"What is found there": qualitative analysis of physician-nurse collaboration stories.

Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
Journal of General Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.42). 01/2009; 24(2):198-204. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-008-0869-5
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Effective physician-nurse collaboration is an important, but incompletely understood determinant of patient and nurse satisfaction, and patient safety. Its impact on physicians has not been described. This study was undertaken to develop a fuller understanding of the collaboration experience and its outcomes.
Twenty-five medical residents, 32 staff nurses, 5 physician and 5 nurse faculty wrote narratives about successful collaboration; the narratives were then qualitatively analyzed. Narrative analysis was the initial qualitative method iteratively employed to identify themes. A phenomenological approach was subsequently used to develop a framework for collaborative competence.
Collaboration triggers, facilitative behaviors, outcomes and collaborative competence were the themes identified. Affect was identified in the triggers leading to collaboration and in its outcomes. Practioners typically entered a care episode feeling worried, uncertain or inadequate and finished the interaction feeling satisfied, understood and grateful to their colleagues. The frequency of affective experience was not altered by gender, profession, or ethnicity. These experiences were particularly powerful for novice practioners of both disciplines and appear to have both formative and transformative potential. Collaborative competence was characterized by a series of graduated skills in clinical and relational domains. Many stories took place in the ICU and afterhours settings.
Despite the prevailing wisdom that nursing and medicine are qualitatively different, the stories from this study illuminate surprising commonalities in the collaboration experience, regardless of gender, age, experience, or profession. Collaborative competence can be defined and its component skills identified. Contexts of care can be identified that offer particularly rich opportunities to foster interprofessional collaboration.

1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: Effective collaboration has been identified as essential to quality patient care processes and outcomes. Yet, the conceptual and theoretical basis for understanding and practicing collaboration remains underdeveloped and imprecise. These factors may hamper the study of collaboration and therefore the optimization of care processes and outcomes. The purpose of this study was to understand the social processes associated with collaboration between nurses and physicians, with the intention of theory development. Background: Collaboration, or a lack thereof, has been shown to impact both provider and patient satisfaction and outcomes. JCAHO now requires proof of collaboration for accreditation. Many organizations state that their providers collaborate for the betterment of patient care. However, a thorough literature search determined that a theory of nurse-physician collaboration based in healthcare has yet to be published. Without theoretical support it is difficult to devise precise measurement instruments to truly understand the current level of collaboration and develop strategies for improvement. Method: A grounded theory study was conducted with the intent of developing a theory to support nurse-physician collaboration. Sample: Data were collected from 15 nurses and 7 physicians with a wide range of experience and training from a variety of units thus allowing the theory to be applicable to a range of professionals. Research Question: The purpose, or main concern, of this study was to conceptually understand if and how nurse-physician collaboration takes place with the intention of theory development. Results: Results indicated that the process of nurse physician collaboration involves 9 stages: something needs our attention; knowing who to talk to; finding the right perso; coming together; exchanging ideas and information; developing the plan; getting everybody on the right page; making it happen; and monitoring progress. The core category of working together toward a common goal describes how nurses and physicians collaborate for patient care. It is anticipated that this theory will add to the body of knowledge and contribute to the understanding of collaboration between these two disciplines.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A good collaboration between health professionals is considered to have benefits for patients, healthcare staff, and organizations. Nevertheless, effective interprofessional collaboration is difficult to achieve. This is particularly true for collaboration between Medical Residents (MRs) and the immediate colleagues they interact with, as Senior Doctors (SDs) and Head Nurses (HNs). Role understanding is one of the factors that may explain difficulties in interprofessional collaboration. Based on this hypothesis, this paper focuses on MRs' role, devoting particular attention to differences in role perception between MRs, SDs, and HNs, and to their consequences for interprofessional collaboration. An exploratory qualitative study inspired by Grounded Theory was conducted in April 2009 in a small peripheral and non-university hospital in Switzerland. Data came from two focus groups with MRs (13), one with SDs (8), and one with HNs (7), and were analyzed using the constant comparative method. Findings show that the expected and the enacted role of MR are perceived differently by SDs, HNs and MRs themselves. To face the inconsistencies within MR's role, the three professional groups develop some adjustments that eventually prove to be paradoxical: on one side, they make collaboration possible and preserve the functioning of the ward, while on the other side they lead to mutual misunderstanding and discontent. These findings suggest that there is an urgent need of defining the role of MRs, of delimiting its boundaries and thereby distinguishing it from other health workers, and eventually of promoting a shared representation of it.
    Advances in Health Sciences Education 10/2013; 19(3). DOI:10.1007/s10459-013-9471-7 · 2.71 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: In the Need-Adapted approach decisions are made in therapy meetings with all relevant parties; this poses a professional challenge to psychiatrists.Aims: To describe psychiatrists’ inner dialogues concerning their workmates in treatment meetings.Methods: Using videos of co-research interviews, stimulated-recall interviews with eight psychiatrists were conducted and transcribed verbatim. The material was analyzed using an adapted form of dialogical analysis, focusing on voices and positioning.Results: The psychiatrists took actions in the treatment situation not only as professionals, but also as individuals who had their own characteristics, and individual relationships with their co-workers.Conclusions: Professionals as individuals, and the quality of clinician-clinician relationships, have an impact on treatment. These aspects should be taken into account in practice, in education, and in future research.
    (Psychosis) Psychological, Social and Integrative Approaches 01/2012; 5(1):1-11. DOI:10.1080/17522439.2012.664775 · 1.00 Impact Factor


1 Download
Available from