Diagnostic Accuracy of 64-Slice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography. A Prospective, Multicenter, Multivendor Study

Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (Impact Factor: 15.34). 01/2009; 52(25):2135-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.058
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study sought to determine the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA) to detect or rule out significant coronary artery disease (CAD).
CTCA is emerging as a noninvasive technique to detect coronary atherosclerosis.
We conducted a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study involving 360 symptomatic patients with acute and stable anginal syndromes who were between 50 and 70 years of age and were referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography (CCA) from September 2004 through June 2006. All patients underwent a nonenhanced calcium scan and a CTCA, which was compared with CCA. No patients or segments were excluded because of impaired image quality attributable to either coronary motion or calcifications. Patient-, vessel-, and segment-based sensitivities and specificities were calculated to detect or rule out significant CAD, defined as >or=50% lumen diameter reduction.
The prevalence among patients of having at least 1 significant stenosis was 68%. In a patient-based analysis, the sensitivity for detecting patients with significant CAD was 99% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 98% to 100%), specificity was 64% (95% CI: 55% to 73%), positive predictive value was 86% (95% CI: 82% to 90%), and negative predictive value was 97% (95% CI: 94% to 100%). In a segment-based analysis, the sensitivity was 88% (95% CI: 85% to 91%), specificity was 90% (95% CI: 89% to 92%), positive predictive value was 47% (95% CI: 44% to 51%), and negative predictive value was 99% (95% CI: 98% to 99%).
Among patients in whom a decision had already been made to obtain CCA, 64-slice CTCA was reliable for ruling out significant CAD in patients with stable and unstable anginal syndromes. A positive 64-slice CTCA scan often overestimates the severity of atherosclerotic obstructions and requires further testing to guide patient management.

Download full-text


Available from: Benno Rensing, Aug 25, 2015
  • Source
    • "MDCTA has emerged as a robust technique for the assessment of coronary artery anatomy and disease with accuracy comparable to invasive coronary angiography [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. Owing to a high negative predictive value, coronary MDCTA may be suitable as a primary screening tool for those symptomatic patients with low probability of coronary artery disease [1]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose. To compare radiation dose and image quality using predefined narrow phase window versus complete phase window with dose modulation during R-R using 320-row MDCTA. Methods. 114 patients underwent coronary CTA study using 320-row MDCT scanner. 87 patients with mean age (61 + 13 years), mean BMI (29 + 6), and mean heart rate (HR) (58 + 7 bpm) were imaged at predefined 66-80% R-R interval and then reconstructed at 75% while 27 patients with mean age (63 + 16 years), mean BMI (28 + 5), and mean HR (57 + 7 bpm) were scanned throughout the complete R-R interval with tube current modulation. The effective dose (ED) was calculated from dose length product (DLP) and conversion k (0.014 mSv/mGy/cm). Image quality was assessed using a three-point ordinal scale (1 = excellent, 2 = good, and 3 = nondiagnostic). Results. Both groups were statistically similar to each other with reference of HR (P = 0.59), BMI (P = 0.17), and tube current mAs (P = 0.68). The median radiation dose was significantly higher in those scanned with complete R-R phase window versus narrow phase window (P < 0.0001). Independently of patient and scan parameters, increased phase window was associated with higher radiation dose (P < 0.001). Image quality was better among those scanned with narrow phase window versus complete phase window (P < 0.0001). Conclusion. Our study supports that good HR control and predefined narrow window acquisition result in lower radiation dose without compromising diagnostic image quality for coronary disease evaluation.
    The Scientific World Journal 12/2013; 2013:731590. DOI:10.1155/2013/731590 · 1.73 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Rupture-prone and ruptured plaques are characterized by the presence of large numbers of macrophages. N1177 is a contrast agent consisting of iodinated nanoparticles that are selectively phagocytosed by macrophages. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of N1177 on the CT attenuation of rupture-prone and ruptured plaques in rabbits. In addition, we examined in vitro whether uptake of N1177 occurred without cytotoxic or pro-inflammatory effects on macrophages. In vitro, the viability of J774 macrophages was not affected by treatment with N1177. Moreover, N1177 had no effect on the phagocytic capacity or cytokine production of macrophages. For the in vivo experiments, 6 New Zealand White rabbits were fed a cholesterol-supplemented diet for 12–15months, resulting in the development of large atherosclerotic plaques that resembled rupture-prone plaques in humans. In three rabbits, mechanical plaque rupture was induced by retrograde pullback of an embolic protection device. N1177 had no effect on the median density of rupture-prone plaques [35HU (range 3–85) before injection vs. 32HU (range 1–93) 2h after injection of N1177; P>0.05]. However, after induction of mechanical plaque rupture, the median density of the atherosclerotic plaques increased from 40HU (range 6–86) before injection to 74HU (range 14–111) 2h after injection of N1177 (P<0.001). Using time-of-flight static secondary ion mass spectrometry, the presence of N1177 nanoparticles was demonstrated in macrophage-rich areas of ruptured plaques, but not of non-ruptured plaques. In conclusion, our results show that N1177 is a contrast agent that can identify ruptured atherosclerotic plaques.
    Archiv für Kreislaufforschung 01/2010; 105(1):51-59. DOI:10.1007/s00395-009-0052-0 · 5.96 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Given the large number of individuals presenting to emergency departments with acute, undifferentiated chest pain and the frequent difficulty in discerning its etiology, there has been great interest in developing techniques that can improve the initial triage of these patients. The ‘Triple Rule Out” CT has recently been touted as a tool to quickly assess for life threatening causes of acute chest pain, namely acute coronary syndrome, pulmonary embolism, and aortic dissection. Initial studies suggest that this protocol is safe and compares favorably with the dedicated CT protocols but at the cost of increased doses of iodinated contrast and radiation. New scanner technology has started to address these limitations but the “Triple Rule Out” CT is still in its infancy. It remains to be seen whether or not this application can ultimately improve diagnostic efficiency, cost, and/or clinical decision making.
    Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports 10/2012; 5(5). DOI:10.1007/s12410-012-9152-6
Show more