Enzymatic biomarkers as tools to assess environmental quality: A study of exposure of the honeybee Apis mellifera to insecticides

Universidade Federal de Lavras, Departamento de Entomologia, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (Impact Factor: 3.23). 09/2013; 32(9). DOI: 10.1002/etc.2288
Source: PubMed


This work was intended to evaluate the responses of enzymes in the honey bee Apis mellifera upon exposure to deltamethrin, fipronil and spinosad and their use as biomarkers. After LD50 determination, honey bees were exposed at doses of 5.07 and 2.53 ng/bee for deltamethrin, 0.58 and 0.29 ng/bee for fipronil and 4.71 and 2.36 ng/bee for spinosad (equivalent to LD50 /10 and LD50 /20, respectively). The responses of acetylcholinesterase (AChE), carboxylesterases (CaEs1-3), glutathione-S-transferase (GST), catalase (CAT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were assessed. The results showed that deltamethrin, fipronil and spinosad modulated these biomarkers differentially. For the enzyme involved in the defense against oxidative stress, fipronil and spinosad induced CAT activity. For the remaining enzymes, three response profiles were identified: (i) Exposure to deltamethrin induced slight effects and modulated only CaE-1 and CaE-2 with opposite effects. (ii) Spinosad exhibited an induction profile for most of the biomarkers except AChE. (iii) Fipronil did not modulate AChE, CaE-2 or GST, increased CAT and CaE-1, and decreased ALP. Thus, this set of honey bee biomarkers appears to be a promising tool to evaluate environmental and honey bee health, and it could generate fingerprints to characterize exposures to pesticides. Environ Toxicol Chem © 2013 SETAC.

Download full-text


Available from: Stephan Malfitano Carvalho, Nov 12, 2014
  • Source
    • "Sublethal effects may be characterised by physiological or behavioural alterations in surviving individuals. These responses can indicate that the functional integrity of these individuals has been affected and can contribute to a failure to perform habitual tasks (Carvalho et al., 2013). For example, studies using sublethal doses have demonstrated the toxic effects that insecticides can have on the morphology and behaviour of adult honey bees (El Hassani et al., 2007; Henry et al., 2012; Roat et al., 2013; Rossi et al., 2013a). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Several investigations have revealed the toxic effects that neonicotinoids can have on Apis mellifera, while few studies have evaluated the impact of these insecticides can have on the larval stage of the honeybee. From the lethal concentration (LC50) of thiamethoxam for the larvae of the Africanized honeybee, we evaluated the sublethal effects of this insecticide on morphology of the brain. After determine the LC50 (14.34ng/μL of diet) of thiamethoxam, larvae were exposed to a sublethal concentration of thiamethoxam equivalent to 1.43ng/μL by acute and subchronic exposure. Morphological and immunocytochemistry analysis of the brains of the exposed bees, showed condensed cells and early cell death in the optic lobes. Additional dose-related effects were observed on larval development. Our results show that the sublethal concentrations of thiamethoxam tested are toxic to Africanized honeybees larvae and can modulate the development and consequently could affect the maintenance and survival of the colony. These results represent the first assessment of the effects of thiamethoxam in Africanized honeybee larvae and should contribute to studies on honey bee colony decline. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Chemosphere 09/2015; 135:370-378. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.04.090 · 3.34 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "It can metabolize insecticides by facilitating their reductive dehydrochlorination or by conjugation reactions with reduced glutathione, to produce water-soluble metabolites that are more easily excreted (Papadopoulos et al., 2004; Enayati et al., 2005). GST activity in bees was already used as an enzymatic biomarker to assess environmental quality (Carvalho et al., 2013; Badiou-Beneteau et al., 2013). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The honey bee is among most important pollinators threatened by environmental pollution, pest control and potentially, by products of nanotechnologies. The aim of the current study was an analysis of the neurotoxic potential of ingested zinc oxide nanomaterials (ZnO NMs) or zinc ions (Zn(2+)) on honey bees. We analysed a variety of biomarkers, including metabolic impairment, feeding rate, and survival, as well as the activities of a stress-related enzyme glutathione S-transferase, and the neurotoxicity biomarker acetylcholinesterase. Acetylcholinesterase activity was found to be elevated in bees exposed to either of the tested substances. In addition, we observed increased feeding rate in the group treated with Zn(2+) but not with ZnO NMs or control group. The observed effects we relate primarily to Zn(2+) ions. Here we provide evidence that zinc ions either originating from Zn salt or Zn-based NPs have a neurotoxic potential and thus might contribute to colony survival.
    Chemosphere 10/2014; 120C:547-554. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.07.054 · 3.34 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ecological profiling of a contaminated system is the first and foremost requirement for any kind of in situ restoration activities. Therefore, in the present study, we sought to validate simple, adequate and consistent inventorying and monitoring methods for the ecological characterization of a hexachlorocylcohexane (HCH) isomers contaminated soil site in Lucknow, North India. The abundance and diversity of plant species, microbial biomass, total organic carbon, soil dehydrogenase activity, pesticide concentration in soil and plant species as well as the occurrence of ecologically sensitive species such as earthworms, honey bees and butterflies in contaminated and non-contaminated soil sites were studied. FTIR analysis was done for assessing the variation of functional groups present in soil. Furthermore, the germination assays of selected seeds were conducted in both HCH-contaminated and non-contaminated soils. Interestingly, there was a significant difference (p ≤ 0.01) observed for the studied variables in HCH-contaminated site in comparison to the non-contaminated soil site and they were negatively correlated with the level of HCH contamination. Twenty five plant species were reported from the control site; whereas in the case of HCH-contaminated site, it was reduced to seven species. The presence of α-, β-, γ- and δ-HCH isomers in the soil samples of contaminated sites were varied from 5.18–12.45, 30.15–68.77, 6.93–16.55 and 0.75–7.54 mg kg−1, respectively, whereas the concentrations of ∑HCH in plant samples were varied from 2.78 to 12.47 mg kg−1. The germination percentages of all the test plants were significantly low in contaminated soil. Most interestingly, honeybees, earthworms and butterflies were not spotted in the contaminated sites. The study indicates that proposed way of ecological characterization is appropriate for (i) knowing the extent and level of HCH isomers contamination (ii) knowing the adaptive capacity of the contaminated soil system and (iii) for adopting suitable methodical frame works for the in situ restoration of contaminated soil sites.
    Ecological Engineering 08/2014; 71:318-325. DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.07.059 · 2.58 Impact Factor
Show more