Download full-text


Available from: José D. Bermúdez, Jul 24, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The objective of this paper is to determine the optimal forecasting for the Holt–Winters exponential smoothing model using spreadsheet modeling. This forecasting procedure is especially useful for short-term forecasts for series of sales data or levels of demand for goods. The non-linear programming problem associated with this forecasting model is formulated and a spreadsheet model is used to solve the problem of optimization efficiently. Also, a spreadsheet makes it possible to work in parallel with various objective functions (measures of forecast errors) and different procedures for calculating the initial values of the components of the model. Using a scenario analysis, the set of local minima obtained may be visualized. We have solved some examples in order to illustrate this approach.
    European Journal of Operational Research 06/2001; DOI:10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00062-X · 1.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Exponential smoothing (ES) forecasting methods are widely used but are often dis-cussed without recourse to a formal statistical framework. This paper reviews and compares a variety of potential models for ES. As well as autoregressive integrated moving average and structural models, a promising class of dynamic non-linear state space models is described that allows for a changing variance. The richness of possible models helps to explain why ES methods seem to be robust in practice. A modelling approach can enhance the forecaster's ability to identify pertinent components of time series variation, and to obtain more reliable estimates of prediction error variances. The paper should be of particular interest to those engaged in forecasting appli-cations where strategies that allow for risk and uncertainty are needed.
    Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) 12/2001; 50(2):147 - 159. DOI:10.1111/1467-9884.00267
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the last few decades many methods have become available for forecasting. As always, when alternatives exist, choices need to be made so that an appropriate forecasting method can be selected and used for the specific situation being considered. This paper reports the results of a forecasting competition that provides information to facilitate such choice. Seven experts in each of the 24 methods forecasted up to 1001 series for six up to eighteen time horizons. The results of the competition are presented in this paper whose purpose is to provide empirical evidence about differences found to exist among the various extrapolative (time series) methods used in the competition.
    Journal of Forecasting 04/1982; 1(2):111 - 153. DOI:10.1002/for.3980010202 · 0.93 Impact Factor