Article

Collaborative care for adolescent depression: a pilot study.

Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98115, USA.
General hospital psychiatry (Impact Factor: 2.9). 01/2009; 31(1):36-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2008.09.019
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The main objectives of this study were to explore the preliminary outcomes and assess the feasibility and acceptability of a collaborative care intervention designed to improve treatment and outcomes of depression among youth seen in primary care settings.
We conducted a pilot intervention study at three clinics in a university affiliated primary care clinic network. The intervention model was designed to support the provision of depression treatment by primary care providers using methods adapted from the IMPACT study developed for the improvement of depression among older adults. Specific components include the provision of regular case management by a nurse depression care manager (DCM), enhanced patient and parent education about depression and its treatment, encouragement of patient self-management with a choice of starting medications or therapy or both, and oversight of the DCM by a mental health specialist. Study participants were assessed regularly by the DCM for 6 months and completed written self-report assessments at baseline, 3, and 6 months after starting the intervention.
40 youth (12-18 years) with major and minor depression enrolled in the intervention. Study participants were predominantly female (90%). The baseline Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) score was 14.2 (SD=4.5). Patients were similarly divided among initiating medications (n=12), therapy (n=15), or combination therapy (n=8). Five patients withdrew prior to initiating treatment. The mean number of in person and telephone contacts with the DCM was 9 (range=5 to 17). Eighty-seven percent of youth completed the 6-month intervention. At 6 month follow-up, 74% of youth had a 50% or more reduction in depressive symptoms as measured by the PHQ-9. Parents, youth and physicians indicated high levels of satisfaction with the intervention on written surveys and in qualitative exit interviews.
The collaborative care model is feasible and highly acceptable to adolescents and parents as demonstrated both by self-report and by engagement in the intervention. It is also associated with improved depressive outcomes at similar levels to adult interventions. Future studies should evaluate these models in a randomized controlled trial.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Wayne Katon, May 22, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
68 Views
  • Source
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract We identify the rapidly changing health care system as the backdrop and impetus for significant advances in the delivery of behavioral, psychosocial and mental health care within the general health care sector. Accompanying,this significant change is the demand,that this care be evidence-based as well as cost-effective, costneutral or of relatively modest cost; while complicating this change is growing diversity in consumer demographics and culturally based
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although empirical evidence has recently validated clinical depression in children as young as age 3, few data are available to guide treatment of early childhood depression. Considering this gap in the literature, a novel dyadic psychotherapeutic model, Parent Child Interaction Therapy-Emotion Development, based on a well-known and effective manualized treatment for disruptive preschoolers, is currently being tested for use in depression. To balance safety and efficacy, dyadic developmental approaches are currently recommended as the first line of treatment for preschool depression. In the absence of data on the safety and efficacy of antidepressants in preschool depression, these agents are not recommended as a first- or second-line treatment at this time. This article provides an illustrative case example of preschool depression, outlines key considerations in differential diagnosis, and describes this novel form of treatment. It also clarifies parameters for the rare situations in which antidepressants may be tried when psychotherapeutic options fail and depression is severe and impairing.
    American Journal of Psychiatry 10/2009; 166(9):974-9. DOI:10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.08111709 · 13.56 Impact Factor