Advances in Complex Systems (Impact Factor: 0.97). 12/2002; 05(04):433-443. DOI: 10.1142/S0219525902000614
Source: RePEc


The stability of some spatial asymmetric games is discussed. Both linear and nonlinear asymptotic stability of asymmetric hawk-dove and prisoner's dilemma are studied. Telegraph reaction diffusion equations for the asymmetric spatial games are presented. Asymmetric games of parental investment is studied in the presence of both ordinary and cross diffusions.

Download full-text


Available from: E. Ahmed,
1 Follower
16 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The concept of cross diffusion is applied to some biological systems. The conditions for persistence and Turing instability in the presence of cross diffusion are derived. Many examples including: predator-prey, epidemics (with and without delay), hawk–dove–retaliate and prisoner's dilemma games are given.
    Advances in Complex Systems 11/2011; 07(01). DOI:10.1142/S0219525904000056 · 0.97 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The condition of cooperation in social conflicts of interest has been an interesting topic. On the one hand people usually desire to make their own profit. On the other hand, they mutually cooperate. This fact has motivated many researchers. Some solutions for this question have been proposed, and particular studies indicate that the diversity in decision-making or relationships promotes cooperation. In this research, we achieve the diversity by utilizing the novel method that refers to the mechanism of correction regarding each probability that every strategy comes to the representative by decision-making of group. This mechanism works when difference between the probability of the first and others becomes quite large. If once every group adopts this corrected decision, he/she achieves mutual cooperation of high level in the sequential prisoner's dilemma game in case the number of strategies (= players) is within the definite range. We also note that this game can effectively describe the property of evolution of strategy only with a small number of players. When each group has many players, in contrast to previous research, the decision with correction also has an effect on the suppression of prevalence of defection. In addition, we also show that the decision of this model is analogous to the system of redistribution of revenue, which provides balance of strength between several teams in professional sports.
    Advances in Complex Systems 11/2011; 14(3):377-401. DOI:10.1142/S0219525911002962 · 0.97 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Previous studies discussing cooperation employ the best decision that every player knows all information regarding the payoff matrix and selects the strategy of the highest payoff. Therefore, they do not discuss cooperation based on the altruistic decision with limited information (bounded rational altruistic decision). In addition, they do not cover the case where every player can submit his/her strategy several times in a match of the game. This paper is based on Ohdaira's reconsideration of the bounded rational altruistic decision, and also employs the framework of the prisoner's dilemma game (PDG) with sequential strategy. The distinction between this study and the Ohdaira's reconsideration is that the former covers the model of multiple groups, but the latter deals with the model of only two groups. Ohdaira's reconsideration shows that the bounded rational altruistic decision facilitates much more cooperation in the PDG with sequential strategy than Ohdaira and Terano's bounded rational second-best decision does. However, the detail of cooperation of multiple groups based on the bounded rational altruistic decision has not been resolved yet. This study, therefore, shows how randomness in the network composed of multiple groups affects the increase of the average frequency of mutual cooperation (cooperation between groups) based on the bounded rational altruistic decision of multiple groups. We also discuss the results of the model in comparison with related studies which employ the best decision.
    Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical 06/2014; 47(27):275101. DOI:10.1088/1751-8113/47/27/275101 · 1.58 Impact Factor