Hydronephrosis at the time of diagnosis of bladder cancer is associated with advanced disease and is a predictor of poorer outcomes. There is, however, limited information addressing whether a similar relationship exists for upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). We investigate the prognostic impact of hydronephrosis on preoperative axial imaging on clinical outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy.
The records for 106 patients with UTUC who underwent radical nephroureterectomy at 2 medical centers were reviewed. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) images were evaluated for ipsilateral hydronephrosis by radiologists blinded to clinical outcomes. Association of hydronephrosis with pathologic features and oncologic outcomes after surgery was assessed.
Sixty-seven men and 39 women with a median age of 69 years (range, 36 to 90) were evaluated. One-third of these patients had muscle invasive disease or greater (≥T2), 44% had high grade tumors, and 3% had lymph node (LN) metastases. At a median follow-up of 47 months (range, 1 to 164), 43% of patients experienced disease recurrence, 18% developed metastasis, and 12% died of their cancer. Thirty-nine patients (37%) had hydronephrosis on preoperative axial imaging; 35% of these patients had ureteral tumors, and 27% had multifocal disease. The presence of hydronephrosis was associated with advanced pathologic stage (P = 0.03) and disease in the ureter (vs. renal pelvis) (P = 0.007). Hydronephrosis was a predictor of non-organ confined disease on final pathology (hazard ratio [HR] 3.7, P = 0.01). On preoperative multivariable analysis controlling for age, gender, tumor location, ureteroscopic biopsy grade, and urinary cytology, hydronephrosis was independently associated with cancer metastasis (HR 8.2, P = 0.02) and cancer-specific death (HR 12.1, P = 0.03).
Preoperative hydronephrosis on axial imaging is associated with features of aggressive disease and predicts advanced pathologic stage for UTUC. Hydronephrosis can be a valuable prognostic tool for preoperative planning and counseling regarding disease outcomes.
"Hoshino and colleagues also reported that the grade of hydronephrosis may be helpful in the clinical decision-making for adjuvant chemotherapy . Furthermore, Ng et al. demonstrated that hydronephrosis was associated with features of aggressive disease and predictive of advanced pathologic stage for upper-tract urothelial carcinoma . They suggest that hydronephrosis can be a valuable prognostic tool for preoperative planning and counseling regarding disease outcomes. "
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Obstructive nephropathy is the most common presentation of urothelial carcinoma. The role of the urine in the obstructed kidney namely "hydronephrotic urine" in urothelial carcinoma has not been extensively explored. This study aims to evaluate whether hydronephrotic urine in the obstructed kidney could promote urothelial carcinoma. The hydronephrotic urine was collected from the obstructed kidneys of Sprague-Dawley rats induced by different periods of unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO). By the inhibition of LY294002 and PD184352, we confirm that hydronephrotic urine promotes urothelial carcinoma cell (T24) and immortalized normal urothelial cells (E6) proliferation, migration and invasion in a dose-dependent manner through the activation of the mTORC2-AKT and ERK signaling pathways. Hydronephrotic urine also increases the expression of cyclin-D2, cyclin-B and CDK2. It also decreases the expression of p27 and p21 in both urothelial carcinoma cells and normal urothelial cells. By the protein array study, we demonstrate that many growth factors which promote tumor cell survival and metastasis are over-expressed in a time-dependent manner in the hydronephrotic urine, including beta-FGF, IFN-γ, PDGF-BB, PIGF, TGF-β, VEGF-A, VEGF-D and EGF. These results suggest that hydronephrotic urine promotes normal and malignant urothelial cells proliferation, migration and invasion, through the activation of the mTORC2-AKT and ERK signaling pathways. Further investigation using live animal models of tumor growth may be needed to clarify aspects of these statements.
PLoS ONE 09/2013; 8(9):e74300. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0074300 · 3.23 Impact Factor
"In UTUC, two previous studies reported that non-visualization of the urinary tract, delayed excretion, or hydronephrosis were associated with invasive ureteral cancer.  Interval from diagnosis. As suggested in bladder cancer, a recent study showed that longer interval from diagnosis of UTUC to RNU was associated with aggressive features, such as more advanced stage and higher tumor grade, but not with disease recurrence or cancer-specific mortality. "
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: UTUCC is a rare tumor, and most reports on prognostic factors come from small single-center series. The objective of this article was to provide an updated overview of current clinical, pathological and biological prognostic factors of UTUC.
PubMed was searched for records from 2002 to 2010 using the terms "prognostic factors", "recurrence", "survival", and "upper tract urothelial carcinoma". Among identified citations, papers were selected based on their clinical relevance.
Classical clinical factors that influence UTUC prognosis include age, presence of symptoms, hydronephrosis, and interval from diagnosis. Many biomarkers have shown promises to better appraise the natural course of UTUC although none is currently used in clinical practice. Stage, grade, lymph node metastases, lymphovascular invasion, tumor necrosis, and tumor architecture are strong pathological parameters. RNU is the standard treatment of localized UTUC. Both laparoscopic and open approaches seem to offer similar cancer control. Lymph node dissection increases staging accuracy and might confer a survival benefit.
RNU is the standard treatment for most patients with UTUC. Recent multicenter studies confirmed the prognostic value of classical prognostic parameters. Better survival prediction might be obtained with prognostic systems including clinical data and new biomarkers.
World Journal of Urology 06/2011; 29(4):495-501. DOI:10.1007/s00345-011-0710-3 · 2.67 Impact Factor
"In patients with bladder cancer, the presence of hydronephrosis at the time of diagnosis is associated with poorer outcomes [Divrik et al. 2007]. Ng and colleagues investigated the impact on UTUC and found that hydronephrosis was a predictor of nonorgan-confined disease on final pathology (hazard ratio [HR] 3.7, p < 0.01), was independently associated with cancer metastasis (HR 8.2, p ¼ 0.02) and cancer-specific death (HR 12.1, p ¼ 0.03) [Ng et al. 2011]. Similarly, Brien and colleagues described preoperative hydronephrosis , ureteroscopic biopsy grade and urinary cytology as markers for advanced UTUC [Brien et al. 2010]. "
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: In the last 4 years many studies have been published on the topic of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). This is a recent review of the available literature of the last 3 years. A systematic Medline/PubMed search on UTUC including limits for clinical trials and randomized, controlled trials was performed for English-language articles using the keywords 'upper urinary tract carcinoma', 'nephroureterectomy', 'laparoscopic', 'ureteroscopy', 'percutaneous', 'renal pelvis', 'ureter' and their combinations from January 2008 to December 2010. Additional selected reports from 2007 were included. Case reports and non-English literature were excluded. Publications were mostly retrospective, including some large, multicentre studies from the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration (UTUCC). The authors of this article are members of the UTUCC. Altogether, 92 original articles dealing with UTUC were identified and summarized. The vast majority of the available literature has a low level of evidence (level IV), although many multicentre studies tried to overcome the problem of low numbers by pooling data. It was concluded that in the last 3 years our knowledge regarding UTUC has increased dramatically, although new study concepts allowing us to increase the level of evidence are needed.
Therapeutic Advances in Urology 04/2011; 3(2):69-80. DOI:10.1177/1756287211403349
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.