Biosorbents for heavy metals removal and their future.

Laboratory of Environmental Technology, INET, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, PR China.
Biotechnology advances (Impact Factor: 8.91). 03/2009; 27(2):195-226. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.11.002
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A vast array of biological materials, especially bacteria, algae, yeasts and fungi have received increasing attention for heavy metal removal and recovery due to their good performance, low cost and large available quantities. The biosorbent, unlike mono functional ion exchange resins, contains variety of functional sites including carboxyl, imidazole, sulphydryl, amino, phosphate, sulfate, thioether, phenol, carbonyl, amide and hydroxyl moieties. Biosorbents are cheaper, more effective alternatives for the removal of metallic elements, especially heavy metals from aqueous solution. In this paper, based on the literatures and our research results, the biosorbents widely used for heavy metal removal were reviewed, mainly focusing on their cellular structure, biosorption performance, their pretreatment, modification, regeneration/reuse, modeling of biosorption (isotherm and kinetic models), the development of novel biosorbents, their evaluation, potential application and future. The pretreatment and modification of biosorbents aiming to improve their sorption capacity was introduced and evaluated. Molecular biotechnology is a potent tool to elucidate the mechanisms at molecular level, and to construct engineered organisms with higher biosorption capacity and selectivity for the objective metal ions. The potential application of biosorption and biosorbents was discussed. Although the biosorption application is facing the great challenge, there are two trends for the development of the biosorption process for metal removal. One trend is to use hybrid technology for pollutants removal, especially using living cells. Another trend is to develop the commercial biosorbents using immobilization technology, and to improve the biosorption process including regeneration/reuse, making the biosorbents just like a kind of ion exchange resin, as well as to exploit the market with great endeavor.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: h i g h l i g h t s Novel Halomonas strain was isolated from electronic industry effluent. Characterization of the strain was studied in detail. The bacterium has an adsorption capacity of 12.023 mg g À1 for cadmium. Removal of cadmium is by surface adsorption. The adsorption suits Langmuir isotherm and pseudo second order models. g r a p h i c a l a b s t r a c t a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Heavy metal clean-up from electronic industry effluents is an important issue to be addressed. In this work, we report for the first time the isolation of a novel bacterial strain of Halomonas from electronic industry effluent and its subsequent utility for the adsorption of cadmium. The microbial community was characterised using various biochemical and molecular techniques. The bacterial surface possessing hydroxyl, carboxyl and amino groups play a vital role in this host guest interaction. Three strains of Halomonas species were isolated from these effluents, among which Halomonas BVR 1 was found to be an excellent host to the divalent cadmium. The influence of various analytical parameters on the adsorption of cadmium was studied in detail. The surface characterization of the adsorbent was done through FT-IR and SEM–EDAX techniques. Adsorption thermodynamics was spontaneous and exother-mic. Halomonas BVR 1 sp. was found to be highly resistant to cadmium with a minimal inhibitory con-centration of 250 mg L À1 . Cadmium was quantitatively adsorbed above pH 8 in accordance with the pseudo second order kinetics and Langmuir isotherm model with an adsorption capacity of 12.023 mg g À1 . The obtained results indicated that Halomonas BVR 1 species is very effective in adsorb-ing cadmium thereby opening its doors to the clean-up process of heavy metals from electronic indus-try effluent. Ó 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
    Chemical Engineering Journal 06/2013; · 4.06 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 01/2012; 21(4):853-859. · 0.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Desalination and water treatment 01/2014; · 0.99 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 1, 2014