The occurrence of illicit and therapeutic pharmaceuticals in wastewater effluent and surface waters in Nebraska

Department of Civil Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 203B Peter Kiewit Institute, Omaha, NE 68182-0178, USA.
Environmental Pollution (Impact Factor: 3.73). 03/2009; 157(3):786-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2008.11.025
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The occurrence and estimated concentration of twenty illicit and therapeutic pharmaceuticals and metabolites in surface waters influenced by wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) discharge and in wastewater effluents in Nebraska were determined using Polar Organic Chemical Integrative Samplers (POCIS). Samplers were installed in rivers upstream and downstream of treated WWTP discharge at four sites and in a discharge canal at a fifth location. Based on differences in estimated concentrations determined from pharmaceuticals recovered from POCIS, WWTP effluent was found to be a significant source of pharmaceutical loading to the receiving waters. Effluents from WWTPs with trickling filters or trickling filters in parallel with activated sludge resulted in the highest observed in-stream pharmaceutical concentrations. Azithromycin, caffeine, 1,7-dimethylzanthine, carbamazepine, cotinine, DEET, diphenhydramine, and sulfamethazine were detected at all locations. Methamphetamine, an illicit pharmaceutical, was detected at all but one of the sampling locations, representing only the second report of methamphetamine detected in WWTP effluent and in streams impacted by WWTP effluent.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The occurrence of 21 selected pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs) in river water was examined; meanwhile the presence and removal of these PhACs at different water treatment steps in two conventional drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) were evaluated. Monitoring results showed that of all 21 target PhACs, twelve PhACs were ubiquitously detected in water samples from the Yangtze river and its two tributaries (Jialing River and Huaxi stream), whereas alodipine was not found in any river water sample. The concentrations of PhACs detected in Huaxi stream were statistically significantly higher than those found in the Jialing River and the Yangzi River because of the direct discharges of uncontrolled domestic sewage and poultry wastewater and the abuse of PhACs in the rural areas served by the Huaxi stream. An environmental risk assessment of PhACs based on the risk quotient value approach indicated that sulfamethoxazole, ofloxacin and dehydrated erythromycin and clofibric acid had a medium risk, and the mixture of the studied PhACs showed high risk for the aquatic ecosystems. Fourteen out of 21 target PhACs were found in the raw water of the two studied DWTPs with azithromycin having the highest concentration (about 20 ng/L). Following the conventional water treatment processes, the studied PhACs were found to be removed by an average of 54 and 48% in DWTP A and DWTP B, respectively. Among the target PhACs, six and three PhACs were detected in finished water of DWTP B and DWTP A, respectively. This is the first study in southwestern China reporting the presence of PhACs in surface water and drinking water.
    CLEAN - Soil Air Water 12/2014; DOI:10.1002/clen.201400039 · 2.05 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An online SPE-LC–HRMS method was developed to monitor the consumption of 18 drugs of abuse (DOAs) including amphetamines, opioids, cocainics, cannabinoids, lysergics, and their corresponding metabolites in a well characterized college campus setting via wastewater analysis. Filtered and diluted (10 ×) sewage water samples (5 mL inj.) were automatically pre-concentrated and analyzed in 15 min using a Thermo EQuan MAX online SPE system equipped with a HyperSep™ Retain PEP (20 × 2.1 mm × 12 μm) SPE column and a Hypersil Gold™ aQ (150 × 2.1 mm × 3 μm) analytical column. A Q Exactive™ Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap HRMS was used in full scan mode (R = 140,000) for positive identification, and quantitation of target compounds. Method detection limits for all analytes ranged between 0.6 and 1.7 ng/L in sewage. A total of 14 DOAs were detected from two different locations (dorms and main college campus) within a one-year period. Most frequently detected drugs throughout the entire study were amphetamine (> 96%) and THC's metabolite 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ-9-THC (> 100%) with maximum concentrations of 5956 and 2413 ng/L respectively. Daily doses per 1000 people were determined in order to assess consumption of THC, amphetamine, heroin and cocaine, in both dorms and main campus.
    Science of The Total Environment 04/2015; 511. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.043 · 3.16 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Due to the large number of trace organic compounds (TOrCs) in water and wastewater, their degradation during UV-based advanced oxidation (UV/AOP) is best monitored using a conservative indicator compound. The present study demonstrates the in situ use of sucralose, a widely consumed artificial sweetener, as a conservative probe for UV/AOP degradation of TOrCs. The main qualities of sucralose in this regard are its high concentration in wastewater effluent and surface water (enabling its direct detection), its resistance to direct UV photolysis, and its relatively slow reaction with hydroxyl radical. Degradation of sucralose was compared to the degradation of commonly detected TOrCs, across two AOPs (i.e. UV/H2O2 and UV/NO3), in both lab-scale and pilot-scale systems. In all cases, UV/AOP degradation of sucralose was slower than the degradation of the examined TOrCs, and is expected to be slower than the degradation of the majority of other environmentally relevant TOrCs. These results demonstrate the potential of sucralose as a conservative probe, to monitor the transformation of TOrCs during UV/AOP treatment. Furthermore, degradation of sucralose was slower than the degradation of many transformation products (generated during oxidation of TOrCs), implying that sucralose is also a valuable indicator for the decay of primary transformation products.
    Journal of Hazardous Materials 09/2014; 280:104-110. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.07.009 · 4.33 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 4, 2014