Reactive oxygen species delay control of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus

1] Institute of Experimental Immunology, University Hospital of Zurich, Schmelzbergstrasse 12, Zurich 8091, Switzerland [2] Campbell Family Institute for Breast Cancer Research, Ontario Cancer Institute, University Health Network, 620 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C1 Canada [3] Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University of Düsseldorf, Universitätsstrasse 1, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany.
Cell Death and Differentiation (Impact Factor: 8.18). 04/2013; 40(4):649-58. DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2012.167
Source: PubMed


Cluster of differentiation (CD)8(+) T cells are like a double edged sword during chronic viral infections because they not only promote virus elimination but also induce virus-mediated immunopathology. Elevated levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been reported during virus infections. However, the role of ROS in T-cell-mediated immunopathology remains unclear. Here we used the murine lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus to explore the role of ROS during the processes of virus elimination and induction of immunopathology. We found that virus infection led to elevated levels of ROS producing granulocytes and macrophages in virus-infected liver and spleen tissues that were triggered by the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase. Lack of the regulatory subunit p47phox of the NADPH oxidase diminished ROS production in these cells. While CD8(+) T cells exhibited ROS production that was independent of NADPH oxidase expression, survival and T-cell function was elevated in p47phox-deficient (Ncf1(-/-)) mice. In the absence of p47phox, enhanced T-cell immunity promoted virus elimination and blunted corresponding immunopathology. In conclusion, we find that NADPH-mediated production of ROS critically impairs the immune response, impacting elimination of virus and outcome of liver cell damage.

Download full-text


Available from: Dirk Brenner, Oct 02, 2015
35 Reads
  • Source
    • "The study further showed that KC responded to type I IFN by inducing the expression of interferon-stimulated genes, and that mice lacking IFNAR specifically on macrophages exhibited strongly enhanced viral titers. However , recently a detrimental influence of granulocytes and macrophages in spleen and liver was reported by their ability to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) following viral infection, although ROS production by liver F4/80 + cells was low [53]. Importantly, the effect of ROS was an impairment of the immune response, and in the absence of ROS mice exhibited lower viral titers and less liver damage. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Globally, over 500 million people are chronically infected with the hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV). These chronic infections cause liver inflammation, and may result in fibrosis/cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. Albeit that HBV and HCV differ in various aspects, clearance, persistence and immunopathology of either infection depends on the interplay between the innate and adaptive responses in the liver. Kupffer cells, the liver-resident macrophages, are abundantly present in the sinusoids of the liver. These cells have been shown to be crucial players to maintain homeostasis, but also contribute to pathology. However, it is important to note that especially during pathology, Kupffer cells are difficult to distinguish from infiltrating monocytes/macrophages and other myeloid cells. In this review we discuss our current understanding of Kupffer cells, and assess their role in the regulation of anti-viral immunity and disease pathogenesis during HBV and HCV infection.
    Journal of Hepatology 05/2014; 61(3). DOI:10.1016/j.jhep.2014.04.026 · 11.34 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are deadly weapons used by phagocytes and other cell types, such as lung epithelial cells, against pathogens. ROS can kill pathogens directly by causing oxidative damage to biocompounds or indirectly by stimulating pathogen elimination by various nonoxidative mechanisms, including pattern recognition receptors signaling, autophagy, neutrophil extracellular trap formation, and T-lymphocyte responses. Thus, one should expect that the inhibition of ROS production promote infection. Increasing evidences support that in certain particular infections, antioxidants decrease and prooxidants increase pathogen burden. In this study, we review the classic infections that are controlled by ROS and the cases in which ROS appear as promoters of infection, chal-lenging the paradigm. We discuss the possible mechanisms by which ROS could promote particular infections. These mechanisms are still not completely clear but include the metabolic effects of ROS on pathogen physiology, ROS-induced damage to the immune system, and ROS-induced activation of immune defense mechanisms that are subsequently hijacked by particular pathogens to act against more effective microbicidal mechanisms of the immune system. The effective use of antioxidants as therapeutic agents against certain infections is a realistic possibility that is beginning to be applied against viruses. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 00, 000–000. I. Introduction II. Antioxidants and Their Mode of Action III. ROS Can Promote Pathogen Elimination by Direct Oxidative Damage or by a Variety of Innate and Adaptive Mechanisms A. Direct oxidative damage to microbes B. O 2 -c promotes enzymatic elimination of microorganisms indirectly C. ROS promote autophagy D. ROS inhibit mTOR kinase, triggering an antiviral response E. ROS promote NETosis F. ROS promote cell death of infected reservoirs G. PRRs use ROS as signaling intermediaries in inflammation H. ROS are chemoattractors to phagocytes I. ROS can activate NRF2-target genes, a part of the antioxidant defense response that interferes with innate immunity J. ROS interfere with iron storage and tissue mobilization, influencing iron availability to pathogens K. ROS interfere with lipid metabolism and foam cell formation L. ROS influence phagosomal proteolysis through cathepsin inactivation M. ROS interfere with protein immunogenicity, antigenic presentation, Th polarization, and co-stimulation by dendritic cells IV. Pathogens That ROS Contribute to Eliminating A. Bacterial infections combated by ROS B. Viral infections combated by ROS
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Measles virus (MV) is known for its ability to cause an acute infection with a potential of development of persistent infection. However, knowledge of how viral genes and cellular factors interact to cause or maintain the persistent infection has remained unclear. We have previously reported the possible involvement of mitochondrial short chain enoyl-CoA hydratase (ECHS), which is localized at mitochondria, in the regulation of MV replication. In this study we found increased functions of mitochondria in MV-persistently infected cells compared with uninfected or acutely infected cells. Furthermore, impairment of mitochondrial functions by treatment with mitochondrial inhibitors such as ethidium bromide (EtBr) or carbonyl cyanide-p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (FCCP) induced the cytopathic effects of extensive syncytial formation in persistently infected cells. These findings suggest that mitochondria are one of the subcellular organelles contributing to regulate persistent infection of MV. Recent studies showed mitochondria provide an integral platform for retinoic acid-inducible protein (RIG-I)-like cytosolic receptors (RLRs) signaling and participate in cellular innate antiviral immunity. Our findings not only reveal a role of mitochondria in RLR mediated antiviral signaling but also suggest that mitochondria contribute to the regulation of persistent viral infection.
    Antiviral research 07/2013; 99(3). DOI:10.1016/j.antiviral.2013.06.016 · 3.94 Impact Factor
Show more