In vivo imaging of transport and biocompatibility of single silver nanoparticles in early development of zebrafish embryos.

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia 23529, USA.
ACS Nano (Impact Factor: 12.03). 10/2007; 1(2):133-43. DOI: 10.1021/nn700048y
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Real-time study of the transport and biocompatibility of nanomaterials in early embryonic development at single-nanoparticle resolution can offer new knowledge about the delivery and effects of nanomaterials in vivo and provide new insights into molecular transport mechanisms in developing embryos. In this study, we directly characterized the transport of single silver nanoparticles into an in vivo model system (zebrafish embryos) and investigated their effects on early embryonic development at single-nanoparticle resolution in real time. We designed highly purified and stable (not aggregated and no photodecomposition) nanoparticles and developed single-nanoparticle optics and in vivo assays to enable the study. We found that single Ag nanoparticles (5-46 nm) are transported into and out of embryos through chorion pore canals (CPCs) and exhibit Brownian diffusion (not active transport), with the diffusion coefficient inside the chorionic space (3 x 10(-9) cm(2)/s) approximately 26 times lower than that in egg water (7.7 x 10(-8) cm(2)/s). In contrast, nanoparticles were trapped inside CPCs and the inner mass of the embryos, showing restricted diffusion. Individual Ag nanoparticles were observed inside embryos at each developmental stage and in normally developed, deformed, and dead zebrafish, showing that the biocompatibility and toxicity of Ag nanoparticles and types of abnormalities observed in zebrafish are highly dependent on the dose of Ag nanoparticles, with a critical concentration of 0.19 nM. Rates of passive diffusion and accumulation of nanoparticles in embryos are likely responsible for the dose-dependent abnormalities. Unlike other chemicals, single nanoparticles can be directly imaged inside developing embryos at nanometer spatial resolution, offering new opportunities to unravel the related pathways that lead to the abnormalities.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There has been extensive growth in nanoscale technology in the last few decades to such a degree that nanomaterials (NMs) have become a constituent in a wide range of commercial and domestic products. With NMs already in use in several consumer products, concerns have emerged regarding their potential adverse environmental impacts. Although research has been undertaken in order to minimise the gaps in our understanding of NMs in the environment, little is known about their bioavailability and toxicity in the aquatic environment. Nano-toxicology is defined as the study of the toxicity of nanomaterials. Nano-toxicology studies remain poorly and unevenly distributed. To date most of the research undertaken has been restricted to a narrow range of test species such as daphnids. Crabs are bio-indicators that can be used for toxicological research on NMs since they occupy a significant position in the aquatic food chain. In addition, they are often used in conventional ecotoxicological studies due to their high sensitivity to environmental stressors and are abundantly available. Because they are benthic organisms they are prone to contaminant uptake and bioaccumulation. To our knowledge the crab has never been used in nano-toxicological studies. In this context, an extensive review on published scientific literature on the ecotoxicity of silver NPs (AgNPs) on aquatic organisms was conducted. Some of the most common biomarkers used in ecotoxicological studies are described. Emphasis is placed on the use of biomarker responses in crabs as monitoring tools, as well as on its limitations. Additionally, the gaps in nano-toxicological research and recommendations for future research initiatives are addressed.
    Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering 11/2014; 49(13):1588-1601.
  • Source
    Rathore Pragya, Phanse Nandini, Patel Bhavesh
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Nanomaterials are materials that are made from particles devised at nanoscale. These nanomaterials may have many benefits in various areas like science, engineering and technology. But in the limelight of benefits the potential risks posed by these nanomaterials should not be overlooked. A substantial risk assessment procedure should be developed, especially in developing countries where the potential hazards are overlooked and the policies are made only after enormous harm has been done to the health and environment. Nanotechnology is considered as the next revolution after Information Technology. It involves the manipulation of materials and the creation of structures and systems at the scale of atoms and molecules, the nanoscale. The properties and effects of nanoscale particles and materials differ significantly from larger particles of the same chemical composition. It is too premature to say that the environmental and social costs of nanotechnology will outweigh its many benefits until the substantial harms are proved. Till date no clear guidelines are established regarding production and use of nanomaterials. The benefits of these materials are already established but the unknown risks are not accounted for. The clouds of uncertainty cause skeptics the major concern regarding the use of nanomaterials. The health and environmental risks posed by Nanomaterials cannot be assessed easily as they have diverse properties and behaviour. The kinetic (absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion) and toxic properties are influenced by the size, shape and charge of these materials and therefore even nanomaterials of the same chemical composition with different sizes or shapes may have vastly different toxicity. Hence,particle size alone is not a good criteria for differentiating between more or less hazardous materials and technologies. Until we have a much more comprehensive understanding of the biological behaviour of nanomaterials, it is impossible to predict the toxicity risks associated with any one material, and each new nanomaterial must be subject to new health and safety assessment prior to its commercial use.
    04/2012; 2(2):1-7.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A general approach is proposed that allows for quantifying the relative toxic contribution of ions released from metallic nanoparticles and of the particles themselves, as exemplified for the case of differently shaped ZnO nanoparticles exposed to zebrafish embryos. First of all, the toxicity of suspensions of ZnO nanoparticles (NP(total)): nanospheres, nanosticks, cuboidal submicron particles (SMPs), and Zn(NO3)2 to the embryos was assessed. The observed toxicity of ZnO NP(total) is assumed to be due to the combined effect of the particles present in the suspensions (NP(particle)) and of the dissolved Zn2+-ions released from the particles (NP(ion)). Different addition models were used to explicitly account for the toxicity of NP(particle). The median lethal concentration (LC50) of NP(particle) of nanospheres, nanosticks, SMPs were found to range between 7.1 and 11.9 mg Zn/L (i.e. to differ by a factor of 1.7) . Behavioral performance showed no significant differences among all types of the NP(particle). The median effect concentrations (EC50) of the particles were found to range between 1.0 - 2.2 mg Zn/L). At the LC50 of each particle suspension, the main contribution to lethality to zebrafish embryos was from the NP(particle) (52% - 72%). For hatching inhibition, the NP(particle) was responsible for 38 - 83 % of the adverse effects observed. ZnO nanosticks were more toxic than any of the other NPs with regard to the endpoints mortality and hatching inhibition. The main contribution to toxicity to zebrafish embryos was from the NP(particle) at the L(E)C50 of each particle suspension. Environ Toxicol Chem © 2014 SETAC
    Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 09/2014; · 2.62 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 20, 2014