Prevalência do refluxo na veia safena parva em varizes primárias não complicadas dos membros inferiores pelo eco-Doppler colorido

Jornal Vascular Brasileiro 01/2006; 5(1). DOI: 10.1590/S1677-54492006000100009


Objective: To determine the prevalence of small saphenous vein reflux (SSVR) in patients with uncomplicated varicose veins, using color-flow Doppler ultrasonography. Method: Over an 18-month period, a total of 1,953 patients underwent color-flow Doppler ultrasonography for evaluation of venous disease. Out of the total, 1,631 patients with primary uncomplicated varicose veins were selected for this study: 1,383 (84.79%) patients were female and 248 (15.21%) were male. Mean age was 42.9 (± 0.48) years, ranging from 13 to 85 years. Of the 1,631 patients, 1,323 underwent bilateral examination and 308 unilateral examination, for a total of 2,954 lower limbs with primary uncomplicated varicose veins studied. The number of right lower limbs studied was 1,461 and the number of left lower limbs was 1,493. All exams were carried out using the same protocol. Result: Out of the total number of 2,954 limbs, SSVR was detected 372 (12.59%) limbs. Prevalence of SSVR in males was 14.08% and in females was 12.35%. SSVR was detected in the right lower limb in 12.05% and in left lower limb in 13.13% of the cases. SSVR was significantly more common in patients older than 60 years. Conclusion: SSVR is relatively common and its presence should always be investigated in patients with primary lower limb varicose veins. Abstract

Download full-text


Available from: Graciliano José França, Apr 10, 2014
80 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study is to identify the anatomic location of venous disease in patients with venous ulceration and chronic venous insufficiency. Both limbs of 59 consecutive patients attending the Middlesex Hospital Vascular Laboratory (London, U.K.) with venous ulceration were assessed by color duplex ultrasound scanning to determine the location of venous disease. Isolated deep venous reflux was present in only 12 limbs (15%). A combination of deep and superficial venous reflux was found in 25 limbs (32%), and in 42 limbs (53%) there was only superficial venous reflux. In just over half the patients with venous ulceration, the disease is confined to the superficial venous system. This group of patients may benefit from surgical treatment. This study emphasizes the need for vascular laboratory investigation of patients with leg ulceration.
    Journal of Vascular Surgery 04/1993; 17(3):487-90. DOI:10.1067/mva.1993.37933 · 3.02 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Several techniques are currently available for the detection of venous reflux. We have attempted to determine the relative value and accuracy of available techniques to develop a logical strategy of investigation in reflux venous insufficiency. The morphologic distribution of venous incompetence (erect duplex and descending venography); the results of ambulatory venous pressure measurement, venous refilling time, the Valsalva test, and air-plethysmography (venous refilling index, VFI); and the clinical severity were described in 118 consecutive limbs. In an attempt to validate the tests, results were correlated with the clinical severity classification (class 0, n = 34; class 1, n = 42; class 2, n = 11; class 3, n = 31) and with a standardized quantification of reflux (multisegment score) as seen on standing duplex Doppler scanning with rapid deflation cuffs. Twenty-nine percent of limbs with severe venous disease (class 2/3) had pure deep insufficiency, only 6% had pure superficial disease, and the remainder had a combination. A history of previous thrombosis and the presence of posterior tibial vein incompetence were markedly common with ulcer disease (84% and 42%, respectively). The duplex Doppler multisegment score correlated strongly with clinical severity classification (r = 0.97). The venous refilling time and VFI had the highest sensitivity in identifying severe venous disease (class 2/3), and the ambulatory venous pressure had excellent specificity. For noninvasive determination of reflux, the combination of VFI and duplex scanning not only localized reflux but also separated severe clinical vein disease from mild, with high sensitivity and specificity. Air plethysmography may also provide valuable information regarding calf muscle pump and outflow obstruction.
    Journal of Vascular Surgery 04/1993; 17(3):590-5. DOI:10.1016/0741-5214(93)90160-N · 3.02 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The prevalence of reflux in the deep and superficial venous systems in the Edinburgh population and the relationship between patterns of reflux and the presence of venous disease on clinical examination were studied. A cross-sectional survey was done on men and women ranging in age from 18 to 64 years, randomly selected from 12 general practices. The presence of varicose veins and chronic venous insufficiency was noted on clinical examination, as was the duration of venous reflux by means of duplex scanning in 8 vein segments on each leg. Results were compared using cut-off points for reflux duration (RD) of 0.5 seconds or more (RD >/= 0.5) and more than 1.0 second (RD > 1.0) to define reflux. There were 1566 study participants, 867 women and 699 men. The prevalence of reflux was similar in the right and left legs. The proportion of participants with reflux was highest in the lower thigh long saphenous vein (LSV) segment (18.6% in the right leg and 17.5% in the left leg for RD >/= 0.5), followed by the above knee popliteal segments (12.3% in the right leg and 11.0% in the left leg for RD >/= 0.5), the below knee popliteal (11.3% in the right leg and 9.5% in the left leg for RD >/= 0.5), upper LSV (10.0% in the right leg and 10.8% in the left leg for RD >/= 0.5) segments, the common femoral vein segments (7.8% in the right leg and 8.0% in the left leg for RD >/= 0.5), the lower superficial femoral vein (SFV) segments (6.6% in the right leg and 6.4% in the left leg for RD >/= 0.5), and the upper SFV (5.2% in the right leg and 4.7% in the left leg for RD >/= 0.5) and short saphenous vein (SSV) (4.6% in the right leg and 5.6% in the left leg for an RD >/= 0.5) segments. In the superficial vein segments, there was little difference in the occurrence of reflux whether RD >/= 0.5 or RD > 1.0 was used; but in the different deep vein segments, the prevalence of reflux was 2 to 4 times greater for RD >/= 0.5 rather than RD > 1.0. Men had a higher prevalence of reflux in the deep vein segments than women, reaching statistical significance (P </=.01) in 4 of 5 segments for RD >/= 0.5. In general, the prevalence of reflux increased with age. Those with "venous disease" had a significantly higher prevalence of reflux in all vein segments than those with "no disease" (P </=.001). The prevalence of venous reflux in the general population was related to the presence of "venous disease," although it was also present in those without clinically apparent disease. There was a higher prevalence of reflux in the deep veins in men than the deep veins in women. Follow-up study of the population will determine the extent to which reflux is a predictor of future disease and complications.
    Journal of Vascular Surgery 11/1998; 28(5):767-76. DOI:10.1016/S0741-5214(98)70051-5 · 3.02 Impact Factor
Show more