Article

Psychodynamic Therapy and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Social Anxiety Disorder: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
American Journal of Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 13.56). 05/2013; 170(7). DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12081125
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE Various approaches to cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) have been shown to be effective for social anxiety disorder. For psychodynamic therapy, evidence for efficacy in this disorder is scant. The authors tested the efficacy of psychodynamic therapy and CBT in social anxiety disorder in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. METHOD In an outpatient setting, 495 patients with social anxiety disorder were randomly assigned to manual-guided CBT (N=209), manual-guided psychodynamic therapy (N=207), or a waiting list condition (N=79). Assessments were made at baseline and at end of treatment. Primary outcome measures were rates of remission and response, based on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale applied by raters blind to group assignment. Several secondary measures were assessed as well. RESULTS Remission rates in the CBT, psychodynamic therapy, and waiting list groups were 36%, 26%, and 9%, respectively. Response rates were 60%, 52%, and 15%, respectively. CBT and psychodynamic therapy were significantly superior to waiting list for both remission and response. CBT was significantly superior to psychodynamic therapy for remission but not for response. Between-group effect sizes for remission and response were small. Secondary outcome measures showed significant differences in favor of CBT for measures of social phobia and interpersonal problems, but not for depression. CONCLUSIONS CBT and psychodynamic therapy were both efficacious in treating social anxiety disorder, but there were significant differences in favor of CBT. For CBT, the response rate was comparable to rates reported in Swedish and German studies in recent years. For psychodynamic therapy, the response rate was comparable to rates reported for pharmacotherapy and cognitive-behavioral group therapy.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Viktoria Ritter, Mar 28, 2014
9 Followers
 · 
337 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Only few randomized trials comparing sustained effects of short- and long-term psychotherapies in personality functioning are available. In this study we compared the effects of two short-term therapies and long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy on patients’ personality functioning during a 5-year follow-up. Methods: Altogether 326 patients of the Helsinki Psychotherapy Study, with anxiety or mood disorder, were randomly assigned to either short-term psychotherapy of about six months (solution-focused therapy (SFT, n=97) or short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (SPP, n=101)), or to long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (LPP, n=128), lasting on average three years. Outcomes in personality functioning (i.e., self-concept, defense style, interpersonal problems, and level of personality organization) were assessed five to seven times using, respectively, questionnaires (SASB, DSQ, IIP) and interview (LPO) during the 5-year follow-up from randomization. Results: Personality functioning improved in all therapy groups. Both short-term therapies fared better than LPP during the first year of follow-up, by faster improvement in self-concept and decrease in immature defense style. SFT also showed more early reduction of interpersonal problems. However, LPP thereafter showed larger and more sustained benefits than SFT and SPP, through greater changes in selfconcept. Additionally, LPP outperformed SFT at the end of the follow-up in IIP and LPO, after adjustment for auxiliary treatment. No differences were noted between the short-term therapies at any measurement point. Limitations: Auxiliary treatment was used relatively widely which limits generalization to exclusive use of short- or long-term therapy. Conclusions: LPP seems to be somewhat more effective than short-term therapies in facilitating long-term changes in personality functioning.
