CTLA-4 genotype and relapse incidence in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission after induction chemotherapy.

Hematology Department, Institut Catalàd'Oncologia, Girona, L'Hospitalet and Badalona, Spain.
Leukemia: official journal of the Leukemia Society of America, Leukemia Research Fund, U.K (Impact Factor: 10.16). 01/2009; 23(3):486-91. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2008.339
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The recently described single-nucleotide polymorphism CT60, located in the 3'-untranslated region of the CTLA4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 ) gene, has been associated with susceptibility to several autoimmune diseases and has also been shown to be involved in immune responses following allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). However, the contribution of the CTLA4 genotype to the control of minimal residual disease in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has yet to be explored. We investigated the association between the CTLA4 CT60 A/G genotype and the incidence of leukemic relapse in 143 adult patients with AML in first complete remission after the same chemotherapy protocol (CETLAM LAM'03). The CT60 AA genotype was associated with a higher rate of leukemic relapse (56.4 vs 35.6%, P=0.004; hazard ratio (HR)=2.64, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.36-5.14) and lower overall survival at 3 years (39.4 vs 68.4%, P=0.004; HR=2.80, 95% CI=1.39-5.64). This is the first study to report an association between polymorphisms at CTLA-4 and AML relapse.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The adaptive immune system has the capacity to recognize and kill leukemic cells. However, immune tolerance mechanisms that normally protect healthy tissues from autoimmune effects prevent the development of effective antitumor immunity. Tumors use several different immunosuppressive mechanisms to evade otherwise effective T-cell responses. A growing number of immune evasion mechanisms have been characterized mainly in solid tumors. In hematological malignancies, less is known about how different immune escape mechanisms influence tumor immune evasion and the extent of their impact on ongoing immune responses. The present review highlights the potential role of three well-defined immunosuppressive mechanisms in hematological malignancies: (i) inhibitory T-cell pathways (especially programmed death ligand 1/programmed death 1 (PD-L1/PD-1)), (ii) regulatory immune cells, and (iii) metabolic enzymes such as indoeamine-2,3-dioxygenase (IDO). The possible therapeutic targeting of these pathways is also discussed. Exciting new strategies that might affect future antileukemia immunotherapy include monoclonal antibodies that block inhibitory T-cell pathways (PD-1/PD-L1) and the prevention of tryptophan depletion by IDO inhibitors. Furthermore, the clinical effect of several chemotherapeutic drugs may arise from the targeting of immunosuppressive cells. Evidence for a new feedback mechanism to suppress the function of regulatory immune cells was recently provided by the identification and characterization of spontaneous cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses against regulatory immune cells. Such specific CTLs may be immensely useful in anticancer immunotherapy (for example, by anticancer vaccination). The targeting of one or more immunosuppressive pathways may be especially interesting in combination with antileukemic immunotherapy in cases in which immunosuppressive mechanisms antagonize the desired effects of the therapy.Leukemia advance online publication, 1 April 2014; doi:10.1038/leu.2014.108.
    Leukemia: official journal of the Leukemia Society of America, Leukemia Research Fund, U.K 03/2014; · 10.16 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Determinative associations may exist between costimulatory molecule gene polymorphisms with a variety of post hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) viral related clinical outcomes especially acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD). Therefore in this study the associations between costimulatory molecule gene polymorphisms including: cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA4), programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), inducible T cell costimulator (ICOS), and cluster differentiation 28 (CD28) with active cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection were evaluated in HSCT patients. The 72 allogeneic HSCT patients with and without aGVHD were enrolled in this cross sectional study between years: 2004-2011. The single nucleotide polymorphisms in loci of the costimulatory molecules including: CTLA4 gene (-318 C/T, 1722 T/C, 1661 A/G, +49 A/G), PD-1 gene (PD-1.3 A/G, PD-1.9 C/T), ICOS gene (1720 C/T), and CD28 gene (+17 C/T) were analyzed in studied HSCT patients by PCR-RFLP methods. The active CMV infection was evaluated in fresh EDTA-treated blood samples of each allogeneic HSCT patients by CMV antigenemia kit according to manufacturer's instruction. Active CMV infection was found in 11 of 72 (15.27 %) of allogeneic HSCT patients. The T allele and TT genotype of the CD28 +17 C/T were significantly higher frequency in active CMV infected allogeneic HSCT patients experienced aGVHD. The G allele and GG genotype of the CTLA4 -1661 A/G were significantly higher frequent in active CMV infected allogeneic HSCT patients experienced low grade of aGVHD. Finally, finding of significant associations between CD28 +17 C/T and CTLA4 -1661 A/G genotypes with CMV active infection in allogeneic HSCT patients experienced aGVHD emphasize on the importance of the genetic pattern of costimulatory genes in outcomes of active CMV infection in HSCT patients needs completed studies.
    Molecular Biology Reports 09/2013; · 2.51 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: One reason for genetic variations among human individuals is SNP which may confer diverse disease susceptibility or resistance in a population. Genetic variations in a key immunoregulatory agent can manifest various immunological responses, such as graft rejection. In fact, the outcome of organ transplantation can be impacted by several genetic causes including polymorphisms in genes encoding cytokines and costimulatory molecules in the donor or recipient. Thus, it can be helpful to contemplate the SNPs relating to these immunological determinants in order to achieve an improved transplantation therapy.
    Expert Review of Clinical Immunology 11/2013; 9(11):1099-112. · 2.89 Impact Factor