Open Abdomen Management With Human Acellular Dermal Matrix in Liver Transplant Recipients
ABSTRACT Abdominal wall closure after liver transplantation is not always feasible and may result in increased intra-abdominal pressure along with associated complications. Various temporary closure techniques as well as open wound management have been used to address this complex problem. The aim of this series was to describe an approach to definitive wound closure of the open abdomen in liver transplant patients.
We performed a retrospective review of all liver transplant patients at our institution from September 2005 to November 2007. The management of the open abdomen in 10 liver transplant patients was reviewed, and a novel approach described to manage these defects.
Ten patients with open wounds were closed during the study period using human acellular dermal matrix (HADM). There were 7 men and 3 women of median age 55 years. Average size of HADM was 235 cm(2). The median follow-up is 10 months with no incidence of evisceration or hernia. In 1 patient, the graft failed along the lateral side due to infection; it dislodged during vacuum-assisted closure dressing change in another patient at 5 months after closure. Fascial closure was not possible due to organ edema (n = 3), a large liver (n = 4) or wound infection with dehiscence (n = 3).
HADM can be used for primary wound closure in both clean and contaminated wounds as an alternative to an open abdomen post-liver transplantation.
- SourceAvailable from: Dan CullinaneThe Journal of trauma 08/2011; 71(2):502-12. DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e318227220c · 2.96 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This research is concerned with a stability control method with a criterion based on reaction for motion control of a mobile manipulator. Mobile manipulators can propel themselves around a work area and can operate over a wide area. Then, a stability evaluation and a stability control method must be required for mobile manipulators that are not fixed on a floor. The evaluation method based on ZMP (Zero Moment Point) criterion, in which the model is regarded as a particle system, is not satisfactory for evaluating stability of a mobile manipulator that consists of solid links. In addition, transient state during tipping over has not been discussed. In this paper, we propose a stability evaluation criterion based on reaction for the solid model of a dynamic mobile manipulator. First, equations of motion of the mobile manipulator for stable and unstable states of motion are formulated based on constraint conditions. Second, a stability criterion based on reaction is proposed by referring the formulated model. Third, the relationships between changes in reaction and changes in ZMP during tipping over are discussed through simulations. Finally, it is shown that a mobile manipulator can return from unstable transient state to stable state by performing stability compensation motion.SICE 2003 Annual Conference; 09/2003
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Abdominal wall closure in pediatric solid organ recipients may be confounded by donor size discrepancy and structural insults from previous surgery. Here we describe the novel use of vascularized donor abdominal wall posterior rectus sheath fascia, as a composite tissue allotransplant (CTA), to achieve abdominal wall closure in a liver and double kidney pediatric recipient who could not be closed primarily due to donor/recipient size mismatch. The posterior rectus sheath fascia was procured in continuity with the liver and falciform ligament. Blood supply was achieved using the single hepatic artery anastomosis as part of the standard liver transplantation procedure. Specimens of posterior rectus sheath fascia taken on postoperative days 3 and 30 showed no signs of acute rejection. The patient succumbed to an overwhelming fungal infection on day 51, with no signs of intraabdominal involvement. The patient received no additional immunosuppression in conjunction with the posterior rectus sheath fascia allotransplant.American Journal of Transplantation 12/2010; 10(12):2712-6. DOI:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03331.x · 6.19 Impact Factor