Article

Enhancing daily functioning with exposure and acceptance strategies: An important stride in the development of psychological therapies for pediatric chronic pain

Division of Clinical Pain & Regional Anesthesia Research, Dept. of Anesthesiology & Peri-Operative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., UHN-2, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Pain (Impact Factor: 5.84). 02/2009; 141(3):189-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.12.012
Source: PubMed
Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Tonya M Palermo, Jan 02, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
73 Views
  • Source
    • "Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for pediatric chronic pain produces significant and large effects for pain reduction and small effects in improving function at post-treatment [7]. However, in clinical practice using a rehabilitative approach, the primary focus of treatment is on increasing function [15]. Clinical anecdotes suggest improvements in function may occur in the absence of changes in pain or that pain reduction may subsequently follow. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although pain and function improve at immediate post-treatment for youth receiving cognitive-behavioral therapy for chronic pain, limited data are available to understand changes that youth make during psychological treatment. We sought to characterize distinct trajectory patterns of change in pain and function in order to understand the temporal association of these changes during internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral treatment. Weekly repeated assessments of pain and function were conducted during eight weeks of treatment among 135 adolescents, ages 11 to 17 years, with chronic pain who were randomized to the cognitive-behavioral intervention (CBT) arm of an ongoing trial of internet-delivered CBT (Web-Based Management of Adolescent Pain; Web-MAP2). Using random effects growth mixture models we characterized pain and functional disability trajectories finding distinct trajectory groups indicating patterns of both linear as well as quadratic effects. Trajectories of change showed that some patients' pain and functional disability was improving, others worsened, or changed minimally. Paired t-tests compared the within-subject relative change rate in pain and function demonstrating similar change range for pain and function during the treatment period. There was no support for improvements in either pain or function to precede changes in the other domain. Findings may be useful in informing future studies of psychosocial treatments for pediatric chronic pain to consider how to target treatment strategies to distinct patient response profiles. This may lead to the development of intervention strategies that can both more effectively target children's pain and function during treatment, and lead to sustained changes following treatment.
    Pain 01/2015; 156(4). DOI:10.1097/01.j.pain.0000460355.17246.6c · 5.84 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this meta-analytic review was to quantify the effects of psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain in youth. Specifically, in this review we updated previous systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials by including new trials, and by adding disability and emotional functioning to pain as treatment outcomes. Electronic searches of the Cochrane Register of Randomised Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, PsycLIT, EMBASE, and the Social Sciences Citation Index were conducted from inception through August 2008. Methodological quality of the studies was assessed, and data extracted on the three primary outcomes of interest. Twenty-five trials including 1247 young people met inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Meta-analytic findings demonstrated a large positive effect of psychological intervention on pain reduction at immediate post-treatment and follow-up in youth with headache, abdominal pain, and fibromyalgia. Small and non-significant effects were found for improvements in disability and emotional functioning, although there were limited data on these outcomes available in the included studies. Omnibus cognitive-behavioral therapy, relaxation therapy, and biofeedback all produced significant and positive effects on pain reduction. Studies directly comparing the effects of self-administered versus therapist-administered interventions found similar effects on pain reduction. Psychological therapies result in improvement in pain relief across several different pain conditions in children. Future trials are needed that incorporate non-pain outcome domains, that focus significant therapeutic content on reductions in disability, and that include extended follow-up to better understand maintenance of treatment effects.
    Pain 11/2009; 148(3):387-97. DOI:10.1016/j.pain.2009.10.004 · 5.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) support the efficacy of psychological interventions for procedural pain management. However, methodological limitations (e.g., inadequate randomization) have affected the quality of this research, thereby weakening RCT findings. Detailed quality coding was conducted on 28 RCTs included in a systematic review of psychological interventions for pediatric procedural pain. The majority of RCTs were of poor to low quality (criteria reported in <50% of RCTs). Commonly reported criteria addressed study background, conditions, statistical analyses, and interpretation of results. Commonly nonreported criteria included treatment administration, evaluation of treatment efficacy (effect sizes, summary statistics, intention-to-treat analyses), caregiver demographics, follow-up, and participant flow. Quality was greater in more recent trials, and did not vary by journal type (psychology vs. medical). Despite poor quality ratings, quality reporting in psychological RCTs for pediatric procedural pain has improved over time. Recommendations for quality enhancement are provided.
    Journal of Pediatric Psychology 12/2009; 35(7):693-703. DOI:10.1093/jpepsy/jsp104 · 2.91 Impact Factor
Show more