Incidence of Subsequent Injury to Either Knee Within 5 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Patellar Tendon Autograft

Shelbourne Knee Center, 1815 N. Capitol Avenue, Suite 530, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine (Impact Factor: 4.7). 12/2008; 37(2):246-51. DOI: 10.1177/0363546508325665
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The risk of subsequent anterior cruciate ligament injury to either knee after surgery based on sex, age, and activity has not been extensively studied.
Women have a higher incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injury to the contralateral knee after surgery than men but do not have a difference in injuries to the reconstructed knee. Young, competitive athletes have a higher incidence of injury than older patients. The time to return to full activities does not affect injury rate.
Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 2.
The authors prospectively followed 1820 patients after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction to determine if patients suffered an injury to either knee within 5 years after surgery. Subsequent injury was evaluated based on sex, age, and activity level.
Minimum 5-year follow-up was obtained on 1415 patients (78%). Seventy-five patients (5.3%) had an injury to the contralateral knee, and 61 patients (4.3%) suffered an injury to the reconstructed knee (P = .2185). Women suffered more injuries (7.8%) to the contralateral normal knee than men (3.7%; P < .001) but not more injuries to the reconstructed knee (4.3% vs 4.1%; P = .5543). The risk of subsequent injury to either knee was 17% for patients <18 years old, 7% for patients aged 18 to 25 years, and 4% for patients older than 25 years. There was no difference in injury rate between patients who returned before and after 6 months postoperatively.
Women have a higher incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injury to the contralateral knee than men after reconstruction. The incidence of injury to either knee after reconstruction is associated with younger age and higher activity level, but returning to full activities before 6 months postoperatively does not increase the risk of subsequent injury.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Anterior cruciate ligament injury is a common and potentially catastrophic knee joint injury, afflicting a large number of males and particularly females annually. Apart from the obvious acute injury events, it also presents with significant long-term morbidities, where osteoarthritis is a frequent and debilitative outcome. With these facts in mind, a vast amount of research has been undertaken over the past fifty years geared towards characterizing the structural and mechanical behaviors of the native ACL tissue under various external load applications. While these efforts have afforded important insights, both in terms of understanding and treating ACL injuries; injury rates, their well-established sex-based disparity and long-term sequelae have endured. In reviewing the vast amount of literature conducted to date in this area, the current paper identifies important knowledge gaps that appear to contribute directly to this long-standing clinical dilemma. In particular, the following limitations remain. First, minimal data exist that accurately describe native ACL mechanics under the extreme loading rates synonymous with actual injury. Second, current ACL mechanical data are typically derived from isolated and oversimplified strain estimates that fail to adequately capture the true 3-D mechanical response of this anatomically complex structure. Third, graft tissues commonly chosen to reconstruct the ruptured ACL are mechanically flawed, being over-designed for stiffness compared to the native tissue. The net result is an increased risk of re-rupture and a modified and potentially hazardous joint contact profile. These major limitations appear to warrant explicit research attention moving forward in order to successfully maintain/restore optimal knee joint function and long-term life quality in a large number otherwise healthy individuals.
    Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 12/2014; 137(2). DOI:10.1115/1.4029278 · 1.75 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Controversy in management of athletes exists after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and reconstruction. Consensus criteria for evaluating successful outcomes following ACL injury include no reinjury or recurrent giving way, no joint effusion, quadriceps strength symmetry, restored activity level and function, and returning to preinjury sports. Using these criteria, the success rates of current management strategies after ACL injury are reviewed and recommendations are provided for the counseling of athletes after ACL injury. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Clinics in Sports Medicine 02/2015; 34(2):301-312. DOI:10.1016/j.csm.2014.12.008 · 2.58 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite the well-established role of sex on the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk, its effects on ACL surgical outcomes remain controversial. This is particularly critical when developing novel surgical techniques to treat the injury because there are limited data existing on how these procedures will respond in each sex. One such approach is bridge-enhanced ACL repair, in which primary suture repair of the ACL is augmented with a bioactive scaffold saturated with autologous blood. It has shown comparable biomechanical outcomes to ACL reconstruction in preclinical models. We asked (1) whether sex affects the biomechanical outcomes of bridge-enhanced ACL repair; and (2) if suture type (absorbable or nonabsorbable), used to repair the torn ACL, can minimize the potential sex discrepancies in outcomes after 15 weeks of healing in a large animal preclinical model. Seventeen (eight males, nine females) Yorkshire pigs (Parson's Farms, Hadley, MA, USA) underwent bilateral ACL transection and received bridge-enhanced ACL repair with an absorbable suture (n = 17) on one side and with a nonabsorbable suture (n = 17) on the other side. The leg receiving the absorbable suture was randomized within each animal. ACL structural properties and AP knee laxity for each knee were measured after 15 weeks of healing. Mixed linear models were used to compare the biomechanical outcomes between sexes and suture groups. When treated with absorbable suture, females had a lower ACL linear stiffness (females, 11 N/mm [range, 8-42]; males, 31 N/mm [range, 12-56]; difference, 20 N/mm [95% confidence interval {CI}, 4-36]; p = 0.032), ACL yield (females, 121 N [range, 56-316]; males, 224 N [range, 55-538]; difference, 103 N [95% CI, 6-200]; p = 0.078), and maximum load (females, 128 N [range, 63-332]; males, 241 N [range, 82-538]; difference, 114 N [95% CI, 15-212]; p = 0.052) than males after 15 weeks of healing. Female knees treated with absorbable suture had a lower linear stiffness (absorbable, 11 N/mm [range, 8-42]; nonabsorbable, 25 N/mm [range, 8-64]; difference, 14 [95% CI, 2-26] N; p = 0.054), ACL yield (absorbable, 121 N [range, 56-316]; nonabsorbable, 230 N [range, 149-573]; difference, 109 N [95% CI, 56-162]; p = 0.002), and maximum load (absorbable, 128 N [range, 63-332]; nonabsorbable, 235 N [range, 151-593]; difference, 107 N [95% CI, 51-163]; p = 0.002) along with greater AP knee laxity at 30° (absorbable, 9 mm [range, 5-12]; nonabsorbable, 7 mm [range, 2-13]; difference, 2 mm [95% CI, 1-4]; p = 0.034) than females treated with nonabsorbable suture. When repaired using nonabsorbable suture, the biomechanical outcomes were similar between female and male knees (p > 0.10). Females had significantly worse biomechanical outcomes than males when the repairs were performed using absorbable sutures. However, the use of nonabsorbable sutures ameliorated these differences between males and females. The current findings highlight the critical role of sex on the biomechanical outcomes of bridge-enhanced ACL repair in a relevant large animal model. Better understanding of the mechanisms responsible for these observations using preclinical models and concomitant clinical studies in human patients may allow for additional development of sex-specific surgical and rehabilitative strategies with potentially improved outcomes in women.
    Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 03/2015; DOI:10.1007/s11999-015-4226-9 · 2.88 Impact Factor


Available from

Similar Publications