Rifaximin versus Nonabsorbable Disaccharides for the Treatment of Hepatic Encephalopathy: A Meta-Analysis

Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200072, China.
Gastroenterology Research and Practice (Impact Factor: 1.75). 04/2013; 2013:236963. DOI: 10.1155/2013/236963
Source: PubMed


Background. Many studies have found that the antibiotic rifaximin is effective for the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy. However, there is no uniform view on the efficacy and safety of rifaximin. Methods. We performed a meta-analysis through electronic searches to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rifaximin in comparison with nonabsorbable disaccharides. Results. A total of 8 randomized controlled trials including 407 patients were included. The efficacy of rifaximin was equivalent to nonabsorbable disaccharides according to the statistical data (risk ratio (RR): 1.06, 95% CI: 0.94-1.19; P = 0.34). Analysis showed that patients treated with rifaximin had better results in serum ammonia levels (weighted mean difference (WMD): -10.63, 95% CI: -30.63-9.38; P = 0.30), mental status (WMD: -0.32, 95% CI: -0.67-0.03; P = 0.07), asterixis (WMD: -0.12, 95% CI: -0.31-0.08; P = 0.23), electroencephalogram response (WMD: -0.21, 95% CI: -0.34--0.09; P = 0.0007), and grades of portosystemic encephalopathy (WMD: -2.30, 95% CI: -2.78--1.82; P < 0.00001), but only the last ones had statistical significance. The safety of rifaximin was better than nonabsorbable disaccharides (RR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.10-0.34; P < 0.00001). Conclusion. Rifaximin is at least as effective as nonabsorbable disaccharides, maybe better for the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy. And the safety of rifaximin is better.

Download full-text


Available from: Chuan-Yong Guo, Oct 04, 2015
103 Reads
  • Source
    • "Rong Zhu and Jing Yang). Studies were mainly searched in MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, Science Citation Index (ISI Web of Science), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) [19] [20] "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background. There have been many reports on des-γ-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) as a promising serum marker in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, the results are inconsistent and even conflicting. Methods. This meta-analysis was performed to investigate the performance of DCP in the diagnosis of HCC. Following a systematic review of relevant studies, Meta-DiSc 1.4 software was used to extract data and to calculate the overall sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). Data are presented as forest plots and summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) analysis was used to summarize the overall test performance. Results. Twelve studies were included in our meta-analysis. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PLR, and NLR of DCP for the detection of HCC in the studies included were 71% (95%CI: 68%-73%), 84% (95%CI: 83%-86%), 6.48 (95%CI: 4.22-9.93), and 0.33 (95%CI: 0.25-0.43), respectively. The area under the SROC curve was 0.8930 and the Q index was 0.8238. Significant heterogeneity was found. Conclusion. This meta-analysis indicated that DCP had moderate diagnostic accuracy in HCC. Further studies with rigorous design, large sample size, and mmultiregional cooperation are needed in the future.
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice 08/2014; 2014:529314. DOI:10.1155/2014/529314 · 1.75 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The relevant studies were identified and selected by searching the databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Science Citation Index (updated to June 2013) [13] with the search terms " ursodeoxycholic acid " , " corticosteroids " , " combination therapy " , " PBC- AIH " , and " randomized controlled trial. " We also carried out "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A meta-analysis was performed of RCTs comparing therapies that combine UDCA and corticosteroids with UDCA monotherapy. In this paper, we found that the combination therapy of UDCA and corticosteroids was more effective for PBC-AIH.
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice 12/2013; 2013(2):490731. DOI:10.1155/2013/490731 · 1.75 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study is to provide an overview of bacterial biliary tract infections in liver transplant recipients with a focus on pathogenesis and conservative treatment strategies. The development of interventional endoscopic and radiologic interventions has improved the outcome of conservative treatments for bile tract strictures and bilomas. However, recent data show an important rise of infections with multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens in liver transplant recipients. Both recurrent cholangitis and infected bilomas are bacterial biliary tract infections in liver transplant recipients responsible for significant morbidity and graft loss, which require a multidisciplinary approach. Risk factors for biliary tract strictures and bilomas formation have recently been identified. With the improved outcome of a conservative management including prolonged and/or recurrent antibiotic treatments, the risk of selecting resistant pathogens is increased. There is an urgent need to develop new strategies to reduce the risk of secondary infections by MDR isolates in liver transplant recipients.
    Current opinion in organ transplantation 04/2014; 19(3). DOI:10.1097/MOT.0000000000000083 · 2.88 Impact Factor
Show more