Article

A Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS)-Responsive Polymer for Safe, Efficient, and Targeted Gene Delivery in Cancer Cells.

The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Chemistry & Biochemistry and School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332 (USA)
Angewandte Chemie International Edition (Impact Factor: 11.34). 05/2013; DOI: 10.1002/anie.201209633
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Stimuli-responsive release: The high levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in prostate cancer cells can be exploited to trigger cancer-targeted gene delivery. A ROS-responsive thioketal-based cationic polymer was synthesized and functionalization with a cancer-targeting peptide led to selective and enhanced gene transfection in prostate cancer cells.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
149 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Synergistic release of platinum anticancer drugs and O2 can be achieved in an H2O2-responsive nanocarrier incorporated with catalase. Such a system combines the advantages of chemotherapy and oxygen therapy and demonstrated improved therapeutic efficacy against cisplatin resistant cell lines which often appear to be in hypoxia.
    Chemical Communications 07/2014; · 6.38 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Reactive oxygen species (ROS) play key roles in many physiological processes, such as cell signaling and host innate immunity. However, when they are overproduced, ROS may damage biomolecules in vivo and cause diseases such as cardiovascular or neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, and so forth. Oxidative stress is usually implicated in various inflammatory tissues, representing an important target for the development of various therapeutic strategies. Therefore, various probes for the in vitro detection of ROS or the in vivo diagnosis of the oxidative stress-relevant diseases have been developed. Oxidation-responsive polymers have also attracted great interest due to their potential applications in biomedical fields. In this feature article, we summarize six types of oxidation-responsive polymers based on different oxidation-responsive motifs. Poly(propylene sulfide)s, selenium-based polymers, aryl oxalate- and phenylboronic ester-containing polymers are discussed in detail, while poly(thioketal)s and proline-containing polymeric scaffolds are briefly introduced.
    J. Mater. Chem. B. 05/2014; 2(22).
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We report the synthesis of a new type of amphiphilic poly(amino ester)s which can be completely degraded in aqueous media via H2O2 oxidation. The polymers were prepared by the controlled Michael-type addition polymerization of a phenylboronic pinacol ester-containing diacrylate and N-aminoethylpiperazine, followed by postmodification with mPEG5K-succinimide ester. Upon oxidation, the side chain phenylboronic esters will be transformed into phenol groups which can trigger the sequential self-immolative process to degrade the polymer main chain. Meanwhile, the amino groups on the polymer main chain are capable of trapping the highly active quinone methides generated in situ during the oxidative degradation of the polymers. Based on the detailed oxidation kinetics and products of several model compounds, the H2O2-triggered degradation of nanoparticles of these copolymers was investigated by NMR spectroscopy, GPC, and Nile red fluorescence probe. The results demonstrate that the poly(amino ester) backbones were completely degraded by H2O2, resulting in the dissociation of nanoparticles. Oxidative degradation rates of the nanoparticles could be accelerated by increasing the concentration of H2O2, the PEGylation degree, or the pH of the buffer. Interestingly, the in situ formed quinone methides could be captured by secondary amines due to their higher nucleophilicity than H2O. Of potential importance, these amphiphilic oxidation-responsive copolymers are sensitive to stimulation of 200 μM H2O2; therefore, they may find application in the field of intelligent drug/gene delivery systems.
    Macromolecules 10/2013; 46(21):8416–8425. · 5.93 Impact Factor