Article

Serum microRNA expression as an early marker for breast cancer risk in prospectively collected samples from the Sister Study cohort

Breast cancer research: BCR (Impact Factor: 5.88). 05/2013; 15(3):R42. DOI: 10.1186/bcr3428
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Introduction
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, non-coding, single-stranded RNAs between 18-22 nucleotides long that regulate gene expression. Expression of miRNAs is altered in tumor compared to normal tissue; there is some evidence that these changes may be reflected in the serum of cancer cases compared to healthy individuals. This has yet to be examined in a prospective study where samples are collected before diagnosis.

Methods
We used Affymetrix arrays to examine serum miRNA expression profiles in 410 participants in the Sister Study, a prospective cohort study of 50,884 women. All women in the cohort had never been diagnosed with breast cancer at the time of enrollment. We compared global miRNA expression patterns in 205 women who subsequently developed breast cancer and 205 women who remained breast cancer-free. In addition within the case group we examined the association of miRNA expression in serum with different tumor characteristics, including hormone status (ER, PR, and HER-2) and lymph node status.

Results
Overall, 414 of 1,105 of the human miRNAs on the chip were expressed above background levels in 50 or more women. When the average expression among controls was compared to cases using conditional logistic regression, 21 miRNAs were found to be differentially expressed (P≤.05). Using qRT-PCR on a small, independent sample of 5 cases and 5 controls we verified overexpression of the 3 highest expressing miRNAs among cases, miR-18a, miR-181a, and miR-222; the differences were not statistically significant in this small set. The 21 differentially expressed miRNAs are known to target at least 82 genes; using the gene list for pathway analysis we found enrichment of genes involved in cancer-related processes. In a separate case-case analyses restricted to the 21 miRNAs, we found 7 miRNAs with differential expression for women whose breast tumors differed by HER-2 expression, and 10 miRNAs with differential expression by nodal status.

Conclusions
miRNA levels in serum show a number of small differences between women who later develop cancer versus those who remain cancer-free.

Full-text

Available from: Lisa A. DeRoo, Jun 14, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
87 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) have been reported as biomarkers for disease diagnosis. RT-qPCR is most commonly used to detect miRNAs; however, no consensus on the most appropriate method for data normalization exists. Via a standardized selection method, we aimed to determine separate miRNA normalization panels for RT-qPCR measurements on whole blood, platelets, and serum. Candidate miRNAs were selected from studies describing circulating miRNA microarray data in the Gene Expression Omnibus or ArrayExpress. miRNA expression data of healthy controls were retrieved from each study. For each sample type, we selected those miRNAs that were least variable and sufficiently highly expressed in multiple microarray experiments, performed on at least 2 different platforms. Stability of the candidate miRNAs was assessed using NormFinder and geNorm algorithms in a RT-qPCR cohort of 10 patients with coronary artery disease and 10 healthy controls. We selected miRNA normalization panels for RT-qPCR measurements on whole blood, platelets, and serum. As a validation, we assessed the precision of all 3 panels in 3 independent RT-qPCR cohorts and compared this with normalization for miR-16 or RNU6B. The proposed normalization panels for whole blood, platelets, and serum show better precision than normalization for miR-16 or RNU6B.-Kok, M. G. M., Halliani, A., Moerland, P. D., Meijers, J. C. M., Creemers, E. E., Pinto-Sietsma, S.-J. Normalization panels for the reliable quantification of circulating microRNAs by RT-qPCR. © FASEB.
    The FASEB Journal 05/2015; DOI:10.1096/fj.15-271312 · 5.48 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Diagnosing and screening for tumors through noninvasive means represent an important paradigm shift in precision medicine. In contrast to tissue biopsy, detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor nucleic acids provides a minimally invasive method for predictive and prognostic marker detection. This allows early and serial assessment of metastatic disease, including follow-up during remission, characterization of treatment effects, and clonal evolution. Isolation and characterization of CTCs and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are likely to improve cancer diagnosis, treatment, and minimal residual disease monitoring. However, more trials are required to validate the clinical utility of precise molecular markers for a variety of tumor types. This review focuses on the clinical utility of CTCs and ctDNA testing in patients with solid tumors, including somatic and epigenetic alterations that can be detected. A comparison of methods used to isolate and detect CTCs and some of the intricacies of the characterization of the ctDNA are also provided. Copyright © 2015 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    The Journal of molecular diagnostics: JMD 04/2015; 17(3). DOI:10.1016/j.jmoldx.2015.02.001 · 3.96 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Breast cancer is a complex and heterogeneous disease. Signaling by estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and/or human EGF-like receptor 2 (HER2) is a main driver in the development and progression of a large majority of breast tumors. Molecular characterization of primary tumors has identified major subtypes that correlate with ER/PR/HER2 status, and also subgroup divisions that indicate other molecular and cellular features of the tumors. While some of these research findings have been incorporated into clinical practice, several challenges remain to improve breast cancer management and patient survival, for which the integration of novel biomarkers into current practice should be beneficial. microRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of short non-coding regulatory RNAs with an etiological contribution to breast carcinogenesis. miRNA-based diagnostic and therapeutic applications are rapidly emerging as novel potential approaches to manage and treat breast cancer. Rapid technological development enables specific and sensitive detection of individual miRNAs or the entire miRNome in tissues, blood, and other biological specimens from breast cancer patients. This review focuses on recent miRNA research and its potential to address unmet clinical needs and challenges. The four sections presented discuss miRNA findings in the context of the following clinical challenges: biomarkers for early detection; prognostic and predictive biomarkers for treatment decisions using targeted therapies against ER and HER2; diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for subgrouping of triple-negative breast cancer, for which there are currently no targeted therapies; and biomarkers for monitoring and characterization of metastatic breast cancer. The review concludes with a critical analysis of the current state of miRNA breast cancer research and the need for further studies using large patient cohorts under well-controlled conditions before considering the clinical implementation of miRNA biomarkers.
    Breast Cancer: Targets and Therapy 02/2015; 7:59-79. DOI:10.2147/BCTT.S43799