Best interests, patient participation and the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

Law Faculty, University College Cork.
Medical Law Review (Impact Factor: 0.65). 01/2009; 17(1):1-29. DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwn021
Source: PubMed


This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Medical Law Review following peer review. This article analyses the best interests standard as applied in the context of healthcare decisions in light of the participative elements introduced by the Mental Capacity Act (EW). It begins with a brief consideration of the best interests standard as it developed at common law. The article shows that, while the courts gradually developed a more systematic approach to best interests, judges remained largely resistant to facilitating participation by patients lacking capacity. The article examines the changes brought about by the MCA in this regard. It explores the policy basis for this aspect of the MCA and shows why the participative model represents the most appropriate response to decision-making for people lacking mental capacity. The article argues that notwithstanding the attractions of the MCA’s participative framework from a policy perspective, this approach to best interests gives rise to important practical and conceptual questions, which the article then explores. The article examines the difficulties in delivering genuine participation at a practical level and identifies the risk that patient participation will become a tokenistic endeavour.

19 Reads
  • Source

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article examines whether the Mental Capacity Act 2005 has or should change the approach of the courts in assessing damages for protected parties in clinical negligence/catastrophic personal injury claims.
    Clinical Risk 01/2011; 17(1):21-25. DOI:10.1258/cr.2010.010071
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), children capable of forming views have the right to express those views and have them taken into account in all decisions that affect them. Attention has only focused recently on the child’s right to be heard in the context of healthcare decision-making. This article addresses this issue from both a legal and a medical perspective. It begins by considering what participation means and by differentiating between autonomous decision-making by children and children’s participation in decision-making. It then evaluates the current state of participation in practice, drawing especially on a study conducted by the authors into the realities of children’s participation in healthcare decision-making in Ireland. This study helps identify a number of barriers to the delivery of participative practices. In particular, it identifies the potentially inhibiting role of parents, a finding which is replicated by studies in other jurisdictions. The article then investigates the legal status of parental objections to children’s participation and argues that both the CRC and the European Convention on Human Rights provide legal support for a requirement that the child’s right to participate in healthcare decision-making must be protected, even in the face of parental objections. The article also argues that focused legislation and codes of practice have a valuable contribution to make to the delivery of children’s participation rights in practice and that the introduction of such measures should be a priority.
    Medical Law Review 12/2011; 19(1):27-54. DOI:10.1093/medlaw/fwq034 · 0.65 Impact Factor
Show more


19 Reads
Available from