Article

Rectangular mucosal flap with artificial dermis grafting for vermilion deformity in cleft lips.

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Asahi 1-4-3, Abeno, Osaka 545-8585, Japan.
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery (Impact Factor: 1.47). 01/2009; 63(1):22-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2008.08.027
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The treatment of whistling deformity in patients with cleft lip remains controversial. Previous reconstruction methods of whistling deformity have been limited in volume due to the necessity for primary closure of the donor site. This article presents a new method for secondary reconstruction of the vermilion deformity in patients with cleft lip. Our method is very simple and advantageous, in that primary closure after correction is not required. A rectangular mucosal flap is designed at the wet mucosal aspect of the upper lip. Inferiorly, this flap is based at the junction of the vermilion and mucosa, while the upper incision line should be at the buccal sulcus. This rectangular flap is advanced sagittally, and a labial thickness is reconstructed. Artificial dermis is grafted to the mucosal defect after flap advancement and mucosa regenerates secondarily. We applied this technique to secondary reconstruction in 32 patients with cleft lip between January 2001 and January 2005. Major complications (necrosis of mucosal flap and recurrence of whistling deformity) did not occur in any of the patients. Four patients required minor operations to reduce the volume. CONCLUSIONS: This rectangular mucosal flap with artificial dermis offers many advantages, including easy technique and minimal sacrifices. The combination of mucosal flap and artificial dermis prevents postoperative scar contracture and reduces the limitations of using the available volume of flap. We believe that this procedure is versatile and reliable not only for whistling deformity in cleft lip patients, but also for tissue defects of the lip resulting from other causes.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
78 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The whistle deformity is one of the common sequelae of secondary cleft lip deformities. Santos reported using a crossed-denuded flap for primary cleft lip repair to prevent a vermilion notching. The authors modified this technique to correct the whistle deformity, calling their version the cross-muscle flap. From May 2005 to January 2011, 14 secondary unilateral cleft lip patients were treated. All suffered from a whistle deformity, which is characterized by the deficiency of the central tubercle, notching in the upper lip, and bulging on the lateral segment. The mean age of the patients was 13.8 years and the mean follow-up period was 21.8 weeks. After elevation from the lateral vermilion and medial tubercle, two muscle flaps were crossed and turned over. The authors measured the three vertical heights and compared the two height ratios before and after surgery for evaluation of the postoperative results. None of the patients had any notable complications and the whistle deformity was corrected in all cases. The vertical height ratios at the midline on the upper lip and the affected Cupid's bow point were increased (P<0.05). The motion of the upper lip was acceptable. A cross muscle flap is simple and it leaves a minimal scar on the lip. We were able to reconstruct the whistle deformity in secondary unilateral cleft lip patients with a single state procedure using a cross-muscle flap.
    Archives of plastic surgery. 09/2012; 39(5):470-6.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives: The present prospective study aimed at objectively evaluating the relevance of a single horizontal Y-V vermilion plasty including orbicularis oris muscle repair for secondary correction of whistling deformities in unilateral as well as bilateral cleft lip cases. Study Design: Ten patients were included in the study (mean age 20.2±6.2 years). The size of the whistling defects was determined on photographs before and 12 months after surgery. Additional surgical procedures like columella lengthening and rhinoplasty were documented. Results: Seven minor and 3 moderate whistling defects were corrected. In 7 patients additional procedures were carried out. The data of the 12 months follow-up showed that the whistling defect was significantly reduced in size (p<0005). In 7 out of 10 patients the result of surgery was rated "good" and in 3 patients "moderate". Conclusions: The present prospective study is the first one to show on an objective basis that the presented technique allows reducing whistling deformities significantly with good overall results in the majority of the cases. Moreover, the technique can be combined with other corrective procedures like columella lengthening without problems. As a consequence, it is a relevant and universal surgical technique for the correction of whistling defects.
    Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal 12/2012; · 1.10 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Various techniques have been described for the correction of whistle deformity, but no single technique can be used for all types of whistle deformities because the cause of deformity and tissues available for its correction may be different. METHOD: Forty-seven cases of whistle deformity were divided in to 5 groups depending on its cause (deficient tissue) and the tissues available for its correction. Various techniques available for the correction of whistle deformity were analyzed. Techniques available for that particular group were short listed, and the appropriate technique was selected for correction of whistle deformity of the patient belonging to that particular group. RESULT: Of the 47 patients, 3 required reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed classification of whistle deformity and, accordingly, an algorithm for its management helps the operating surgeon to select the appropriate technique from a wide list of options available for correcting whistle deformity.
    Annals of plastic surgery 01/2013; · 1.29 Impact Factor