Translation of Chapter 3 of "Myths and Genes" (Moscow: URSS Publishers, 2011)

ABSTRACT Here we expose our understanding of how and when folklore motifs of Old World origin probably penetrated into the New World. African – Southeast Asian, Australian, Melanesian – South American parallels (Shed Skins, Rainbow Serpent, etc.) can be interpreted as the relics of the early out-of-Africa migration to the East (Australia reached 40,000 b.p.) and possibly at the same time as a particular early "stage" in development of mythology. Almost up to the end of Upper Paleolithic (about 12,000 bp, not calibrated), the Asian Pacific Belt was occupied by the people with protomorphic physical traits related to Australian aborigens and to Papuans as well as to the Pleistocene people which skulls have been found in Brazil, Colombia, Florida, possibly Patagonia. The relics of these people’s mythology survived in Australia – Melanesia, in Eastern South America and to a lesser degree in Tierra del Fuego. In North America, some motifs (at least the Loon-woman myth of the NE California) find spectacular parallels in South America and can be interpreted as isolated survivals of the same complex. The typically Melanesian mythologies are found across the New Guinea and Bismark Archipelago while Fiji largely reminds Polynesia. Australian mythology also demonstrates the New World parallels which look “archaic”, but it lacks others, known both in South America and in New Guinea.

Download full-text


Available from: A. Korotayev, Sep 28, 2015
49 Reads
  • Ethnohistory 01/2005; DOI:10.1215/00141801-52-1-207 · 0.27 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Nonmetric and metric traits were studied in cranial series representing prehistoric and modern populations of America and Siberia. Frequencies of the infraorbital pattern type II (longitudinal infraorbital suture overlaid by the zygomatic bone) are universally lower in Amerindians than in Siberians. The os japonicum posterior trace, too, is much less frequent in America than in Siberia. The only two Siberian groups with an almost Amerindian combination are late third to early second millennium BC populations from Okunev and Sopka, southern Siberia. The multivariate analysis of five nonmetric facial traits and ten facial measurements in 15 cranial series reveals two independent tendencies. One of them shows a contrast between prehistoric Siberian Caucasoids and modern Siberian Mongoloids; the second one sets Amerindians apart from others. Prehistoric people who lived west of Lake Baikal and modern Uralic speakers are intermediate between Siberian Caucasoids and Siberian Mongoloids; Eskimos, Aleuts, and Chukchi are intermediate between Siberian Mongoloids and Amerindians; and Okunev and Sopka are intermediate between Siberian Caucasoids and Amerindians. Our results suggest that people of Okunev and Sopka are collateral relatives of Amerindians with some Caucasoid admixture.
    American Journal of Physical Anthropology 02/1999; 108(2):193-204. DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199902)108:2<193::AID-AJPA5>3.0.CO;2-V · 2.38 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Large-scale geographic variation in kinship systems may have deep roots. A number of authors now argue for an "emerging synthesis," with genetic, linguistic, and archeological findings coming together to paint a consistent picture of large-scale population spreads in prehistory. This article explores a social structural dimension of this synthesis: Major culture areas based on variation in kinship systems correspond closely—yet not perfectly—to genetic and linguistic clusters identified by other researchers. Thus it may be possible to reconstruct: (1) a set of "primary" culture areas corresponding to major population blocs and associated with ancient demic expansions and parallel transmission of genes and culture, and (2) a smaller set of overlying "secondary" culture areas of more recent origin that do not map onto genetic subdivisions and result from changes in subsistence or political economy independent of large-scale demic expansions. I also review latitudinal variation in kinship systems. [Keywords: culture areas, demic expansions, kinship (prehistory), protolanguages]
    American Anthropologist 01/2008; 105(3):501 - 514. DOI:10.1525/aa.2003.105.3.501 · 1.49 Impact Factor
Show more