Patient perspectives of their leg ulcer journey

Journal of Wound Care (Impact Factor: 1.07). 02/2013; 22(2):58-66. DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2013.22.2.58
Source: PubMed


Objective: To understand the personal impact of venous leg ulceration from the patients' perspective. Method: Face-to-face, unstructured interviews were conducted with nine patient participants with venous leg ulcers. The interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and, using thematic analysis, the themes and subthemes which impacted on quality of life were identified. Results: Four core themes were identified: the ulcer, symptoms, wound management and effects on daily life, with 16 subthemes that negatively impacted on quality of life (QoL) also identified. Conclusion: This qualitative study offers a valuable insight into the complex issues that impact on daily living for this patient group. The implications of the findings are far reaching and suggest that proactive symptom management and the fostering of a patient focus to consultations may improve QoL and encourage the patient to engage as an active partner in his/her management plan; both of which are explored in the subsequent phases of the larger study. Declaration of interest: This study was funded by West Midlands Strategic Health Authority. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Download full-text


Available from: Julie Green, Oct 02, 2015
335 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: To quantify the extent to which patients disclose their concerns to community nurses during wound care consultations. Method: Using an 'observation checklist' based on themes and subthemes that were identified in a previous study of the same patients, 20 wound care consultations were observed. The non-participant observer completed the checklist and made field notes regarding the context and nature of interactions. Results: Patient participants had 160 opportunities to raise concerns regarding previously-identified pain, exudate and odour, yet they did not do so on 64 (40%) occasions. They had 28, 32 and 84 opportunities to raise emotional, wound care and daily living issues, respectively, and they did not on 16 (56%), 3 (9%) and 32 (38%) occasions. Overall, patients did not raise 38% of their concerns. Of the concerns that were raised, 8% were either not acknowledged or were disregarded by their community nurse. Conclusion: If these data are representative, this has profound implications for person-centred care and shared decision-making models of care, which are predicated on patients articulating their needs. They also have implications for the development of practitioners' communication and consulting skills.
    Journal of Wound Care 10/2013; 22(10):534-9. DOI:10.12968/jowc.2013.22.10.534 · 1.07 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The academic literature reveals a dearth of evidence regarding the wound prevalence across a community setting, despite the need for both clinicians and commissioners to understand local need. To support the commissioning process, a wound prevalence audit was undertaken across all community services in an inner London borough in 2012 as part of a local needs analysis and to identify where resources were required. Within a population of 254,000, 272 residents had a total of 325 wounds, giving a mean of 1.19 wounds and a community wound prevalence of 1.07 per 1000 residents. The majority were male (51%) and the age range was 9–96 years. Acute and traumatic wounds accounted for 44% followed by foot and leg ulcers at 41%, pressure ulcers at 13% and other wound types at 2.6%. Of the lower leg ulceration group, 34 patients had venous ulceration, giving a prevalence of 0.13 per 1000. The difficulties in establishing a comprehensive wound prevalence that includes acute services are discussed in addition to the significance of the findings in the context of a deprived ethnically diverse borough with a younger population. The number of residents with any wound type was lower than other reported studies with similar methodologies. This paper presents the view that, despite the deprivation of the borough, the combined factors of age, ethnicity and early access to specialist expertise appear to deliver a lower community wound prevalence.
    Journal of tissue viability 11/2014; 16(4). DOI:10.1016/j.jtv.2014.10.002 · 1.13 Impact Factor