Reconsidering the Placebo Response from a Broad Anthropological Perspective

Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0030, USA.
Culture Medicine and Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 1.29). 01/2009; 33(1):112-52. DOI: 10.1007/s11013-008-9122-2
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This paper considers how the full range of human experience may catalyze a placebo response. The placebo effect has been characterized as something to control in clinical research, something to cultivate in clinical practice and something present in all healing encounters. We examine domains in which the term 'placebo' is used in discourse: clinical research, clinical practice, media representations of treatment efficacy and lay interpretations of placebo--an underresearched topic. We briefly review major theoretical frameworks proposed to explain the placebo effect: classical conditioning, expectancy, the therapeutic relationship and sociocultural 'meaning.' As a corrective to what we see as an overemphasis on conscious cognitive approaches to understanding placebo, we reorient the discussion to argue that direct embodied experience may take precedence over meaning-making in the healing encounter. As an example, we examine the neurobiology of rehearsing or visualizing wellness as a mode of directly (performatively) producing an outcome often dismissed as a 'placebo response.' Given body/mind/emotional resonance, we suggest that the placebo response is an evolutionarily adaptive trait and part of healing mechanisms operating across many levels--from genetic and cellular to social and cultural.

Download full-text


Available from: Mark Nichter, Jun 23, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The natural human response to illness is to seek to understand what is happening and to look for help from others. In all cultures, one finds healers, who provide explanations and offer care. Their interventions often have a placebo effect through activation of natural healing processes in the patient. Although placebo effects are relatively large and robust, physicians generally consider placebo treatment prescientific and deceptive. We review the determinants of the placebo response and show how a particular professional alliance between a patient and a caregiver is apt to equally affect treatment outcome. We distinguish the alliance effect from the placebo effect. We develop a comprehensive model of the medical alliance, on the basis of the concept of concordance, and review its relevance for clinical practice and medical education. The alliance effect represents a professional and ethical way of activating a patient's natural healing mechanisms.
    The Journal of nervous and mental disease 07/2013; 201(7):546-52. DOI:10.1097/NMD.0b013e31829829e1 · 1.81 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper investigates experiences of resilience in the context of individuals suffering from disability as a result of severe intractable seizure disorder and consequent hemispherectomy, a surgical procedure in which part or all of either the left or right cerebral hemisphere is removed. Two adults who underwent childhood hemispherectomies-one left and one right-are the focus of this study. Previous research has extensively detailed the clinical outcomes of this neurological procedure, yet the actual day-to-day experiences of individuals living post-hemispherectomy remains unexplored. Utilizing open-ended, qualitative, and narrative techniques from a phenomenology of performativity perspective, the authors question how each individual's experiences of daily living are invariably acts of resilience, involving several different strategies that are somewhat unique to each. Rather than working as an adjective or noun signifying certain environmental or individual attributes, this paper proposes that "resilience" is best conceptualized as the individualized intentional actions which disabled, distraught, or at risk individuals perform in contextually relevant and idiosyncratic ways as they navigate health and well-being within their local social and moral worlds.
    Culture Medicine and Psychiatry 11/2012; 37(1). DOI:10.1007/s11013-012-9294-7 · 1.29 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patients in the placebo arms of randomized controlled trials (RCT) often experience positive changes from baseline. While multiple theories concerning such "placebo effects" exist, peculiarly, none has been informed by actual interviews of patients undergoing placebo treatment. Here, we report on a qualitative study (n = 27) embedded within a RCT (n = 262) in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Besides identical placebo acupuncture treatment in the RCT, the qualitative study patients also received an additional set of interviews at the beginning, midpoint, and end of the trial. Interviews of the 12 qualitative subjects who underwent and completed placebo treatment were transcribed. We found that patients (1) were persistently concerned with whether they were receiving placebo or genuine treatment; (2) almost never endorsed "expectation" of improvement but spoke of "hope" instead and frequently reported despair; (3) almost all reported improvement ranging from dramatic psychosocial changes to unambiguous, progressive symptom improvement to tentative impressions of benefit; and (4) often worried whether their improvement was due to normal fluctuations or placebo effects. The placebo treatment was a problematic perturbation that provided an opportunity to reconstruct the experiences of the fluctuations of their illness and how it disrupted their everyday life. Immersion in this RCT was a co-mingling of enactment, embodiment and interpretation involving ritual performance and evocative symbols, shifts in bodily sensations, symptoms, mood, daily life behaviors, and social interactions, all accompanied by self-scrutiny and re-appraisal. The placebo effect involved a spectrum of factors and any single theory of placebo--e.g. expectancy, hope, conditioning, anxiety reduction, report bias, symbolic work, narrative and embodiment--provides an inadequate model to explain its salubrious benefits.
    Culture Medicine and Psychiatry 10/2009; 33(3):382-411. DOI:10.1007/s11013-009-9141-7 · 1.29 Impact Factor