Rifaximin versus Nonabsorbable Disaccharides for the Treatment of Hepatic Encephalopathy: A Meta-Analysis.

Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200072, China.
Gastroenterology Research and Practice (Impact Factor: 1.5). 01/2013; 2013:236963. DOI: 10.1155/2013/236963
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Background. Many studies have found that the antibiotic rifaximin is effective for the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy. However, there is no uniform view on the efficacy and safety of rifaximin. Methods. We performed a meta-analysis through electronic searches to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rifaximin in comparison with nonabsorbable disaccharides. Results. A total of 8 randomized controlled trials including 407 patients were included. The efficacy of rifaximin was equivalent to nonabsorbable disaccharides according to the statistical data (risk ratio (RR): 1.06, 95% CI: 0.94-1.19; P = 0.34). Analysis showed that patients treated with rifaximin had better results in serum ammonia levels (weighted mean difference (WMD): -10.63, 95% CI: -30.63-9.38; P = 0.30), mental status (WMD: -0.32, 95% CI: -0.67-0.03; P = 0.07), asterixis (WMD: -0.12, 95% CI: -0.31-0.08; P = 0.23), electroencephalogram response (WMD: -0.21, 95% CI: -0.34--0.09; P = 0.0007), and grades of portosystemic encephalopathy (WMD: -2.30, 95% CI: -2.78--1.82; P < 0.00001), but only the last ones had statistical significance. The safety of rifaximin was better than nonabsorbable disaccharides (RR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.10-0.34; P < 0.00001). Conclusion. Rifaximin is at least as effective as nonabsorbable disaccharides, maybe better for the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy. And the safety of rifaximin is better.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the role of probiotics in the standard triple Helicobacter pylori therapy. In this meta-analysis, we investigated the efficacy of probiotics in a standard triple H. pylori therapy in adults. Searches were mainly conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Fourteen studies met our criteria, and the quality of these studies was assessed using the Jadad scale. We used STATA version 12.0 to extract data and to calculate the odds ratios (ORs), which are presented with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The data are presented as forest plots. The pooled ORs for the eradication rates calculated by intention-to-treat analysis and per-protocol analysis in the probiotic group vs the control group were 1.67 (95%CI: 1.38-2.02) and 1.68 (95%CI: 1.35-2.08), respectively, using the fixed-effects model. The sensitivity of the Asian studies was greater than that of the Caucasian studies (Asian: OR = 1.78, 95%CI: 1.40-2.26; Caucasian: OR = 1.48, 95%CI: 1.06-2.05). The pooled OR for the incidence of total adverse effects was significantly lower in the probiotic group (OR = 0.49, 95%CI: 0.26-0.94), using the random effects model, with significant heterogeneity (I (2) = 85.7%). The incidence of diarrhea was significantly reduced in the probiotic group (OR = 0.21, 95%CI: 0.06-0.74), whereas the incidence of taste disorders, metallic taste, vomiting, nausea, and epigastric pain did not differ significantly between the probiotic group and the control group. Supplementary probiotic preparations during standard triple H. pylori therapy may improve the eradication rate, particularly in Asian patients, and the incidence of total adverse effects.
    World journal of gastroenterology : WJG. 12/2014; 20(47):18013-21.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background. There have been many reports on des-γ-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) as a promising serum marker in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, the results are inconsistent and even conflicting. Methods. This meta-analysis was performed to investigate the performance of DCP in the diagnosis of HCC. Following a systematic review of relevant studies, Meta-DiSc 1.4 software was used to extract data and to calculate the overall sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). Data are presented as forest plots and summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) analysis was used to summarize the overall test performance. Results. Twelve studies were included in our meta-analysis. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PLR, and NLR of DCP for the detection of HCC in the studies included were 71% (95%CI: 68%-73%), 84% (95%CI: 83%-86%), 6.48 (95%CI: 4.22-9.93), and 0.33 (95%CI: 0.25-0.43), respectively. The area under the SROC curve was 0.8930 and the Q index was 0.8238. Significant heterogeneity was found. Conclusion. This meta-analysis indicated that DCP had moderate diagnostic accuracy in HCC. Further studies with rigorous design, large sample size, and mmultiregional cooperation are needed in the future.
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice 01/2014; 2014:529314. · 1.50 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a serious neuropsychiatric complication that is seen in patients with liver failure. The pathogenesis of HE is not entirely understood, but several hypotheses have emerged and persisted during the years. Despite the many prevalent hypotheses, most of the existing evidence point to ammonia as the main culprit behind primary and secondary symptoms making it the center of potential therapeutic options for the treatment of HE. Most treatments of hyperammonemia target the organs and metabolic processes involved in ammonia detoxification. Areas covered: This article provides a review of the current targets of therapy as well as the drugs used for hyperammonemia treatment. Expert opinion: Lactulose and rifaximin have a proven role as measures to use for secondary prophylaxis and are the mainstay of current therapy. The use of molecular adsorbent recirculating system in patients with severe HE has been proven to be efficacious, but through mechanisms that appear to be independent of ammonia. The main challenge that faces the further development of treatments for HE is finding appropriate end points, and the next step would be to provide evidence of the effectiveness of established treatments and define the role of emerging new treatments.
    Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy 08/2014; 15(12):1685-1695. · 2.86 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 20, 2014