The clinical content of preconception care: care of psychosocial stressors

Institute for Child, Youth, and Family Policy, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA.
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology (Impact Factor: 4.7). 01/2009; 199(6 Suppl 2):S362-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.08.042
Source: PubMed


In the period before conceiving, many women are under considerable psychosocial stress, which may affect their ability to conceive and to carry a pregnancy successfully to term. Thus, health care providers who interact with women in the preconception and interconception period should ask their patients about possible psychosocial risks. It is no longer sufficient to wait until the woman mentions a problem or seeks advice; the provider must be proactive, because many women do not realize the potential impact of stressors on their pregnancy outcomes nor are they always aware that their provider is interested in their psychosocial as well as their physical health. An income that puts women below or near the federal poverty level is one such stress. If a woman's economic situation can be improved before the pregnancy, she is more likely to be healthy after conception, because increased income can reduce financial stress, improve food security, and improve well-being in other ways. Therefore, all women should be asked about their economic status and those who appear to be struggling financially should be referred to an agency that can check their eligibility for various types of financial assistance. Many women of childbearing age have difficulty accessing the primary care services needed for preconception care. Usually this is due to lack of insurance, but it may also be caused by living in an area with an insufficient number of providers. Certainly all women who are uninsured, and possible many who are on Medicaid and have difficulty finding providers who will accept Medicaid, have access problems. All women should be asked about their health insurance coverage and their usual source of care. If they do not have health insurance, they should be referred to an agency that can determine their eligibility. If they do not have a usual source of care, one should be established that will accept their insurance coverage or provide care free of charge or on a sliding fee basis. Intimate partner violence, sexual violence outside of an intimate relationship (usually rape), and maltreatment (abuse or neglect) as a child or adolescent place a woman at elevated risk during a pregnancy, as well as having possible adverse impacts on the fetus, the infant, and the child. Studies show that women believe it is appropriate for health care providers to ask about interpersonal violence, but that they will not report it spontaneously. Therefore, screening for ongoing and historical interpersonal violence, sexual violence, and child maltreatment should be incorporated into routine care by all health care providers.

Download full-text


Available from: Brian W Jack,
19 Reads
  • Source
    • "Thus, nurses should ask every patient about possible psychosocial stressors and suggest strategies for stress reduction. Nurses at all practice levels should be proactive, as many women do not realize the potential negative impact of stressors on pregnancy and birth outcomes (Klerman et al., 2008). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this article is to discuss the importance of implementing a life course perspective model that includes a reproductive life plan to improve health outcomes, especially in populations at risk for adverse outcomes. A reproductive life plan is a comprehensive strategy that can be incorporated into nursing practice at all levels to improve birth outcomes. Health care providers, especially nurses, should incorporate reproductive life planning into their daily encounters with patients. © 2010 AWHONN, the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses.
    Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing 01/2011; 40(1):109-19; quiz 120-1. DOI:10.1111/j.1552-6909.2010.01203.x · 1.02 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite the substantial global burden of preterm and stillbirth, little attention has been given to the ethical considerations related to research and interventions in the global context. Ethical dilemmas surrounding reproductive decisions and the care of preterm newborns impact the delivery of interventions, and are not well understood in low-resource settings. Issues such as how to address the moral and cultural attitudes surrounding stillbirths, have cross-cutting implications for global visibility of the disease burden. This analysis identifies ethical issues impacting definitions, discovery, development, and delivery of effective interventions to decrease the global burden of preterm birth and stillbirth. This review is based on a comprehensive literature review; an ethical analysis of other articles within this global report; and discussions with GAPPS's Scientific Advisory Council, team of international investigators, and a community of international experts on maternal, newborn, and child health and bioethics from the 2009 International Conference on Prematurity and Stillbirth. The literature review includes articles in PubMed, Academic Search Complete (EBSCO), and Philosopher's Index with a range of 1995-2008. Advancements in discovery science relating to preterm birth and stillbirth require careful consideration in the design and use of repositories containing maternal specimens and data. Equally important is the need to improve clinical translation from basic science research to delivery of interventions, and to ensure global needs inform discovery science agenda-setting. Ethical issues in the development of interventions include a need to balance immediate versus long-term impacts--such as caring for preterm newborns rather than preventing preterm births. The delivery of interventions must address: women's health disparities as determinants of preterm birth and stillbirth; improving measurements of impact on equity in coverage; balancing maternal and newborn outcomes in choosing interventions; and understanding the personal and cross-cultural experiences of preterm birth and stillbirth among women, families and communities. Efforts to improve visibility, funding, research and the successful delivery of interventions for preterm birth and stillbirth face a number of ethical concerns. Thoughtful input from those in health policy, bioethics and international research ethics helped shape an interdisciplinary global action agenda to prevent preterm birth and stillbirth.
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 02/2010; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S6. DOI:10.1186/1471-2393-10-S1-S6 · 2.19 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Quality care for infant mortality disparity elimination requires services that improve health status at both the individual and the population level. We examine disparity reduction due to effective care and ask the following question: Has clinical care ameliorated factors that make some populations more likely to have higher rates of infant mortality compared with other populations? Disparities in postneonatal mortality due to birth defects have emerged for non-Hispanic black and Hispanic infants. Surfactant and antenatal steroid therapy have been accompanied by growing disparities in respiratory distress syndrome mortality for black infants. Progesterone therapy has not reduced early preterm birth, the major contributor to mortality disparities among non-Hispanic black and Puerto Rican infants. The Back to Sleep campaign has minimally reduced SIDS disparities among American Indian/Alaska Native infants, but it has not reduced disparities among non-Hispanic black infants. In general, clinical care is not equitable and contributes to increasing disparities.
    Annual Review of Public Health 04/2011; 33:75-87. DOI:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031811-124542 · 6.47 Impact Factor
Show more