0.03), but not with PS deficiency (2 studies, 57 cases and 589 controls; OR: 2.52; 95%CI:0.89-7.16; P=0.08). Sensitivity and subgroup analyses confirmed these results. The association among natural anticoagulants deficiency and VTE was maximal for patients with unprovoked events. The VTE risk is increased in patients with natural anticoagulants deficiency, but additional studies are warranted to better assess the risk of VTE recurrence. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
    Thrombosis Research 03/2015; 135(5). DOI:10.1016/j.thromres.2015.03.010 · 2.45 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Moreover, two of the patients with a type IIb mutation also presented with normal AT activity levels using the FXa inhibition-activity assay (Table 1) suggesting that this method may be affected also by other type II mutations. Altogether, this supports previous findings indicating that there is a risk of not detecting all type II deficiencies when using FXa inhibition-based methods alone [14] [15]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives: In hereditary antithrombin (AT) deficiency it is important to determine the underlying mutation since the future risk of thromboembolism varies considerably between mutations. DNA investigations are in general thought of as flawless and irrevocable, but the diagnostic approach can be critical. We therefore investigated mutation results in the AT gene, SERPINC1, with two different approaches. Design and methods: Sixteen patients referred to the Centre for Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Odense University Hospital, with biochemical indications of AT deficiency, but with a negative denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) mutation screening (routine approach until recently) were included. As an alternative mutation analysis, direct sequencing of all exons and exon-intron boundaries without pre-selection by DHPLC was performed. Results: Out of sixteen patients with a negative DHPLC mutation screening, discordant results were found in ten patients (62.5%) when using direct sequencing: Eight had the Basel mutation (c.218C>T), while two had the Cambridge II mutation (c.1246G>T). For seven of the ten patients this meant an altered clinical risk-assessment for future thromboses. Conclusions: Awareness must be drawn to the possibility of differences in DNA diagnostics in general and advances when using newer techniques in particular. One should consider re-analysis of results obtained by earlier sequencing strategies, as clinically important information can be overlooked.
    Clinical Biochemistry 06/2014; 47(13-14). DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.06.013 · 2.28 Impact Factor
Show more