Alternative Activation of Macrophages: An Immunologic Functional Perspective

Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RE, United Kingdom.
Annual Review of Immunology (Impact Factor: 39.33). 04/2009; 27(1):451-83. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132532
Source: PubMed


Macrophages are innate immune cells with well-established roles in the primary response to pathogens, but also in tissue homeostasis, coordination of the adaptive immune response, inflammation, resolution, and repair. These cells recognize danger signals through receptors capable of inducing specialized activation programs. The classically known macrophage activation is induced by IFN-gamma, which triggers a harsh proinflammatory response that is required to kill intracellular pathogens. Macrophages also undergo alternative activation by IL-4 and IL-13, which trigger a different phenotype that is important for the immune response to parasites. Here we review the cellular sources of these cytokines, receptor signaling pathways, and induced markers and gene signatures. We draw attention to discrepancies found between mouse and human models of alternative activation. The evidence for in vivo alternative activation of macrophages is also analyzed, with nematode infection as prototypic disease. Finally, we revisit the concept of macrophage activation in the context of the immune response.

Full-text preview

Available from:
    • "- CSF is a member of a discrete family of cytokines which also includes IL - 3 and IL - 5 which regulate the growth , differentiation , migration and effector function activities of many hematopoietic cells and leukocytes with receptors com - prised of a cytokine - specific alpha chain ( CSF2R ) and a shared beta chain ( CSF2 - R ) for signaling ( Martinez et al . , 2009 ) . Although this cytokine family appears very poorly conserved ( Huising et al . , 2006 ) , the existence of CSF2 - R in fish genomes has been previously described ( Liongue and Ward , 2007 ) . Only recently , can - didates for IL - 3 / IL - 5 / GM - CSF family members have been identified in the elephant shark genome ( Dijkstra , 2014"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this review, we support taking polarized immune responses in teleost fish from a 'macrophage first' point of view, a hypothesis that reverts the dichotomous T helper (TH)1 and TH2 driving forces by building on the idea of conservation of innate immune responses in lower vertebrates. It is plausible that the initial trigger for macrophage polarization into M1 (inflammation) or M2 (healing) could rely only on sensing microbial/parasite infection or other innate danger signals, without the influence of adaptive immunity. Given the long and ongoing debate on the presence/absence of a typical TH1 cytokine environment and, in particular, TH2 cytokine environment in fish immune responses, it stands out that the presence of macrophages with polarized phenotypes, alike M1 and M2, have been relatively easy to demonstrate for fish. We summarize in short present knowledge in teleost fish on those cytokines considered most critical to the dichotomous development of TH1/M1 and TH2/M2 polarization, in particular, but not exclusively, interferon-γ and interleukin (IL)-4/IL-13. We review, in more detail, polarization of fish immune responses taken from the macrophage point of view for which we adopted the simple nomenclature of M1 and M2. We discuss inducible nitric oxide synthase, or NOS-2, as a reliable M1 marker and arginase-2 as a reliable M2 marker for teleost fish and discuss the value of these macrophage markers for the generation of zebrafish reporter lines to study M1/M2 polarization in vivo.
    Molecular Immunology 10/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.molimm.2015.09.026 · 2.97 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "M2 macrophages, together with Th2 cells, remove parasites and toxins by releasing IL-4, which promotes the activation of B-cells and the production of antigen-specific antibodies [8] [33]. In addition, M2 macrophages participate in tissue repair, angiogenesis, and phagocytosis of apoptotic cells [34] [35] [36]. Thus, the reprogramming of macrophages causes changes not only in the functioning of the macrophages themselves but also in the functioning of other immune cells, thus providing the required plasticity of the immune response required for eliminating pathogenic factors. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Macrophages play a key role in immunity. In this review, we consider the traditional notion of macrophage plasticity, data that do not fit into existing concepts, and a hypothesis for existence of a new switch macrophage phenotype. Depending on the microenvironment, macrophages can reprogram their phenotype toward the proinflammatory M1 phenotype or toward the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype. Macrophage reprogramming involves well-coordinated changes in activities of signalling and posttranslational mechanisms. Macrophage reprogramming is provided by JNK-, PI3K/Akt-, Notch-, JAK/STAT-, TGF- β -, TLR/NF- κ B-, and hypoxia-dependent pathways. Posttranscriptional regulation is based on micro-mRNA. We have hypothesized that, in addition to the M1 and M2 phenotypes, an M3 switch phenotype exists. This switch phenotype responds to proinflammatory stimuli with reprogramming towards the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype or, contrarily, it responds to anti-inflammatory stimuli with reprogramming towards the proinflammatory M1 phenotype. We have found signs of such a switch phenotype in lung diseases. Understanding the mechanisms of macrophage reprogramming will assist in the selection of new therapeutic targets for correction of impaired immunity.
    09/2015; 2015(13):341308. DOI:10.1155/2015/341308
  • Source
    • "Mediators of Inflammation that mediate the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), whereas the " M2 " alternate macrophage responses are seen in the compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome (CARS), parasitic infections, tumor growth promotion , and healing [9]. M1 and M2 macrophage activation states have been described in detail [10] [11]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In a swine model of ischemia/reperfusion injury coupled with sepsis, we have previously shown attenuation of secondary organ injury and decreased mortality with negative pressure therapy (NPT). We hypothesized that NPT modulates the intestinal microenvironment by mediating the innate immune system. Sepsis was induced in 12 anesthetized female pigs. Group 1 (n = 6) was decompressed at 12 hrs after injury (T 12) and treated with standard of care (SOC), and group 2 (n = 6) with NPT for up to T 48. Immunoparalysis was evident as lymphocytopenia at T 24 in both groups; however, survival was improved in the NPT group versus SOC (Odds ratio = 4.0). The SOC group showed significant reduction in lymphocyte numbers compared to NPT group by T 48 (p < 0.05). The capacity of peritoneal fluid to stimulate a robust reactive oxygen species response in vitro was greater for the NPT group, peaking at T 24 for both M1 (p = 0.0197) and M2 macrophages (p = 0.085). Plasma elicited little if any effect which was confirmed by microarray analysis. In this septic swine model NPT appeared to modulate the intestinal microenvironment, facilitating an early robust, yet transient, host defense mediated by M1 and M2 macrophages. NPT may help overcome immunoparalysis that occurs during inflammatory response to septic injury.
    Mediators of Inflammation 08/2015; 2015(5):419841. DOI:10.1155/2015/419841 · 3.24 Impact Factor
Show more