Sieve analysis in HIV-1 vaccine efficacy trials

aStatistical Center for HIV/AIDS Research and Prevention, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington bU.S. Military HIV Research Program, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring cHenry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Current opinion in HIV and AIDS (Impact Factor: 4.68). 05/2013; 8(5). DOI: 10.1097/COH.0b013e328362db2b
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Purpose of review:
The genetic characterization of HIV-1 breakthrough infections in vaccine and placebo recipients offers new ways to assess vaccine efficacy trials. Statistical and sequence analysis methods provide opportunities to mine the mechanisms behind the effect of an HIV vaccine.

Recent findings:
The release of results from two HIV-1 vaccine efficacy trials, Step/HVTN-502 (HIV Vaccine Trials Network-502) and RV144, led to numerous studies in the last 5 years, including efforts to sequence HIV-1 breakthrough infections and compare viral characteristics between the vaccine and placebo groups. Novel genetic and statistical analysis methods uncovered features that distinguished founder viruses isolated from vaccinees from those isolated from placebo recipients, and identified HIV-1 genetic targets of vaccine-induced immune responses.

Studies of HIV-1 breakthrough infections in vaccine efficacy trials can provide an independent confirmation to correlates of risk studies, as they take advantage of vaccine/placebo comparisons, whereas correlates of risk analyses are limited to vaccine recipients. Through the identification of viral determinants impacted by vaccine-mediated host immune responses, sieve analyses can shed light on potential mechanisms of vaccine protection.

Download full-text


Available from: Paul Edlefsen, Feb 09, 2015
1 Follower
18 Reads
  • Source
    • "In addition to evaluating vaccine efficacy as a function of subject-specific covariates, it is often of interest to evaluate the extent to which a vaccine's efficacy differs by type of infection. In a series of papers on what has variously been called “mark-specific intervention efficacy” or “sieve effects,” Gilbert et al. defined sufficient conditions under which estimates are unbiased for quantities relevant to the identification of these effects [5–7]. Here we argue that one of those conditions can be represented as a requirement of “proportional exposure pseudohazards” and that this condition is required not only for the failure-type-only methods (such as multinomial logistic regression (MLR)) but also for the time-to-event methods (including competing risks Cox models, even when relaxing the assumption of proportional baseline risks as in [8]). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: “Leaky” vaccines are those for which vaccine-induced protection reduces infection rates on a per-exposure basis, as opposed to “all-or-none” vaccines, which reduce infection rates to zero for some fraction of subjects, independent of the number of exposures. Leaky vaccines therefore protect subjects with fewer exposures at a higher effective rate than subjects with more exposures. This simple observation has serious implications for analysis methodologies that rely on the assumption that the vaccine effect is homogeneous across subjects. We argue and show through examples that this heterogeneous vaccine effect leads to a violation of the proportional hazards assumption, to incomparability of infected cases across treatment groups, and to nonindependence of the distributions of the competing failure processes in a competing risks setting. We discuss implications for vaccine efficacy estimation, correlates of protection analysis, and mark-specific efficacy analysis (also known as sieve analysis).
    Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine 05/2014; 2014:813789. DOI:10.1155/2014/813789 · 0.77 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The method may also be used, as SMM was [16], for analysis of correlations between specific breakthrough viral epitopes and vaccine efficacy in vaccine clinical trials (i.e. sieve analysis) [31]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The extreme diversity of HIV-1 strains presents a formidable challenge for HIV-1 vaccine design. Although antibodies (Abs) can neutralize HIV-1 and potentially protect against infection, antibodies that target the immunogenic viral surface protein gp120 have widely variable and poorly predictable cross-strain reactivity. Here, we developed a novel computational approach, the Method of Dynamic Epitopes, for identification of neutralization epitopes targeted by anti-HIV-1 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Our data demonstrate that this approach, based purely on calculated energetics and 3D structural information, accurately predicts the presence of neutralization epitopes targeted by V3-specific mAbs 2219 and 447-52D in any HIV-1 strain. The method was used to calculate the range of conservation of these specific epitopes across all circulating HIV-1 viruses. Accurately identifying an Ab-targeted neutralization epitope in a virus by computational means enables easy prediction of the breadth of reactivity of specific mAbs across the diversity of thousands of different circulating HIV-1 variants and facilitates rational design and selection of immunogens mimicking specific mAb-targeted epitopes in a multivalent HIV-1 vaccine. The defined epitopes can also be used for the purpose of epitope-specific analyses of breakthrough sequences recorded in vaccine clinical trials. Thus, our study is a prototype for a valuable tool for rational HIV-1 vaccine design.
    PLoS ONE 02/2014; 9(2):e89987. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0089987 · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • Current opinion in HIV and AIDS 09/2013; 8(5):367-8. DOI:10.1097/01.COH.0000432529.38768.1f · 4.68 Impact Factor
Show more