Direct bacterial profiling by matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry for identification of pathogenic Neisseria.

Research Institute of Physical and Chemical Medicine, Russian Federation Health Ministry, Moscow, Russia.
Journal of Molecular Diagnostics (Impact Factor: 3.96). 01/2009; 11(1):75-86. DOI: 10.2353/jmoldx.2009.080079
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The present study investigates the suitability of direct bacterial profiling as a tool for the identification and subtyping of pathogenic Neisseria. The genus Neisseria includes two human pathogens, Neisseria meningitidis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, as well as several nonpathogenic Neisseria species. Here, a matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry profiling protocol was optimized using a laboratory strain of E. coli DH5alpha to guarantee high quality and reproducible results. Subsequently, mass spectra for both laboratory and clinical strains of N. gonorrhoeae, N. meningitidis, and several nonpathogenic Neisseria species were collected. Significant interspecies differences but little intraspecies diversity were revealed by means of a visual inspection and bioinformatics examination using the MALDI BioTyper software. Cluster analysis successfully separated mass spectra collected from three groups that corresponded to N. gonorrhoeae, N. meningitidis, and nonpathogenic Neisseria isolates. Requiring only one bacterial colony for testing and using a fast and easy measuring protocol, this approach represents a powerful tool for the rapid identification of pathogenic Neisseria and can be adopted for other microorganisms.


Available from: Thomas Maier, Jun 03, 2015
1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bacterial culture was the first method used to describe the human microbiota, but this method is considered outdated by many researchers. Metagenomics studies have since been applied to clinical microbiology; however, a "dark matter" of prokaryotes, which corresponds to a hole in our knowledge and includes minority bacterial populations, is not elucidated by these studies. By replicating the natural environment, environmental microbiologists were the first to reduce the "great plate count anomaly," which corresponds to the difference between microscopic and culture counts. The revolution in bacterial identification also allowed rapid progress. 16S rRNA bacterial identification allowed the accurate identification of new species. Mass spectrometry allowed the high-throughput identification of rare species and the detection of new species. By using these methods and by increasing the number of culture conditions, culturomics allowed the extension of the known human gut repertoire to levels equivalent to those of pyrosequencing. Finally, taxonogenomics strategies became an emerging method for describing new species, associating the genome sequence of the bacteria systematically. We provide a comprehensive review on these topics, demonstrating that both empirical and hypothesis-driven approaches will enable a rapid increase in the identification of the human prokaryote repertoire. Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
    Clinical Microbiology Reviews 01/2015; 28(1):237-264. DOI:10.1128/CMR.00014-14 · 16.00 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: On the basis of various guidelines for drinking-water quality, five species of bacteria (Helicobacter pylori, Salmonella typhimurium, Yersinia enterocolitica, Legionella pneumophila, and Campylobacter jejuni) were selected as representatives of waterborne microbial pathogens. Matrix-associated laser-desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) analysis was conducted to identify the five bacteria, and the MALDI-TOF MS results were compared with results obtained through 16S rRNA identification. The MALDI-TOF MS analysis yielded score values of 1.60 ? 0.19, 2.41 ? 0.09, 2.37 ? 0.16, 2.19 ? 0.15, and 1.85 ? 0.08 for H. pylori, S. typhimurium, Y. enterocolitica, L. pneumophila, and C. jejuni, respectively. In addition, the MALDI-TOF identification results were well-correlated with those from the 16S rRNA identification. This study suggests that MALDI-TOF-based identification is an inexpensive, rapid, reproducible, and accurate alternative method for the identification of waterborne microbial pathogens in aquatic environments.
    Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology 11/2014; 8(5):3525-3530. · 0.07 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Frontiers in Plant Science 03/2015; 6:184. DOI:10.3389/fpls.2015.00184 · 3.64 Impact Factor