Article

Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for resection of metastatic adenocarcinoma as an acceptable alternative.

David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, UCLA, Los Angeles, USA.
Surgical Endoscopy (Impact Factor: 3.43). 01/2009; 23(9):1947-54. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-0243-z
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Adenocarcinomas commonly metastasize to the lungs and can be resected using open thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). This study reviews metastatic resections in primary adenocarcinoma patients, using both thoracotomy and VATS. We aim to compare long-term prognoses to test the efficacy and viability of VATS.
A retrospective review of primary adenocarcinoma patients who underwent resection of pulmonary metastases from 1990 to 2006 was carried out. Information was obtained by chart review. Endpoints analyzed were disease-free interval (DFI), survival time, and recurrence-free survival (RFS).
In a total of 42 (16 male, 26 female; median age 58.5 years) primary adenocarcinoma patients, 21 patients underwent first pulmonary metastatic resection using VATS (7 male, 14 female; median age 57 years) and 21 using thoracotomy (9 male, 12 female; median age 59 years). Primary adenocarcinomas were mainly 27 colorectal (64%) and 11 breast (26%). Two VATS (10%) and three open patients (14%) had local recurrences of the original cancer. Median postoperative follow was 13.3 months [interquartile range (IQR) 4.5-32.8 months] for VATS and 36.9 months (IQR 19.3-48.6 months) after thoracotomy. Median DFI-1 was 22.3 months (IQR 13.5-40.6 months) for VATS patients and 35.6 months (IQR 26.7-61.3 months) for open patients. Second thoracic occurrences were noted in six VATS patients (median DFI-2 9.2 months), and in seven open patients (median DFI-2 21.5 months). Third thoracic occurrences were noted in one VATS patient (DFI-3 18.7 months) and in one thoracotomy patient (DFI-3 21.8 months). Odds ratio of recurrence showed 12.5% less chance of developing recurrence in VATS patients. Five-year RFS was 53% in VATS and 57% in thoracotomy patients.
VATS has become a viable alternative to open thoracotomy for resection of pulmonary metastases. In cases of primary adenocarcinoma, VATS showed no increase in number of thoracic recurrences, and comparable RFS. Short-term follow-up is encouraging; long-term follow-up will be needed to confirm these results.

1 Bookmark
 · 
176 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The use of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has allowed surgeons to perform complex procedures that previously required a thoracotomy. While VATS is well accepted in the management of benign thoracic disease, its role in the management of lung cancer continues to evolve. VATS is utilized in many aspects of the management of lung cancer including the evaluation of indeterminate pulmonary nodules and pleural effusions, staging of mediastinal lymph nodes, and the resection of primary and metastatic tumors. However, concerns regarding cost, training issues, and adherence to oncological principles have caused some surgeons to proceed more slowly. This review discusses the current role of thoracoscopy in the management of lung cancer.
    Surgical Oncology 12/2003; 12(3):195-200. · 2.14 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has developed very rapidly in these two decades, and has replaced conventional open thoracotomy as a standard procedure for some simple thoracic operations as well as an option or a complementary procedure for some other more complex operations. In this paper we will review its development history, the present status and the future perspectives.
    Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B 03/2006; 7(2):118-28. · 1.11 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the past 2 years, the development of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has allowed thoracoscopy to rapidly evolve from a primarily diagnostic tool to a therapeutic tool with potentially useful applications. As with laparoscopy, the initial enthusiasm for VATS must be tempered by the reality of technical inadequacies, complications, and results that have yet to withstand careful scientific scrutiny. The purpose of this study was to determine the technical feasibility of a VATS lobectomy. Forty-four patients with primary bronchogenic carcinoma were evaluated and accepted as potential candidates for VATS lobectomy. After complete preoperative staging, these patients were in clinical stage I. All patients had normal arterial blood gases and adequate pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second > 1.5 L) to tolerate a lobectomy. At the time of operation, 3 patients were found to have N2 disease and were excluded from the study. In 35 of the remaining 41 patients, a successful VATS lobectomy was accomplished through two thoracoscopy ports and a non-rib-spreading 6- to 8-cm "access" thoracotomy. There were no major intraoperative complications that necessitated conversion to an open thoracotomy. Mean operative time was 153 +/- 26 minutes. All 35 patients recovered uneventfully with a mean hospital stay of 5.7 +/- 1.6 days. A VATS lobectomy is technically feasible using our approach and is potentially safe. However, major advances in thoracoscopy imaging and instrumentation are necessary before this procedure will have the potential for widespread acceptance. Also, the advantages of VATS lobectomy over accepted surgical techniques will have to be carefully documented in randomized trials.
    The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 01/1994; 56(6):1248-52; discussion 1252-3. · 3.45 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
68 Downloads
Available from
May 22, 2014