Liability associated with obstetric anesthesia: a closed claims analysis.

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Anesthesiology (Impact Factor: 6.17). 01/2009; 110(1):131-9. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318190e16a
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Obstetrics carries high medical liability risk. Maternal death and newborn death/brain damage were the most common complications in obstetric anesthesia malpractice claims before 1990. As the liability profile may have changed over the past two decades, the authors reviewed recent obstetric claims in the American Society of Anesthesiologists Closed Claims database.
Obstetric anesthesia claims for injuries from 1990 to 2003 (1990 or later claims; n = 426) were compared to obstetric claims for injuries before 1990 (n = 190). Chi-square and z tests compared categorical variables; payment amounts were compared using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.
Compared to pre-1990 obstetric claims, the proportion of maternal death (P = 0.002) and newborn death/brain damage (P = 0.048) decreased, whereas maternal nerve injury (P < 0.001) and maternal back pain (P = 0.012) increased in 1990 or later claims. In 1990 or later claims, payment was made on behalf of the anesthesiologist in only 21% of newborn death/brain damage claims compared to 60% of maternal death/brain damage claims (P < 0.001). These payments in both groups were associated with an anesthesia contribution to the injury (P < 0.001) and substandard anesthesia care (P < 0.001). Anesthesia-related newborn death/brain damage claims had an increased proportion of delays in anesthetic care (P = 0.001) and poor communication (P = 0.007) compared to claims unrelated to anesthesia.
Newborn death/brain damage has decreased, yet it remains a leading cause of obstetric anesthesia malpractice claims over time. Potentially preventable anesthetic causes of newborn injury included delays in anesthesia care and poor communication between the obstetrician and anesthesiologist.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ultrasound has permeated the practice of anesthesiology and is becoming an essential tool for the obstetric anesthesiologist in the labor and delivery suite. The most common applications include guidance for neuraxial (epidural and spinal) anesthesia and acute pain nerve blocks, as well as guidance for central and peripheral vascular access. Obstetric anesthesiologists are becoming increasingly familiar with diagnostic applications, including transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and lung and gastric ultrasound. There is intense interest in developing standard curricula for achieving competency in ultrasound skills during residency training and expanding the role of ultrasound in education and research.
    Seminars in Perinatology 10/2014; 38(6). DOI:10.1053/j.semperi.2014.07.006 · 2.42 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: This prospective observational study aimed to investigate the surgical claim that spinal anesthesia in elective cesarean section in educational setting increases operating room time. Material and Methods: ASA I-II 120 elective cesarean section parturients were grouped into spinal and general anesthesia groups. Both techniques were performed by residents under consultant supervision. Demographic characteristics of parturients, different time intervals as abbreviated with tready (entry of the patient into operating room-readiness for surgery), tincision (entry of the patient-skin incision), thysterotomy (skin incision-hysterotomy), thysterotomy-delivery (hysterotomy-cord clamping), temergence (end of the operation-entry to the postoperative care unit), toperation (start-end of surgery), toperating room (entry-exit from the operating room), type, and amount of fluid and dosages of ephedrine administered were recorded. Newborn demographic data, Apgar scores and results of the umbilical venous gas analysis were noted. Results: Demographics, and parturients’ characteristics were similar in both groups. Spinal anesthesia was associated with longer tready, tincision, thysterotomy, thysterotomy-delivery times whereas general anesthesia resulted in prolonged temergence times. Operating room time were similar (72.9±16.7 vs 70.2±12.9 min for spinal and general anesthesia, respectively). Spinal anesthesia parturients had higher crystalloid and ephedrine requirements. No statistical significance was detected in demographic data of newborns and related PCO2 values. In the general anesthesia group, newborns had higher PO2 (36.7±14.2 vs 28.1±7.8 mmHg; p<0.001) and lower pH values (7.32±0.04 vs 7.34±0.06; p=0.049 compared to the spinal anesthesia group, although not reflected in Apgar scores. Conclusion: Contrary to surgical claims, choice of spinal anesthesia as anesthetic technique does not increase operating room time when compared to general anesthesia.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Continuous spinal anesthesia may provide excellent labor analgesia. The incidence of accidental intrathecal injection of megadose of ropivacaine, as one of the possible complications during cesarean section, is very rare. Present case report provides reference to clinical practice.
    International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine 01/2014; 7(8):2383-5. · 1.42 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 4, 2014