Article

The challenges of pain management in primary care: A pan-European survey

Community Pain Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Journal of Pain Research 05/2013; 6:393-401. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S41883
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The OPENMinds Primary Care group is a group of European primary care physicians (PCPs) with an interest in pain management, formed to improve the understanding and management of chronic pain in primary care.
A survey was conducted to assess the challenges of chronic nonmalignant pain (CNMP) management in primary care in Europe, focusing particularly on pain assessment, opioid therapy, and educational needs.
A questionnaire was developed for online use by PCPs in 13 European countries (Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, and the UK).
A total of 1309 PCPs completed the questionnaire, approximately 100 from each country. Most PCPs (84%) perceived CNMP to be one of the most challenging conditions to treat, yet a low priority within healthcare systems. Only 48% of PCPs used pain assessment tools, and 81% considered chronic pain and its impact on quality of life to be underassessed in primary care. PCPs were less confident about prescribing strong opioids for CNMP than for use in cancer pain. Most PCPs (84%) considered their initial training on CNMP was not comprehensive, with 89% recognizing a need for more education on the topic.
These findings reveal that PCPs in Europe find CNMP a challenge to treat. Areas to address with training include underuse of pain assessment tools and lack of confidence in use of opioid therapy. Guidelines on CNMP management in primary care would be welcomed. The insights gained should provide the basis for future initiatives to support primary care management of chronic pain.

0 Followers
 · 
61 Views
  • Source
    European geriatric medicine 09/2013; 4:S156. DOI:10.1016/j.eurger.2013.07.519 · 0.55 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article describes the rationale for the creation of pain medicine as a subspecialty in Canada and outlines a brief history of its development. For pain medicine to be designated a Royal College subspecialty, it had to meet three requirements: offer sufficient scientific breadth and depth, prove a clearly identifiable unique field of practice, and show a societal need. The application process for subspecialty status was initiated in 2007, and it is anticipated that the first trainees in pain medicine will start their training in July 2014. This article outlines the variety of Royal College subspecialty entry routes as well as the proposed training objectives, curriculum, assessment of competency, practice-eligibility route to certification, and accreditation of training programs across Canada. With the inception of this subspecialty, the treatment of acute pain, cancer pain, and chronic non-cancer pain will be further integrated within the Canadian healthcare system.
    Canadian Anaesthetists? Society Journal 12/2013; 61(2). DOI:10.1007/s12630-013-0068-7 · 2.50 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Chronic pain is common in Europe and elsewhere and its under treatment confers a substantial burden on individuals, employers, healthcare systems and society in general. Indeed, the personal and socioeconomic impact of chronic pain is as great as, or greater, than that of other established healthcare priorities. In light of review of recently published data confirming its clinical and socioeconomic impact, this paper argues that chronic pain should be ranked alongside other conditions of established priority in Europe. We outline strategies to help overcome barriers to effective pain care resulting in particular from deficiencies in education and access to interdisciplinary pain management services, We also address the confusion that exists between proper clinical and scientific uses of opioid medications and their potential for misuse and diversion, as reflected in international variations in the access to, and availability of, these agents. As the economic costs are driven in part by the costs of lost productivity, absenteeism and early retirement, pain management should aim to fully rehabilitate patients, rather than merely to relieve pain. Accredited education of physicians and allied health professionals regarding state-of-the-art pain management is crucial. Some progress has been made in this area, but further provision and incentivization is required. We support a tiered approach to pain management, whereby patients with pain uncontrolled by non-specialists are able to consult a physician with a pain competency or a specialist in pain medicine, who in turn can recruit the services of other professionals on a case-by-case basis. A fully integrated interdisciplinary pain service should ideally be available to patients with refractory pain. Governments and healthcare systems should ensure that their policies on controlled medications are balanced, safeguarding public health without undue restrictions that compromise patient care, and that physician education programmes support these aims. Strategic prioritization and co-ordinated actions are required nationally and internationally to address the unacceptable and unnecessary burden of uncontrolled chronic pain that plagues European communities and economies. An appreciation of the 'return on investment' in pain management services will require policymakers to adopt a long-term, cross-budgetary approach.
    BMC Public Health 12/2013; 13(1):1229. DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-13-1229 · 2.32 Impact Factor
Show more

Preview

Download
3 Downloads
Available from