Article

Highly parallel identification of essential genes in cancer cells

Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, 7 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Impact Factor: 9.81). 01/2009; 105(51):20380-5. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0810485105
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT More complete knowledge of the molecular mechanisms underlying cancer will improve prevention, diagnosis and treatment. Efforts such as The Cancer Genome Atlas are systematically characterizing the structural basis of cancer, by identifying the genomic mutations associated with each cancer type. A powerful complementary approach is to systematically characterize the functional basis of cancer, by identifying the genes essential for growth and related phenotypes in different cancer cells. Such information would be particularly valuable for identifying potential drug targets. Here, we report the development of an efficient, robust approach to perform genome-scale pooled shRNA screens for both positive and negative selection and its application to systematically identify cell essential genes in 12 cancer cell lines. By integrating these functional data with comprehensive genetic analyses of primary human tumors, we identified known and putative oncogenes such as EGFR, KRAS, MYC, BCR-ABL, MYB, CRKL, and CDK4 that are essential for cancer cell proliferation and also altered in human cancers. We further used this approach to identify genes involved in the response of cancer cells to tumoricidal agents and found 4 genes required for the response of CML cells to imatinib treatment: PTPN1, NF1, SMARCB1, and SMARCE1, and 5 regulators of the response to FAS activation, FAS, FADD, CASP8, ARID1A and CBX1. Broad application of this highly parallel genetic screening strategy will not only facilitate the rapid identification of genes that drive the malignant state and its response to therapeutics but will also enable the discovery of genes that participate in any biological process.

0 Followers
 · 
228 Views
  • Source
    • "Enrichment of pY-modified peptides was performed by using PhosphoScan reagents (CST) essentially following the manufacturer's recommendations [44]. Inline reversed-phase chromatography was performed using an integrated nano- LC system (Easy-nLC, Proxeon Biosystems A/S, Odense, Denmark). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aberrant expression and activation of FGFR3 is associated with disease states including bone dysplasia and malignancies of bladder, cervix, and bone marrow. MS analysis of protein-phosphotyrosine in multiple myeloma cells revealed a prevalent phosphorylated motif, D/EYYR/K, derived from the kinase domain activation loops of tyrosine kinases including FGFR3 corresponding to a recognition sequence of phosphotyrosine phosphatases PTPN1. Knockdown of PTPN1 or the related enzyme PTPN2 by RNAi resulted in ligand-independent activation of FGFR3. Modulation of FGFR3 activation loop phosphorylation by both PTPN1 and PTPN2 was a function of receptor trafficking and PTP compartmentalization. The FGFR3 activation loop motif DYYKK650 is altered to DYYKE650 in the oncogenic variant FGFR3K650E, and consequently it is constitutively fully activated and unaffected by activation loop phosphorylation. FGFR3K650E was nevertheless remarkably sensitive to negative regulation by PTPN1 and PTPN2. This suggests that in addition to modulating FGFR3 phosphorylation, PTPN1 and PTPN2 constrain the kinase domain by fostering an inactive-state. Loss of this constraint in response to ligand or impaired PTPN1/N2 may initiate FGFR3 activation. These results suggest a model wherein PTP expression levels may define conditions that select for ectopic FGFR3 expression and activation during tumorigenesis.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
    Proteomics 01/2015; 15(2-3). DOI:10.1002/pmic.201400259 · 3.97 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "To mitigate these effects, analytical approaches have been developed that look for phenotypic consistency across multiple hairpins targeting a gene (Luo et al, 2008; Cheung et al, 2011; Marcotte et al, 2012) and among the same hairpins in different screens (Shao et al, 2013). Not surprisingly, different approaches can yield different results, and the degree to which false positives contaminate results is largely unknown (Kaelin, 2012). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Technological advancement has opened the door to systematic genetics in mammalian cells. Genome-scale loss-of-function screens can assay fitness defects induced by partial gene knockdown, using RNA interference, or complete gene knockout, using new CRISPR techniques. These screens can reveal the basic blueprint required for cellular proliferation. Moreover, comparing healthy to cancerous tissue can uncover genes that are essential only in the tumor; these genes are targets for the development of specific anticancer therapies. Unfortunately, progress in this field has been hampered by off-target effects of perturbation reagents and poorly quantified error rates in large-scale screens. To improve the quality of information derived from these screens, and to provide a framework for understanding the capabilities and limitations of CRISPR technology, we derive gold-standard reference sets of essential and nonessential genes, and provide a Bayesian classifier of gene essentiality that outperforms current methods on both RNAi and CRISPR screens. Our results indicate that CRISPR technology is more sensitive than RNAi and that both techniques have nontrivial false discovery rates that can be mitigated by rigorous analytical methods.
    Molecular Systems Biology 07/2014; 10(7). DOI:10.15252/msb.20145216 · 14.10 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The " second best " method assigns scores to genes based on each gene's second most differentially scoring reagent between classes (Cheung et al. 2011), requiring – similar to the " frequency approach " – that favorable genes have at least two high-scoring reagents. Alternatively, RNAi Gene Enrichment Ranking (RIGER) ranks all the reagents by their differential effects and generates a gene-level score for each gene based on the rank distribution of its reagents (Luo et al. 2008; Barbie et al. 2009), analogous to RSA. However, the requirement of two pre-defined classes can limit full interrogation of the data. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Genome-scale RNAi libraries enable the systematic interrogation of gene function. However, the interpretation of RNAi screens is complicated by the observation that RNAi reagents designed to suppress the mRNA transcripts of the same gene often produce a spectrum of phenotypic outcomes due to differential on-target gene suppression or perturbation of off-target transcripts. Here we present a computational method, Analytic Technique for Assessment of RNAi by Similarity (ATARiS), that takes advantage of patterns in RNAi data across multiple samples in order to enrich for RNAi reagents whose phenotypic effects relate to suppression of their intended targets. By summarizing only such reagent effects for each gene, ATARiS produces quantitative, gene-level phenotype values, which provide an intuitive measure of the effect of gene suppression in each sample. This method is robust for datasets that contain as few as ten samples and can be used to analyze screens of any number of targeted genes. We used this analytic approach to interrogate RNAi data derived from screening more than 100 human cancer cell lines and identified HNF1B as a transforming oncogene required for the survival of cancer cells that harbor HNF1B amplifications.
    Genome Research 12/2012; 23(4). DOI:10.1101/gr.143586.112 · 13.85 Impact Factor
Show more