Article

Sensitivity and Specificity of Obesity Diagnosis in Pediatric Ambulatory Care in the United States

1Boston Medical Center/Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Clinical Pediatrics (Impact Factor: 1.26). 05/2013; 52(9). DOI: 10.1177/0009922813488648
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Objective. We examined the sensitivity and specificity of an obesity diagnosis in a nationally representative sample of pediatric outpatient visits. Methods. We used the 2005 to 2009 National Ambulatory Medical Care and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care surveys. We included visits with children 2 to 18 years, yielding a sample of 48 145 database visits. We determined 3 methods of identifying obesity: documented body mass index (BMI) ≥95th percentile; International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) code; and positive answer to the question, "Does the patient now have obesity?" Using BMI as the gold standard, we calculated the sensitivity and specificity of a clinical obesity diagnosis. Results. Among the 19.5% of children who were obese by BMI, 7.0% had an ICD-9 code and 15.2% had a positive response to questioning. The sensitivity of an obesity diagnosis was 15.4%, and the specificity was 99.2%. Conclusions. The sensitivity of the obesity diagnosis in pediatric ambulatory visits is low. Efforts are needed to increase identification of obese children.

0 Followers
 · 
41 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The use of national inpatient databases for spine surgery research has been increasing. Unfortunately, without firsthand knowledge of each specific database, it can be difficult to judge the validity of such studies. Large databases that rely on administrative data, such as International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes, may misrepresent patient information and could thus affect the results of studies that use this data. The present study uses obesity, an easily quantified and objective variable, as an example comorbidity to assess the accuracy of ICD-9 codes in the setting of their continued use in spine database studies. A cross-sectional study at a large academic medical center. All patients spending at least one night in the hospital as an inpatient between April 1, 2013 and April 16, 2013. Obstetrics and gynecology, psychiatry, and pediatric patients were excluded. Proportion of patients for whom ICD-9 obesity diagnosis codes assigned at hospital discharge match chart-documented BMI. The medical record was reviewed for each patient, and obesity ICD-9 codes were directly compared to documented body mass index (BMI). No known conflicts of interest exist for this study. The study included 2,075 patients. Of 573 "obese" patients (calculated BMI 30-39.9), only 109 received the correct code (278.00), giving this ICD-9 code a sensitivity of 0.19. Of 174 "morbidly obese" patients (calculated BMI > 40), only 84 received the correct code (278.01), giving this ICD-9 code a sensitivity of 0.48. Using obesity as an example, this study highlights the potential errors inherent to using ICD-9-coded databases for spine surgery research. Should a study based on such data use "obesity" as a variable in any analyses, the reader should interpret these results with caution. We further suggest that obesity is likely not the only comorbidity to which these results apply. As database research continues to represent an increasing proportion of publications in the field of spine surgery, it is important to realize that study outcomes can be skewed by data accuracy, and thus should not be blindly accepted simply by virtue of large sample sizes.
    The spine journal: official journal of the North American Spine Society 04/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2014.04.025 · 2.80 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: : Study Design. Cross-sectionalObjective. To objectively evaluate the ability of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes, which are used as the foundation for administratively coded national databases, to identify preoperative anemia in spinal fusion patients.Summary of Background Data. National database research in spine surgery continues to rise. However, the validity of studies based on administratively coded data, such as the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), are dependent on the accuracy of ICD-9 coding. Such coding has previously been found to have poor sensitivity for conditions such as obesity and infection.Methods. A cross-sectional study was performed at an academic medical center. Hospital-reported anemia ICD-9 codes (those used for administratively coded databases) were directly compared to the chart-documented preoperative hematocrits (true laboratory values). A patient was deemed to have preoperative anemia if the preoperative hematocrit was less than the lower end of the normal range (36.0% for females and 41.0% for males).Results. The study included 260 patients. Of these, 37 patients (14.2%) were anemic; however, only 10 patients (3.8%) received an "anemia" ICD-9 code. Of those coded as anemic, 7 of these 10 patients were anemic by definition, while 3 were not, and thus were miscoded. This equates to an ICD-9 code sensitivity of 0.19, with a specificity of 0.99, and positive and negative predictive values of 0.70 and 0.88, respectively.Conclusions. The current study uses preoperative anemia to demonstrate the potential inaccuracies of ICD-9 coding. These results have implications for publications using databases that are compiled from ICD-9 coding data. Furthermore, the findings of the current investigation raise concerns regarding the accuracy of additional comorbidities. Although administrative databases are powerful resources that provide large sample sizes, it is crucial that we further consider the quality of the data source relative to its intended purpose.
    Spine 09/2014; DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000598 · 2.45 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
8 Downloads
Available from
May 29, 2014