    Journal of Affective Disorders 03/2015; 173:31-38. DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2014.10.039 · 3.71 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Este artigo foi submetido no SGP (Sistema de Gestão de Publicações) da RBTC em 28 de maio de 2013. cod. 190. Artigo aceito em 05 de outubro de 2013. Resumem La ansiedad social se constituye como el resultado emocional de complejas respuestas biopsicosociales de importantes componentes evolutivos, biológicos, afectivos y cognitivos, enfocados hacia amenazas de posible crítica, evaluación negativa de las demás personas y falta de control, lo que conlleva a un deterioro personal y social clínicamente significativo. Los modelos explicativos desarrollados al respecto, han sido extensos cuerpos de investigación, muchos basados en procesos psicológicos subyacentes (atencionales, motivacionales, perceptuales), que ha llevado a intervenciones válidas y empíricamente demostradas, como lo por ejemplo la Terapia Cognitiva de A. T. Beck y colaboradores (Clark & Beck, 2010). El presente trabajo de revisión presenta un panorama del modelo cognitivo de la fobia social desde el procesamiento de información, que involucra desde del modelo teórico, la evaluación y el plan de psicoterapia sugerido. Se cierra con un apartado de evidencia investigativa en torno al modelo descrito y los alcances reconocidos por la comunidad científica de la terapia cognitiva frente a otros modelos de psicoterapia, en cuanto a comparaciones con grupos control, metodologías de investigación y limitaciones por superar a manera de conclusión final. AbstRAct Social anxiety has been defined as the result of complex bio-psycho-social responses with evolutive, biological, affective and cognitive components. These responses are evidenced when the individual faces threat of criticism and negative evaluation by others as well as control loss, leading to social and personal clinically significant impairment. There are abundant social phobia explanatory models, from which many are based on underlying psychological processes (attentional, motivational, perceptual), which has demonstrated empirically valid interventions, such as Cognitive Therapy of A. T. Beck and colleagues (Clark & Beck, 2010). This paper aims to provide a brief overview of a current cognitive model of social phobia based on information processing model that involves the theoretical model, the evaluation and psychotherapy suggested plan. Finally, this review examines available empirical evidence about of cognitive therapy and its advantages recognized by the scientific community compared to other psychotherapies regarding control groups, research methodologies and limitations.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background. Psychodynamic psychotherapy is a psychological treatment approach that has a growing empirical base. Research has indicated an association between therapist-facilitated affective experience and outcome in psychodynamic therapy. Affect-phobia therapy (APT), as outlined by McCullough et al., is a psychodynamic treatment that emphasizes a strong focus on expression and experience of affect. This model has neither been evaluated for depression nor anxiety disorders in a randomized controlled trial. While Internet-delivered psychodynamic treatments for depression and generalized anxiety disorder exist, they have not been based on APT. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to investigate the efficacy of an Internet-based, psychodynamic, guided self-help treatment based on APT for depression and anxiety disorders.Methods. One hundred participants with diagnoses of mood and anxiety disorders participated in a randomized (1:1 ratio) controlled trial of an active group versus a control condition. The treatment group received a 10-week, psychodynamic, guided self-help treatment based on APT that was delivered through the Internet. The treatment consisted of eight text-based treatment modules and included therapist contact (9.5 min per client and week, on average) in a secure online environment. Participants in the control group also received online therapist support and clinical monitoring of symptoms, but received no treatment modules. Outcome measures were the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-9) and the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7). Process measures were also included. All measures were administered weekly during the treatment period and at a 7-month follow-up.Results. Mixed models analyses using the full intention-to-treat sample revealed significant interaction effects of group and time on all outcome measures, when comparing treatment to the control group. A large between-group effect size of Cohen’s d = 0.77 (95% CI: 0.37–1.18) was found on the PHQ-9 and a moderately large between-group effect size d = 0.48 (95% CI: 0.08–0.87) was found on the GAD-7. The number of patients who recovered (had no diagnoses of depression and anxiety, and had less than 10 on both the PHQ-9 and the GAD-7) were at post-treatment 52% in the treatment group and 24% in the control group. This difference was significant, χ2(N = 100, d f = 1) = 8.3, p < .01. From post-treatment to follow-up, treatment gains were maintained on the PHQ-9, and significant improvements were seen on the GAD-7.Conclusion. This study provides initial support for the efficacy of Internet-delivered psychodynamic therapy based on the affect-phobia model in the treatment of depression and anxiety disorders. The results support the conclusion that psychodynamic treatment approaches may be transferred to the guided self-help format and delivered via the Internet.
    07/2013; 1:e102. DOI:10.7717/peerj.102